Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs Xlinesoft

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Xlinesoft
Developer Tools
PHPRunner and ASPRunner.NET: low-code builders that turn databases into web apps
- From
- $599/one-time
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; Xlinesoft the purchase includes one year of support and upgrades only; after that, newer versions require a paid upgrade.
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Xlinesoft covers Database to web application.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 12 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and Xlinesoft actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in Xlinesoft
- Database to web application
- Page Designer and themes
- Events, custom code and AI assistance
- Security and dynamic permissions
- Reports, charts and dashboards
- Wide database support
- Enterprise authentication
- Application templates and plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Xlinesoft
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Xlinesoft
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Xlinesoft
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Xlinesoft
Xlinesoft
- Building an internal web application on top of an existing SQL databasenot OWASP ZAP
- Replacing a Microsoft Access application with a browser-based onenot OWASP ZAP
- Creating admin interfaces and customer or partner portals with role-based accessnot OWASP ZAP
- Agencies and freelancers delivering self-hosted database applications to clientsnot OWASP ZAP
- Teams that need low-code tooling but must keep applications on their own serversnot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Xlinesoft
- The purchase includes one year of support and upgrades only; after that, newer versions require a paid upgrade.
- Multiple database connections, REST API connections and single sign-on through Active Directory, Okta or SAML are Enterprise-only, which raises the price from $599 to $999 per developer.
- Self-hosted only. Hosting, database administration, backups, runtime updates and access-control configuration remain the customer's job, as Xlinesoft's own product facts page states.
- Applications built on Microsoft Access require a Windows web server.
- PHPRunner and ASPRunner.NET are separate products with separate licences, so moving a project between PHP and .NET is not covered by one purchase.
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Xlinesoft
$599/one-time- PHPRunner Professional$599/one-time
- Single developer licence
- Core application-building product
- One year of email support and upgrades
- PHPRunner Enterprise Edition$999/one-time
- Single developer licence
- Multiple database and REST API connections
- Data encryption
- PHPRunner MultiDev Edition$3599/one-time
- Three Enterprise Edition licences
- Multiple developers working on the same project at the same time
- One year of email support and upgrades
- ASPRunner.NET Professional$599/one-time
- Generates ASP.NET web applications
- Same database coverage and security model as PHPRunner
- Enterprise Edition available
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose Xlinesoft if
- You need database to web application.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want page designer and themes.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or Xlinesoft better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and Xlinesoft at $599/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or Xlinesoft?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and $599/one-time for Xlinesoft.
- Does OWASP ZAP or Xlinesoft run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. Xlinesoft runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Xlinesoft starts at $599/one-time.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what Xlinesoft is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that Xlinesoft cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. Xlinesoft covers Database to web application, Page Designer and themes, Events, custom code and AI assistance, Security and dynamic permissions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Xlinesoft: How much does PHPRunner cost?
PHPRunner Professional is $599, Enterprise Edition is $999 and MultiDev Edition, which includes three Enterprise licences, is $3,599. Professional and Enterprise prices are per developer, and each purchase includes one year of email support and free upgrades.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Xlinesoft: Which databases does PHPRunner support?
MySQL, MariaDB, Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Oracle, Microsoft Access, IBM DB2, Informix, SQLite and ODBC-compatible databases. Using multiple database connections in one project is an Enterprise Edition feature.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Xlinesoft: Is there a free trial?
Yes. PHPRunner can be downloaded and evaluated for 21 days, and public live demos show the generated applications, with add, edit and delete disabled.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
Xlinesoft: Where do PHPRunner applications run?
On your own web server. The documented options are Apache and Microsoft IIS with a compatible PHP runtime and database extensions, and a built-in web server is available for local testing. The development application itself runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.
SourceOWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Xlinesoft: What does the Enterprise Edition add?
Multiple database and REST API connections, data encryption, and enterprise authentication including Active Directory, Okta, Azure AD, OpenID and SAML, on top of all Professional features.
SourceXlinesoft: What is ASPRunner.NET?
Xlinesoft's equivalent builder for ASP.NET. It generates database-driven ASP.NET web applications with the same kind of forms, reports, charts, permissions and Page Designer, and is sold separately from $599.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Coder
- OWASP ZAP vs Soketi
- OWASP ZAP vs Frappe
- OWASP ZAP vs Penpot
- OWASP ZAP vs PhpStorm
- OWASP ZAP vs Keycloak
- OWASP ZAP vs Buildkite
- OWASP ZAP vs Atlantis
- OWASP ZAP vs Visual Studio Code
- OWASP ZAP vs Depot
- OWASP ZAP vs Blacksmith
- OWASP ZAP vs GitLab CI/CD
- OWASP ZAP vs Warp
- OWASP ZAP vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- OWASP ZAP vs GNU Emacs
- OWASP ZAP vs Keil MDK
- OWASP ZAP vs Vite
- OWASP ZAP vs Bazel
- Xlinesoft vs 1Password
- Xlinesoft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Xlinesoft vs Norton 360
- Xlinesoft vs LastPass
- Xlinesoft vs Bitwarden
- Xlinesoft vs Burp Suite
- Xlinesoft vs Metasploit
- Xlinesoft vs Wireshark
- Xlinesoft vs authentik
- Xlinesoft vs Authelia
- Xlinesoft vs Infisical
- Xlinesoft vs Trivy
- Xlinesoft vs Feedzai
- Xlinesoft vs Frontegg
- Xlinesoft vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Xlinesoft vs JumpCloud
- Xlinesoft vs McAfee Total Protection
- Xlinesoft vs Coder
- Xlinesoft vs Soketi
- Xlinesoft vs Frappe
- Xlinesoft vs Penpot
- Xlinesoft vs PhpStorm
- Xlinesoft vs Keycloak
- Xlinesoft vs Buildkite
- Xlinesoft vs Atlantis
- Xlinesoft vs Visual Studio Code
- Xlinesoft vs Depot
- Xlinesoft vs Blacksmith
- Xlinesoft vs GitLab CI/CD
- Xlinesoft vs Warp
- Xlinesoft vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Xlinesoft vs GNU Emacs
- Xlinesoft vs Keil MDK
- Xlinesoft vs Vite
- Xlinesoft vs Bazel
