Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs WSO2 API Manager

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

WSO2 API Manager
APIs
Complete API management platform for designing and managing APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; WSO2 API Manager the free open source distribution does not include a subscription to the WSO2 Update service, so continuous improvements and security patches require a paid subscription
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, WSO2 API Manager covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and WSO2 API Manager actually diverge.
| Attribute | OWASP ZAP | WSO2 API Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | open-source |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli, Api | Java, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | APIs |
| Founded | 2001 | 2005 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in WSO2 API Manager
- API Gateway
- API Designer
- Developer Portal
- LDAP
- Okta
- Keycloak
- Microservices
- Java support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot WSO2 API Manager
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot WSO2 API Manager
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot WSO2 API Manager
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot WSO2 API Manager
WSO2 API Manager
- Publishing, securing and rate limiting APIs behind a gatewaynot OWASP ZAP
- Running an API developer portal with subscription key managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Self hosting an open source API management layer on premisesnot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
WSO2 API Manager
- The free open source distribution does not include a subscription to the WSO2 Update service, so continuous improvements and security patches require a paid subscription
- A commercial production licence is not part of the free download and comes only with a subscription
- No subscription price is published; Basic Support and Enterprise Support both require contacting sales for a quote
- 24x7x365 coverage requires Enterprise Support; the general query SLA is one business day
- A Customer Success Manager is a paid optional add on covering business hours only
- Consulting services and WSO2 Private Cloud hosting are quoted separately
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
WSO2 API Manager
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API management
- Community support
- Commercial$undefined/monthly
- Enterprise features
- Technical support
- SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose WSO2 API Manager if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want api designer.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or WSO2 API Manager better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and WSO2 API Manager at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or WSO2 API Manager?
- OWASP ZAP starts at Free and WSO2 API Manager at Free.
- Does OWASP ZAP or WSO2 API Manager run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. WSO2 API Manager runs on Java, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what WSO2 API Manager is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that WSO2 API Manager cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. WSO2 API Manager covers API Gateway, API Designer, Developer Portal, LDAP.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
WSO2 API Manager: How is WSO2 API Manager priced?
WSO2 API Manager pricing is not published on their website. As an enterprise API management platform, pricing is custom-quoted based on deployment model and organizational requirements.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
WSO2 API Manager: Does WSO2 API Manager offer different pricing for on-premises versus cloud deployments?
WSO2 API Manager supports multiple deployment options including on-premises and cloud, but pricing structures for different deployment models are not publicly disclosed.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
WSO2 API Manager: What deployment flexibility does WSO2 API Manager provide?
WSO2 API Manager enables flexible deployment on-premises or in cloud environments, but specific pricing tiers for each deployment model require contacting WSO2 sales.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
WSO2 API Manager: How would I request a WSO2 API Manager pricing quote?
Organizations can request pricing quotes by contacting WSO2 sales through their website. Custom quotes depend on API volume, deployment model, and feature requirements.
SourceOWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on WSO2 API Manager
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs TIBCO Mashery
- OWASP ZAP vs Appwrite
- OWASP ZAP vs Hasura
- OWASP ZAP vs PocketBase
- OWASP ZAP vs Sanity
- OWASP ZAP vs Apigee
- OWASP ZAP vs 3scale
- OWASP ZAP vs Akana
- OWASP ZAP vs Kong
- OWASP ZAP vs Boomi API Management
- OWASP ZAP vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- OWASP ZAP vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- OWASP ZAP vs Directus
- OWASP ZAP vs Dwolla
- OWASP ZAP vs Enable Banking
- OWASP ZAP vs Flybits
- OWASP ZAP vs i2c
- OWASP ZAP vs KeystoneJS
- WSO2 API Manager vs 1Password
- WSO2 API Manager vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WSO2 API Manager vs Norton 360
- WSO2 API Manager vs LastPass
- WSO2 API Manager vs Bitwarden
- WSO2 API Manager vs Burp Suite
- WSO2 API Manager vs Metasploit
- WSO2 API Manager vs Wireshark
- WSO2 API Manager vs authentik
- WSO2 API Manager vs Authelia
- WSO2 API Manager vs Infisical
- WSO2 API Manager vs Trivy
- WSO2 API Manager vs Feedzai
- WSO2 API Manager vs Frontegg
- WSO2 API Manager vs HashiCorp Boundary
- WSO2 API Manager vs JumpCloud
- WSO2 API Manager vs McAfee Total Protection
- WSO2 API Manager vs TIBCO Mashery
- WSO2 API Manager vs Appwrite
- WSO2 API Manager vs Hasura
- WSO2 API Manager vs PocketBase
- WSO2 API Manager vs Sanity
- WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee
- WSO2 API Manager vs 3scale
- WSO2 API Manager vs Akana
- WSO2 API Manager vs Kong
- WSO2 API Manager vs Boomi API Management
- WSO2 API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- WSO2 API Manager vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- WSO2 API Manager vs Directus
- WSO2 API Manager vs Dwolla
- WSO2 API Manager vs Enable Banking
- WSO2 API Manager vs Flybits
- WSO2 API Manager vs i2c
- WSO2 API Manager vs KeystoneJS
