Networking · head to head
OpenVPN vs PostgreSQL

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PostgreSQL
Databases
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: OpenVPN covers Open source core, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenVPN and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenVPN | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source core is free; Access Server billed per simultaneous connection | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Category | Networking | Databases |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot PostgreSQL
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot PostgreSQL
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot PostgreSQL
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot OpenVPN
- Data storagenot OpenVPN
- Application backendnot OpenVPN
- Reportingnot OpenVPN
- Data analyticsnot OpenVPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenVPN or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenVPN starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenVPN or PostgreSQL?
- OpenVPN starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free.
- Does OpenVPN or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use OpenVPN for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenVPN best used for?
- OpenVPN is most often used for a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship, a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee, an organisation with more staff than typical concurrent vpn usage, since access server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accounts, an iot or large-scale deployment needing custom enterprise pricing above 2,000 connections. Of those, a technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured vpn server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationship and a small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer vpn server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employee are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenVPN do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
PostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourceOpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
PostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourceOpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
PostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourcePostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourcePostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs MariaDB
- OpenVPN vs Oracle Database
- OpenVPN vs Microsoft SQL Server
- OpenVPN vs IBM Db2
- OpenVPN vs Cockroach Labs
- OpenVPN vs DuckDB
- OpenVPN vs Aiven
- OpenVPN vs SQLite
- OpenVPN vs Couchbase
- OpenVPN vs QuestDB
- OpenVPN vs FaunaDB
- OpenVPN vs Firestore
- OpenVPN vs Amazon Redshift
- OpenVPN vs Apache Pinot
- OpenVPN vs DataGrip
- OpenVPN vs Apache Pulsar
- OpenVPN vs Cassandra
- OpenVPN vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs pfSense
- PostgreSQL vs ZeroTier
- PostgreSQL vs MikroTik RouterOS
- PostgreSQL vs Tailscale
- PostgreSQL vs Icinga
- PostgreSQL vs Zabbix
- PostgreSQL vs Domotz
- PostgreSQL vs LibreNMS
- PostgreSQL vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- PostgreSQL vs Twingate
- PostgreSQL vs Consul
- PostgreSQL vs OPNsense
- PostgreSQL vs Nebula
- PostgreSQL vs ngrok
- PostgreSQL vs Palo Alto Networks
- PostgreSQL vs Splunk
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PostgreSQL vs IBM Db2
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs Aiven
- PostgreSQL vs SQLite
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs QuestDB
- PostgreSQL vs FaunaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firestore
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pinot
- PostgreSQL vs DataGrip
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pulsar
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB
