Databases · head to head
Memcached vs OpenVPN

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and OpenVPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | Memcached | OpenVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately | Open source core is free; Access Server billed per simultaneous connection |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted | Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android |
| Category | Databases | Networking |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot OpenVPN
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot OpenVPN
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Memcached
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Memcached
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Memcached
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or OpenVPN?
- Memcached starts at Free and OpenVPN at Free.
- Does Memcached or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that OpenVPN cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Memcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Memcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs pfSense
- Memcached vs ZeroTier
- Memcached vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Memcached vs Tailscale
- Memcached vs Icinga
- Memcached vs Zabbix
- Memcached vs Domotz
- Memcached vs LibreNMS
- Memcached vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Memcached vs Twingate
- Memcached vs Consul
- Memcached vs OPNsense
- Memcached vs Nebula
- Memcached vs ngrok
- Memcached vs Palo Alto Networks
- Memcached vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Dragonfly
- OpenVPN vs Valkey
- OpenVPN vs Readyset
- OpenVPN vs PostgreSQL
- OpenVPN vs DuckDB
- OpenVPN vs DynamoDB
- OpenVPN vs NATS
- OpenVPN vs Apache Pulsar
- OpenVPN vs Presto
- OpenVPN vs Timeplus
- OpenVPN vs RabbitMQ
- OpenVPN vs EMQX
- OpenVPN vs FaunaDB
- OpenVPN vs Firebase Realtime Database
- OpenVPN vs MotherDuck
- OpenVPN vs Neo4j
- OpenVPN vs Apache Kafka
- OpenVPN vs Firestore
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
