Construction · head to head
Openspace vs RealityScan

Openspace
Construction
AI-powered construction photo documentation
- From
- $2500/month
- Rated
- -

RealityScan
CAD
The photogrammetry engine formerly called RealityCapture, free below a one million dollar revenue line
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only RealityScan has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Openspace requires specialized 360-degree camera hardware for optimal documentation workflow; RealityScan the free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- They diverge on capability: Openspace covers 360 photo capture, RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Openspace and RealityScan actually diverge.
| Attribute | Openspace | RealityScan |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2500/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Free below a revenue threshold, then per seat per year |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Windows |
| Category | Construction | CAD |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Openspace
- 360 photo capture
- BIM compare
- Progress tracking
- AI analysis
- Measurement tools
- Procore
- Autodesk BIM 360
- PlanGrid
Only in RealityScan
- Photogrammetric reconstruction
- Laser scan fusion
- Ground control points
- Texturing and unwrapping
- Command line interface
- Unreal Engine path
- Component alignment control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Openspace
- Site documentationnot RealityScan
- Progress trackingnot RealityScan
- Quality controlnot RealityScan
- Dispute resolutionnot RealityScan
RealityScan
- A two-person heritage survey practice under the revenue threshold that can now run professional photogrammetry at no licence costnot Openspace
- A film or games asset team scanning props and environments at very high image counts where processing speed decides the schedulenot Openspace
- A survey firm combining terrestrial laser scans with drone photography and needing both aligned in a single reconstructionnot Openspace
- A construction reality-capture operator producing meshes for Unreal-based client visualisation from the same source imagerynot Openspace
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Openspace
- Requires specialized 360-degree camera hardware for optimal documentation workflow
- Custom pricing model makes it difficult to evaluate costs upfront without contacting sales
- Field solution is newly launched and may lack mature features compared to established competitors
RealityScan
- The free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- New perpetual licences are no longer sold, so an organisation that deliberately avoided subscription software has no route in; existing perpetual holders keep their version but stop receiving updates unless they accept the current terms
- It is Windows only and needs an NVIDIA CUDA capable GPU, which excludes macOS studios and makes the real cost of adoption a workstation purchase rather than a licence
- The rename from RealityCapture to RealityScan in 2025 means tutorials, forum answers and third party pipeline documentation are split across two names and several licensing regimes, and much of it is now wrong about price
- The interface assumes photogrammetry knowledge; alignment failures, control point placement and reconstruction region setup are not guided, so a team without an experienced operator produces poor models quickly rather than good ones slowly
Pricing, plan by plan
Openspace
$2500/month- Capture$2500/month
- 360 photo capture
- Automatic stitching
- BIM integration
- EnterpriseFree
- All Capture features
- Advanced analytics
- Custom integrations
RealityScan
Free- Free tierFree
- For individuals and companies with annual revenue under 1,000,000 USD
- Full application, no metered input charges
- Epic account required
- RealityScan seat$1250/year
- Required once annual revenue exceeds 1,000,000 USD
- Per seat, per year
- Commercial use without output restrictions
- Unreal Engine subscription$1850/year
- Per seat per year
- Includes RealityScan and Twinmotion
- For teams that also need Unreal Engine for non-game commercial use
Which should you pick?
Choose Openspace if
- You need 360 photo capture.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want bim compare.
Choose RealityScan if
- You need photogrammetric reconstruction.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want laser scan fusion.
Questions people ask
- Is Openspace or RealityScan better?
- Neither clearly leads. Openspace starts at $2500/month and RealityScan at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Openspace or RealityScan?
- RealityScan has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2500/month for Openspace and Free for RealityScan.
- Does Openspace or RealityScan run on more platforms?
- Openspace runs on iOS, Android, Web. RealityScan runs on Windows.
- Can I use RealityScan for free?
- Yes. RealityScan has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Openspace starts at $2500/month.
- What is Openspace best used for?
- Openspace is most often used for site documentation, progress tracking, quality control, dispute resolution. Of those, site documentation and progress tracking are not what RealityScan is typically brought in for.
- What can Openspace do that RealityScan cannot?
- Openspace covers 360 photo capture, BIM compare, Progress tracking, AI analysis. RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction, Laser scan fusion, Ground control points, Texturing and unwrapping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Openspace: How quickly does OpenSpace document construction sites?
OpenSpace documents 25,000 sq. ft. in 10 minutes using 360-degree cameras. Photos are automatically pinned to floor plans, timestamped, and ready to view in 15 minutes.
SourceRealityScan: Is RealityCapture still called that?
No. Epic rebranded it to RealityScan with version 2.0 in 2025. It is the same engine and the same team.
Openspace: Does OpenSpace integrate with existing project management tools?
Yes. OpenSpace Field integrates with Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud, allowing teams to create punch lists and observations in real-time without disrupting existing workflows.
SourceRealityScan: Who gets it free?
Individuals and companies with annual revenue under one million US dollars. Above that, a seat is 1,250 US dollars per year.
Openspace: What camera equipment does OpenSpace require?
OpenSpace uses 360-degree cameras for site documentation. The platform automatically processes and maps captured images without requiring specialized technical skills from on-site staff.
SourceRealityScan: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Not for new purchases. Existing perpetual licences remain valid for the version owned, with updates only under the current terms.
Openspace: What AI features does OpenSpace provide for construction teams?
OpenSpace includes Spatial AI for automatic issue location tagging, AI Voice Notes for hands-free data capture, and an AI-powered media library for efficient image retrieval to accelerate project workflows.
SourceRealityScan: Does the free version restrict output?
No output metering or watermarking; the restriction is on who qualifies, based on company revenue, not on what you export.
Related pages
More on RealityScan
Other head to heads
- Openspace vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Openspace vs Buildots
- Openspace vs Bluebeam Revu
- Openspace vs Reconstruct
- Openspace vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Openspace vs Trimble
- Openspace vs InEight
- Openspace vs Handoff
- Openspace vs Togal.AI
- Openspace vs Trunk Tools
- Openspace vs eSUB
- Openspace vs HCSS
- Openspace vs Microsoft Project
- Openspace vs Egnyte
- Openspace vs Fieldwire
- Openspace vs Primavera P6
- Openspace vs Autodesk Revit
- Openspace vs BuildingConnected
- Openspace vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Openspace vs CloudCompare
- Openspace vs Carlson Software
- Openspace vs Nomad Sculpt
- Openspace vs ANSYS Fluent
- Openspace vs KiCad
- Openspace vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Openspace vs Zoo
- Openspace vs Bentley MicroStation
- Openspace vs Houdini
- Openspace vs D5 Render
- Openspace vs LightWave 3D
- Openspace vs ZBrush
- Openspace vs Arnold
- Openspace vs Inventor
- Openspace vs Mudbox
- RealityScan vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- RealityScan vs Buildots
- RealityScan vs Bluebeam Revu
- RealityScan vs Reconstruct
- RealityScan vs Skydio Dock for X10
- RealityScan vs Trimble
- RealityScan vs InEight
- RealityScan vs Handoff
- RealityScan vs Togal.AI
- RealityScan vs Trunk Tools
- RealityScan vs eSUB
- RealityScan vs HCSS
- RealityScan vs Microsoft Project
- RealityScan vs Egnyte
- RealityScan vs Fieldwire
- RealityScan vs Primavera P6
- RealityScan vs Autodesk Revit
- RealityScan vs BuildingConnected
- RealityScan vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- RealityScan vs CloudCompare
- RealityScan vs Carlson Software
- RealityScan vs Nomad Sculpt
- RealityScan vs ANSYS Fluent
- RealityScan vs KiCad
- RealityScan vs MicroSurvey CAD
- RealityScan vs Zoo
- RealityScan vs Bentley MicroStation
- RealityScan vs Houdini
- RealityScan vs D5 Render
- RealityScan vs LightWave 3D
- RealityScan vs ZBrush
- RealityScan vs Arnold
- RealityScan vs Inventor
- RealityScan vs Mudbox
