Cloud · head to head
Heroku vs Wasabi
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Application hostingnot Wasabi
- Database as a servicenot Wasabi
- CI/CD pipelinesnot Wasabi
- API deploymentnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Heroku
- Media storagenot Heroku
- Archive replacementnot Heroku
- Ransomware protectionnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$5/month- Eco Dyno$5/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Git/Docker deploy
- Custom domains
- Basic Dyno$7/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Always-on
- Free SSL
- Standard-1X Dyno$25/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Horizontal scaling
- App metrics
- Standard-2X Dyno$50/month
- 1 GB RAM
- Horizontal scaling
- App metrics
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $5/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Wasabi?
- Heroku starts at $5/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does Heroku or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for application hosting, database as a service, ci/cd pipelines, api deployment. Of those, application hosting and database as a service are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Wasabi cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle Cloud deployment, Web support, Api support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Heroku: How much does Heroku cost?
Heroku dyno pricing starts at $5 per month USD for the Eco tier (with 30-minute inactivity sleep), $7 per month for Basic (always-on), and scales up to $1,500 per month for Performance-2XL with 126 GB RAM.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceHeroku: What is the cheapest always-on Heroku plan?
The Basic Dyno at $7 per month USD is Heroku's cheapest always-on container option. It provides 0.5 GB RAM, free SSL, and support for 10 process types.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceHeroku: How is Heroku Postgres priced?
Heroku Postgres Essential tier (shared resources) starts at $5-$20 per month for 1-32 GB disk. Standard tier (dedicated) ranges $50-$12,000 per month. Premium, Private, Shield, and Advanced tiers offer higher performance at corresponding prices.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Coolify
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs Dokku
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Porter
- Heroku vs SST
- Heroku vs Encore
- Heroku vs Zeabur
- Heroku vs Railway
- Heroku vs minikube
- Heroku vs Northflank
- Heroku vs Oracle Cloud
- Heroku vs Orca Security
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs OpenTelemetry
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Scaleway
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Google Cloud Platform
- Heroku vs Microsoft Azure
- Heroku vs HAProxy
- Heroku vs IBM Cloud
- Heroku vs kind
- Heroku vs Koyeb
- Heroku vs Kustomize
- Heroku vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Coolify
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs Dokku
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs SST
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Railway
- Wasabi vs minikube
- Wasabi vs Northflank
- Wasabi vs Oracle Cloud
- Wasabi vs Orca Security
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs OpenTelemetry
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


