Technology · head to head
Supabase vs TiDB

TiDB
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed SQL database with MySQL wire compatibility and a separate columnar replica for analytical queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity; TiDB a production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- They diverge on capability: Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Supabase and TiDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
Only in TiDB
- MySQL wire compatibility
- Horizontal write scaling
- Distributed ACID transactions
- TiFlash columnar replica
- Automatic rebalancing
- Raft replication
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Online schema change
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot TiDB
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot TiDB
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot TiDB
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot TiDB
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot TiDB
TiDB
- A MySQL workload that has hit the write ceiling of a single primary and would otherwise need an application-level sharding layernot Supabase
- Reporting that must run against current transactional data, where the columnar replica removes the delay and the cost of an ETL pipelinenot Supabase
- Multi-region deployments needing a single logical database with automatic failover rather than manual primary promotionnot Supabase
- Migrating off a sharded MySQL estate where the sharding logic in the application has become the main source of bugs and operational toilnot Supabase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
TiDB
- A production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- Every transaction takes a timestamp from the placement driver and crosses the network to storage nodes, so simple point queries are slower than on single-node MySQL and latency-sensitive paths need to be measured, not assumed.
- MySQL compatibility is at the wire and dialect level but not complete; stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, so an application that pushed logic into the database cannot simply be repointed.
- The columnar replica is an extra full copy of the data on its own nodes, so hybrid analytics roughly doubles storage and adds hardware that must be sized and paid for separately.
- Operating it well requires cluster-specific expertise in TiUP or the Kubernetes operator, region hot spots, and rebalancing behaviour, so the licence is free but the running cost includes an engineer who understands distributed storage.
Pricing, plan by plan
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
TiDB
Free- ServerlessFree
- 5GB storage
- 50M request units
- Free forever tier
- Dedicated$250/month
- Dedicated resources
- SLA guarantees
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Choose TiDB if
- You need mysql wire compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- You also want horizontal write scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is Supabase or TiDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Supabase starts at Free and TiDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Supabase or TiDB?
- Supabase starts at Free and TiDB at Free.
- Does Supabase or TiDB run on more platforms?
- Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android. TiDB runs on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- Can I use Supabase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Supabase best used for?
- Supabase is most often used for web application backends using postgres plus auto-generated rest/graphql apis, mobile app backends via flutter/swift/kotlin client libraries, ai applications using vector/embeddings storage, authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/password. Of those, web application backends using postgres plus auto-generated rest/graphql apis and mobile app backends via flutter/swift/kotlin client libraries are not what TiDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Supabase do that TiDB cannot?
- Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions. TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility, Horizontal write scaling, Distributed ACID transactions, TiFlash columnar replica.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceTiDB: Is TiDB a drop-in replacement for MySQL?
At the protocol and dialect level it is close, and most applications connect unchanged. Stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, and latency characteristics differ, so it needs testing rather than assumption.
Supabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceTiDB: What licence is it under?
Apache 2.0, for both TiDB and the underlying TiKV storage engine. TiKV is a graduated CNCF project, which is a meaningful governance signal in a market where several competitors moved to source-available licences.
TiDB: Do I need TiFlash?
Only for analytical queries. It is an optional columnar replica; without it TiDB is a distributed transactional database. With it you get analytics on live data at the cost of an additional full copy.
TiDB: Is the managed cloud the same software?
TiDB Cloud runs the same engine, with the control plane, scaling and operational tooling provided as a service. The entry tier is metered differently from a dedicated cluster, so the cost model rather than the engine is what changes.
TiDB: When is TiDB the wrong choice?
When the database is small enough for one server, when latency on single-row lookups is the primary constraint, or when the application depends on MySQL stored procedures and triggers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Postgres
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Excalidraw
- Supabase vs MongoDB
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs GitHub
- Supabase vs Apache Hadoop
- Supabase vs Height
- Supabase vs Honeycomb
- Supabase vs Istio
- Supabase vs Lucidchart
- Supabase vs GitHub Desktop
- Supabase vs Cockroach Labs
- Supabase vs Vitess
- Supabase vs Elasticsearch
- Supabase vs SingleStore
- Supabase vs BigQuery
- Supabase vs DuckDB
- Supabase vs Amazon Redshift
- Supabase vs ClickHouse
- Supabase vs Apache Druid
- Supabase vs Couchbase
- Supabase vs MariaDB
- Supabase vs TimescaleDB
- Supabase vs Redpanda
- Supabase vs RisingWave
- Supabase vs ScyllaDB
- Supabase vs Solace PubSub+
- Supabase vs SQLite
- Supabase vs StarRocks
- TiDB vs Asana
- TiDB vs ClickUp
- TiDB vs Figma
- TiDB vs Linear
- TiDB vs Postgres
- TiDB vs Redis
- TiDB vs Excalidraw
- TiDB vs MongoDB
- TiDB vs Notion
- TiDB vs PostHog
- TiDB vs GitHub
- TiDB vs Apache Hadoop
- TiDB vs Height
- TiDB vs Honeycomb
- TiDB vs Istio
- TiDB vs Lucidchart
- TiDB vs GitHub Desktop
- TiDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TiDB vs Vitess
- TiDB vs Elasticsearch
- TiDB vs SingleStore
- TiDB vs BigQuery
- TiDB vs DuckDB
- TiDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TiDB vs ClickHouse
- TiDB vs Apache Druid
- TiDB vs Couchbase
- TiDB vs MariaDB
- TiDB vs TimescaleDB
- TiDB vs Redpanda
- TiDB vs RisingWave
- TiDB vs ScyllaDB
- TiDB vs Solace PubSub+
- TiDB vs SQLite
- TiDB vs StarRocks

