APIs · head to head
Paw vs Solaris

Paw
APIs
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- From
- $99/one-time
- Rated
- -

Solaris
APIs
German banking as a service with a full banking licence and a live regulatory problem
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Paw no specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers; Solaris baFin appointed a special representative in 2022 and extended the mandate in July 2024, so a partner is joining a bank under active supervisory monitoring, with slower approvals and heavier compliance demands as a direct consequence.
- They diverge on capability: Paw covers REST Client, Solaris covers German banking licence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Paw and Solaris actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Paw
- REST Client
- Scripting
- Dynamic Values
- Slack
- GitHub
- Custom extensions
- MacOS support
Only in Solaris
- German banking licence
- IBAN accounts
- Card issuing
- Lending as a service
- Digital assets and custody
- SEPA payments
- KYC and onboarding
- Deposit protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Paw
- API Developmentnot Solaris
- API Gatewaynot Solaris
- API Testingnot Solaris
- API Documentationnot Solaris
- Microservicesnot Solaris
Solaris
- A retailer or platform launching a German current account or card product without applying for its own licencenot Paw
- A fintech that needs deposit taking and lending, which an e-money licence cannot providenot Paw
- A European business needing German IBANs because customers reject foreign IBANs for salary and direct debitnot Paw
- A company requiring German statutory deposit protection on customer balances as a product claimnot Paw
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Paw
- No specific pricing amounts published for subscription tiers
- Individual and volume licensing requires direct contact
- Limited details on team subscription pricing
Solaris
- BaFin appointed a special representative in 2022 and extended the mandate in July 2024, so a partner is joining a bank under active supervisory monitoring, with slower approvals and heavier compliance demands as a direct consequence.
- BaFin fined Solaris EUR 6.5 million in March 2024 for systematically late suspicious activity reports and EUR 500,000 for breaching large exposure limits between January 2022 and March 2024, which is a track record a partner inherits reputationally.
- Solaris has previously needed BaFin approval before onboarding new corporate clients, which can turn a commercial decision to launch into a regulatory timetable outside your control.
- The 2024 restructuring involved job cuts and the closure of parts of a business unit, so product lines a partner depends on may not have the engineering behind them that the sales process implies.
- SBI Holdings acquired majority control in 2025, so strategic direction now sits with a Japanese financial group whose priorities for the European business may differ from the roadmap you were sold.
Pricing, plan by plan
Paw
$99/one-time- Standard$99/one-time
- Full REST client
- Advanced scripting
- Extensions
- Annual License$49/yearly
- All features
- Updates
- Priority support
Solaris
On request- Solaris banking as a service$undefined/year
- Quoted per partner, typically setup fee plus monthly platform fee
- Per account, per card and per transaction charges on top
- Interchange sharing arrangements negotiated per programme
Which should you pick?
Choose Solaris if
- You need german banking licence.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want iban accounts.
Questions people ask
- Is Paw or Solaris better?
- Neither clearly leads. Paw starts at $99/one-time and Solaris at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Paw or Solaris?
- Paw starts at $99/one-time and Solaris at On request.
- Does Paw or Solaris run on more platforms?
- Paw runs on MacOS. Solaris runs on Web, API.
- What is Paw best used for?
- Paw is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Solaris is typically brought in for.
- What can Paw do that Solaris cannot?
- Paw covers REST Client, Scripting, Dynamic Values, Slack. Solaris covers German banking licence, IBAN accounts, Card issuing, Lending as a service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Paw: How much does RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) cost?
Paw offers a free tier for personal and professional use. Paid subscription plans are available on monthly and yearly billing, but specific pricing amounts are not disclosed and require direct contact with RapidAPI.
SourceSolaris: Does Solaris have a real banking licence?
Yes. Solaris SE is a German credit institution, which is why it can offer deposits and lending, unlike e-money based competitors.
Paw: Is there a free version of Paw?
Yes, RapidAPI for Mac (Paw) is free for both personal and professional use.
SourceSolaris: Is the BaFin action still live?
The special representative appointed in 2022 had the mandate extended in July 2024, and fines were issued in March 2024. Treat supervisory oversight as an active condition in your diligence.
Paw: What features are included in the free version of Paw?
The free tier includes HTTP client capabilities for API testing, API documentation, personal sync across devices, and support for Swagger, RAML, and API Blueprint formats.
SourceSolaris: Who owns Solaris now?
SBI Holdings of Japan agreed in December 2024 and January 2025 to take a majority stake of over seventy per cent for around EUR 100 million.
Paw: What additional features do Paw team subscriptions include?
Team subscription plans include all personal features plus collaborative tools, team project access, synchronized workflows with safe data merges, and real-time notifications and updates.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Paw vs Appwrite
- Paw vs Sanity
- Paw vs PocketBase
- Paw vs Apidog
- Paw vs Hasura
- Paw vs REST Client VSCode
- Paw vs Thunder Client
- Paw vs Hoppscotch
- Paw vs HTTPie
- Paw vs Griffin
- Paw vs KeystoneJS
- Paw vs Basis Theory
- Paw vs Astra
- Paw vs Asyncapi
- Paw vs AWS API Gateway
- Paw vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Paw vs Unit
- Paw vs Toqio
- Paw vs Vodeno
- Paw vs Weavr
- Paw vs Swan
- Paw vs Treasury Prime
- Paw vs Fintech Farm
- Paw vs Synctera
- Paw vs Codat
- Paw vs Sila
- Paw vs LiteLLM
- Paw vs Method Financial
- Paw vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Paw vs Neonomics
- Paw vs Payload CMS
- Paw vs Portkey
- Solaris vs Appwrite
- Solaris vs Sanity
- Solaris vs PocketBase
- Solaris vs Apidog
- Solaris vs Hasura
- Solaris vs REST Client VSCode
- Solaris vs Thunder Client
- Solaris vs Hoppscotch
- Solaris vs HTTPie
- Solaris vs Griffin
- Solaris vs KeystoneJS
- Solaris vs Basis Theory
- Solaris vs Astra
- Solaris vs Asyncapi
- Solaris vs AWS API Gateway
- Solaris vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Solaris vs Unit
- Solaris vs Toqio
- Solaris vs Vodeno
- Solaris vs Weavr
- Solaris vs Swan
- Solaris vs Treasury Prime
- Solaris vs Fintech Farm
- Solaris vs Synctera
- Solaris vs Codat
- Solaris vs Sila
- Solaris vs LiteLLM
- Solaris vs Method Financial
- Solaris vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Solaris vs Neonomics
- Solaris vs Payload CMS
- Solaris vs Portkey
