Automation Integration · head to head
Celigo vs Tines

Celigo
Automation Integration
The iPaaS platform for mid-market and enterprise
- From
- $400/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tines has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Celigo prices are not published on any of the three editions; Tines no-code, UI-driven approach is restrictive for complex logic and version control integration with SDLC
- They diverge on capability: Celigo covers App integration, Tines covers Story builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Celigo and Tines actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Celigo
- App integration
- Process automation
- Master data management
- API management
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Analytics
- 800+ apps
Only in Tines
- Story builder
- Drag-and-drop workflows
- Event triggers
- Incident response automation
- Threat intelligence
- Case management
- Alert triage
- Slack
Both cover
- SOC2
- GDPR
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Celigo
- Integrating NetSuite with ecommerce and CRM systemsnot Tines
- Prebuilt integration templates between common business applicationsnot Tines
- Building custom flows between internal systemsnot Tines
- Governance and auditability over integrations on the higher editionsnot Tines
Tines
- Workflow Automationnot Celigo
- Data Integrationnot Celigo
- Process Automationnot Celigo
- App Integrationnot Celigo
- API Connectivitynot Celigo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Celigo
- Prices are not published on any of the three editions
- Billed on endpoints and flows, so the cost is driven by how many systems you connect rather than by volume through them
- API Builder, lookup caching and a sandbox all require the Professional edition
- Single sign-on is optional on Standard and included from Professional up
- Unlimited endpoints and the full governance features are Enterprise only
Tines
- No-code, UI-driven approach is restrictive for complex logic and version control integration with SDLC
- No native log intelligence layer to validate data completeness
- Limited scope to security workloads, cannot handle general business automation
- Governance features lag behind EU AI Act compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Celigo
$400/month- Growth$400/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Scale$1200/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$3000/month
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
Tines
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tines review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Celigo if
- You need app integration.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want process automation.
Choose Tines if
- You need story builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want drag-and-drop workflows.
Questions people ask
- Is Celigo or Tines better?
- Neither clearly leads. Celigo starts at $400/month and Tines at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Celigo or Tines?
- Tines has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $400/month for Celigo and Free for Tines.
- Does Celigo or Tines run on more platforms?
- Celigo runs on Web, Mobile. Tines runs on Web.
- Can I use Tines for free?
- Yes. Tines has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Celigo starts at $400/month.
- What is Celigo best used for?
- Celigo is most often used for integrating netsuite with ecommerce and crm systems, prebuilt integration templates between common business applications, building custom flows between internal systems, governance and auditability over integrations on the higher editions. Of those, integrating netsuite with ecommerce and crm systems and prebuilt integration templates between common business applications are not what Tines is typically brought in for.
- What can Celigo do that Tines cannot?
- Celigo covers App integration, Process automation, Master data management, API management. Tines covers Story builder, Drag-and-drop workflows, Event triggers, Incident response automation. Both handle SOC2, GDPR, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Celigo: How much does Celigo cost?
Celigo pricing is not publicly disclosed; the vendor requires direct contact with sales to obtain pricing quotes based on your endpoint and workflow requirements.
SourceTines: What are Tines' pricing tiers?
Tines offers a free Community Edition for evaluation, Starter Edition at $500/month with annual billing, and Business/Enterprise tiers starting around $50,000/year for small security teams and scaling to $200,000+ for large SOCs.
SourceCeligo: What is Celigo's pricing model?
Celigo uses a flat-rate subscription model based on endpoints and flows, not per-transaction costs; customers must contact sales for actual pricing for each tier.
SourceTines: What is the Community Edition limited to?
As of July 2026, the free Community Edition is scoped to 1 builder and 3 flows as an evaluation tool to test Tines' capabilities.
SourceCeligo: Is there a free trial for Celigo?
Yes, Celigo offers a 30-day free trial with unlimited access to the platform; no credit card is required to start the trial.
SourceTines: Is Tines limited to security automation?
Yes, Tines is purpose-built for security automation. Teams needing non-security automation on the same orchestration layer would need to evaluate alternatives.
SourceCeligo: What are the Celigo pricing tiers?
Celigo offers Standard, Professional, and Enterprise editions; specific pricing for each is not published and requires sales contact, with Enterprise including unlimited endpoints and premium support.
SourceTines: Does Tines have native log intelligence capabilities?
No, Tines lacks a native log intelligence layer, meaning it cannot determine whether the data feeding your detection tools is complete. Teams must build automation against whatever alerts their existing infrastructure provides.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Celigo vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Celigo vs Zapier
- Celigo vs n8n
- Celigo vs MuleSoft
- Celigo vs Cyclr
- Celigo vs Workato
- Celigo vs Tray.io
- Celigo vs Boomi
- Celigo vs Automation Anywhere
- Celigo vs Jitterbit
- Celigo vs UiPath
- Celigo vs SnapLogic
- Celigo vs HighLevel
- Celigo vs Grouparoo
- Celigo vs Hatchet
- Celigo vs Hevo Data
- Celigo vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Celigo vs IBM MQ
- Celigo vs Parabola
- Celigo vs Nintex
- Celigo vs Automate.io
- Celigo vs Polytomic
- Celigo vs Autonoly
- Celigo vs Mage AI
- Celigo vs mParticle
- Celigo vs Alloy Automation
- Celigo vs Salesforce Flows
- Tines vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Tines vs Zapier
- Tines vs n8n
- Tines vs MuleSoft
- Tines vs Cyclr
- Tines vs Workato
- Tines vs Tray.io
- Tines vs Boomi
- Tines vs Automation Anywhere
- Tines vs Jitterbit
- Tines vs UiPath
- Tines vs SnapLogic
- Tines vs HighLevel
- Tines vs Grouparoo
- Tines vs Hatchet
- Tines vs Hevo Data
- Tines vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Tines vs IBM MQ
- Tines vs Parabola
- Tines vs Nintex
- Tines vs Automate.io
- Tines vs Polytomic
- Tines vs Autonoly
- Tines vs Mage AI
- Tines vs mParticle
- Tines vs Alloy Automation
- Tines vs Salesforce Flows

