Cloud · head to head
Crossplane vs Trilio

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Crossplane requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure; Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- They diverge on capability: Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Trilio covers OpenStack backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Crossplane and Trilio actually diverge.
| Attribute | Crossplane | Trilio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Per node per year |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP | Linux, Web |
| Category | Cloud | Backup |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Crossplane
- Kubernetes extension
- Custom API building
- Resource management anywhere
- Declarative interfaces
- Component library
- Provider ecosystem
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Crossplane
- Building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teamsnot Trilio
- Creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructurenot Trilio
- Designing declarative APIs for infrastructure provisioningnot Trilio
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot Crossplane
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot Crossplane
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot Crossplane
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot Crossplane
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Crossplane
- Requires Kubernetes expertise and infrastructure
- Steep learning curve for teams new to Kubernetes patterns
- Provider ecosystem smaller than Terraform
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
Crossplane
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Crossplane review.
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Which should you pick?
Choose Crossplane if
- You need kubernetes extension.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want custom api building.
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Questions people ask
- Is Crossplane or Trilio better?
- Neither clearly leads. Crossplane starts at Free and Trilio at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Crossplane or Trilio?
- Crossplane starts at Free and Trilio at Free.
- Does Crossplane or Trilio run on more platforms?
- Crossplane runs on Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP. Trilio runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use Crossplane for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Crossplane best used for?
- Crossplane is most often used for building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams, creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure, designing declarative apis for infrastructure provisioning. Of those, building platform-as-a-service offerings for internal teams and creating unified control layers for multi-cloud infrastructure are not what Trilio is typically brought in for.
- What can Crossplane do that Trilio cannot?
- Crossplane covers Kubernetes extension, Custom API building, Resource management anywhere, Declarative interfaces. Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Crossplane: Is Crossplane free?
Yes, Crossplane is open source and free to use. It requires a Kubernetes cluster but has no licensing costs.
SourceTrilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
Crossplane: What is Crossplane used for?
Crossplane is used to build control planes and platforms for infrastructure management, enabling platform teams to expose safe APIs to other teams.
SourceTrilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Crossplane vs Pulumi
- Crossplane vs containerd
- Crossplane vs Nitric
- Crossplane vs Vault
- Crossplane vs Portworx
- Crossplane vs Microsoft Azure
- Crossplane vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Crossplane vs DigitalOcean
- Crossplane vs Podman
- Crossplane vs K3s
- Crossplane vs OpenEBS
- Crossplane vs OVHcloud
- Crossplane vs Puppet
- Crossplane vs Cilium
- Crossplane vs Nomad
- Crossplane vs Velero
- Crossplane vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Crossplane vs Portworx Backup
- Crossplane vs HYCU
- Crossplane vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Crossplane vs BDRShield
- Crossplane vs CloudCasa
- Crossplane vs Kopia
- Crossplane vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Crossplane vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Crossplane vs Redstor
- Crossplane vs rustic
- Crossplane vs HPE StoreOnce
- Crossplane vs MSP360 Backup
- Crossplane vs N-able Backup
- Crossplane vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs Pulumi
- Trilio vs containerd
- Trilio vs Nitric
- Trilio vs Vault
- Trilio vs Portworx
- Trilio vs Microsoft Azure
- Trilio vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Trilio vs DigitalOcean
- Trilio vs Podman
- Trilio vs K3s
- Trilio vs OpenEBS
- Trilio vs OVHcloud
- Trilio vs Puppet
- Trilio vs Cilium
- Trilio vs Nomad
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs HYCU
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs CloudCasa
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs OwnBackup

