Cybersecurity · head to head
March Networks vs Ping Identity

March Networks
Cybersecurity
Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: March Networks the ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which March Networks and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | March Networks | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in March Networks
- Command Enterprise
- Searchlight
- Hybrid recording
- X-Series hybrid NVRs
- Health monitoring
- ATM and teller integration
- Retail loss prevention analytics
- Evidence export
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
March Networks
- A bank investigating a disputed ATM withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timelinenot Ping Identity
- A credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and IP cameras must coexist on one recordernot Ping Identity
- A restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locationsnot Ping Identity
- A transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the networknot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot March Networks
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot March Networks
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot March Networks
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot March Networks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
March Networks
- The ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- NDAA compliance is stated at the product level and rests on American system-on-chip processors in the majority of cameras and in specific recorder lines, which means it must be confirmed per model rather than assumed across the catalogue.
- The platform is engineered around banking and retail workflows, so buyers outside those verticals pay for transaction integration they will never use and get a less developed general security experience than from a Genetec or Milestone.
- No pricing is published and everything is quoted through integrators, so a multi-hundred-site estate cannot be budgeted without a design exercise and there is no benchmark against which to test a quote.
- Hybrid recording means a recorder in every branch, which is hardware to install, monitor, service and eventually replace at every location, and that refresh cycle is a recurring capital event that cloud rivals avoid entirely.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
March Networks
On request- Command Enterprise and Searchlight$undefined/year
- Per-recorder and per-channel licensing quoted through integrators
- Searchlight business intelligence licensed separately
- X-Series hybrid recorders purchased per site
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose March Networks if
- You need command enterprise.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want searchlight.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is March Networks or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. March Networks starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, March Networks or Ping Identity?
- March Networks starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does March Networks or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- March Networks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is March Networks best used for?
- March Networks is most often used for a bank investigating a disputed atm withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timeline, a credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and ip cameras must coexist on one recorder, a restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locations, a transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the network. Of those, a bank investigating a disputed atm withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timeline and a credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and ip cameras must coexist on one recorder are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can March Networks do that Ping Identity cannot?
- March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Searchlight, Hybrid recording, X-Series hybrid NVRs. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
March Networks: Who owns March Networks?
Delta Electronics of Taiwan, which acquired it in December 2021 for 114 million US dollars. Before that it was owned by Chinese manufacturer Infinova, which by January 2020 had a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
March Networks: Is March Networks NDAA compliant?
The company states it is, citing American system-on-chip processors in the majority of its cameras and in its Command Recording Server bundles and X-Series hybrid NVRs. Verify per model, and expect the ownership history to be raised in a federal procurement review.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
March Networks: What is Searchlight?
The layer that overlays ATM, teller and point of sale transaction data on video so investigators search by transaction rather than by time.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
March Networks: Is video stored in the cloud?
No, it is hybrid. Video is recorded on a recorder at each site and only required clips move centrally, which is why it suits large branch estates on modest connections.
Related pages
More on March Networks
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- March Networks vs Envysion
- March Networks vs Eagle Eye Networks
- March Networks vs Dahua Technology
- March Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- March Networks vs DTiQ
- March Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- March Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- March Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- March Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- March Networks vs Camio
- March Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- March Networks vs ExpressVPN
- March Networks vs Fortinet FortiGate
- March Networks vs HID Global
- March Networks vs IBM QRadar
- March Networks vs Jamf Pro
- March Networks vs Keeper Password Manager
- March Networks vs Keygen
- March Networks vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- March Networks vs Frontegg
- March Networks vs Speakeasy
- March Networks vs Akeyless
- March Networks vs authentik
- March Networks vs Logto
- March Networks vs Authelia
- March Networks vs Transmit Security
- March Networks vs Delinea
- March Networks vs VMware Carbon Black
- March Networks vs Yoti
- March Networks vs Avast One
- March Networks vs Chainguard
- March Networks vs Cosign
- March Networks vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Envysion
- Ping Identity vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Ping Identity vs Dahua Technology
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs DTiQ
- Ping Identity vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Ping Identity vs Salient CompleteView
- Ping Identity vs Hanwha Vision
- Ping Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Ping Identity vs Camio
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Ping Identity vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Ping Identity vs HID Global
- Ping Identity vs IBM QRadar
- Ping Identity vs Jamf Pro
- Ping Identity vs Keeper Password Manager
- Ping Identity vs Keygen
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
