Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs SonicWall
OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
SonicWall
Cybersecurity
Proven security, performance and simplicity for modern networks
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; SonicWall product line page names no price for any firewall model, series or bundled security service
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and SonicWall actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in SonicWall
Nothing recorded that OWASP ZAP does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot SonicWall
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot SonicWall
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot SonicWall
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot SonicWall
SonicWall
- Network security and firewallsnot OWASP ZAP
- Cloud securitynot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
SonicWall
- Product line page names no price for any firewall model, series or bundled security service
- Product tiers are segmented strictly by business size (TZ80 for micro-SMBs up to NSsp for large enterprises), so a growing business must migrate hardware series rather than scale within one model
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
SonicWall
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the SonicWall review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose SonicWall if
Nothing in the data separates SonicWall from OWASP ZAP on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or SonicWall better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and SonicWall at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or SonicWall?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and On request for SonicWall.
- Does OWASP ZAP or SonicWall run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. SonicWall runs on Web.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SonicWall starts at On request.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what SonicWall is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that SonicWall cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
SonicWall: How much does SonicWall cost?
SonicWall does not publish pricing on its main website. The company directs customers to contact their sales team directly or access the partner portal for reseller pricing. Free trials are available through their sales channels.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
SonicWall: Does SonicWall offer a free trial?
Yes, SonicWall offers free trials for their products. Contact their sales team through the Contact Sales button to request trial access and pricing information.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs WireGuard
- OWASP ZAP vs Akeyless
- OWASP ZAP vs Fortinet FortiGate
- OWASP ZAP vs Eagle Eye Networks
- OWASP ZAP vs Genetec Security Center
- OWASP ZAP vs March Networks
- OWASP ZAP vs NICE Actimize
- OWASP ZAP vs HID Global
- OWASP ZAP vs Silent Eight
- OWASP ZAP vs Socket
- OWASP ZAP vs Socure
- OWASP ZAP vs Sophos Intercept X
- OWASP ZAP vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Sticky Password
- SonicWall vs 1Password
- SonicWall vs Bitdefender Total Security
- SonicWall vs Norton 360
- SonicWall vs LastPass
- SonicWall vs Bitwarden
- SonicWall vs Burp Suite
- SonicWall vs Metasploit
- SonicWall vs Wireshark
- SonicWall vs authentik
- SonicWall vs Authelia
- SonicWall vs Infisical
- SonicWall vs Trivy
- SonicWall vs Feedzai
- SonicWall vs Frontegg
- SonicWall vs HashiCorp Boundary
- SonicWall vs JumpCloud
- SonicWall vs McAfee Total Protection
- SonicWall vs WireGuard
- SonicWall vs Akeyless
- SonicWall vs Fortinet FortiGate
- SonicWall vs Eagle Eye Networks
- SonicWall vs Genetec Security Center
- SonicWall vs March Networks
- SonicWall vs NICE Actimize
- SonicWall vs HID Global
- SonicWall vs Silent Eight
- SonicWall vs Socket
- SonicWall vs Socure
- SonicWall vs Sophos Intercept X
- SonicWall vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- SonicWall vs Sticky Password