Cloud · head to head
OpenEBS vs Portworx Backup

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenEBS there is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.; Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- They diverge on capability: OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenEBS and Portworx Backup actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenEBS | Portworx Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per node hour |
| Platforms | Linux | Web, Linux |
| Category | Cloud | Backup |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenEBS
- Replicated engine
- Local PV engines
- Kubernetes-native management
- Snapshots and clones
- No licence fee
- Hardware independence
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Cross-cluster restore
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
- Free tier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenEBS
- Running Cassandra or Kafka on Kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficientnot Portworx Backup
- A platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal Kubernetes without a per node subscriptionnot Portworx Backup
- An edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justifiednot Portworx Backup
- Replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a Container Storage Interface drivernot Portworx Backup
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot OpenEBS
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot OpenEBS
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot OpenEBS
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot OpenEBS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenEBS
- There is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- The project has several storage engines with different maturity and different operational characteristics, and choosing the wrong one for your workload produces poor results that look like a product failure.
- Documentation and upgrade guidance assume real Kubernetes storage knowledge, so teams without that expertise underestimate the operational load they are taking on.
- Project governance shifted after DataCore acquired MayaData in 2021, which means the direction of a supposedly neutral project is influenced by one commercial sponsor.
- Disaster recovery, cross-cluster replication and policy-driven data services are thinner than in the commercial alternatives, so organisations with those requirements end up building them or buying a product anyway.
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenEBS
Free- OpenEBSFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All storage engines included
- No node or capacity limits
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenEBS if
- You need replicated engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want local pv engines.
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenEBS or Portworx Backup better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenEBS starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenEBS or Portworx Backup?
- OpenEBS starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free.
- Does OpenEBS or Portworx Backup run on more platforms?
- OpenEBS runs on Linux. Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use OpenEBS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenEBS best used for?
- OpenEBS is most often used for running cassandra or kafka on kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficient, a platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal kubernetes without a per node subscription, an edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justified, replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a container storage interface driver. Of those, running cassandra or kafka on kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficient and a platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal kubernetes without a per node subscription are not what Portworx Backup is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenEBS do that Portworx Backup cannot?
- OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Local PV engines, Kubernetes-native management, Snapshots and clones. Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Cross-cluster restore, Namespace and label selection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenEBS: Who supports it in production?
The project is community supported. Commercial support is available from DataCore, which acquired the original sponsor MayaData in 2021. Establish that relationship before production, not during an incident.
Portworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
OpenEBS: Which engine should we use?
If your application replicates its own data, use a Local engine and avoid replicating twice. If it does not, such as with PostgreSQL, use the Replicated engine.
Portworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
OpenEBS: Does it cost anything?
No licence fee. The cost is operational, and a support contract if you want someone accountable.
Portworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Related pages
More on Portworx Backup
Other head to heads
- OpenEBS vs Portworx
- OpenEBS vs Rancher
- OpenEBS vs Longhorn
- OpenEBS vs DigitalOcean
- OpenEBS vs Podman
- OpenEBS vs Qovery
- OpenEBS vs Caddy
- OpenEBS vs Cerebrium
- OpenEBS vs DeepInfra
- OpenEBS vs Go
- OpenEBS vs Proxmox VE
- OpenEBS vs K3s
- OpenEBS vs Rook
- OpenEBS vs containerd
- OpenEBS vs minikube
- OpenEBS vs Cilium
- OpenEBS vs Flux
- OpenEBS vs Linkerd
- OpenEBS vs Velero
- OpenEBS vs Trilio
- OpenEBS vs HYCU
- OpenEBS vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- OpenEBS vs BDRShield
- OpenEBS vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- OpenEBS vs CloudCasa
- OpenEBS vs Kopia
- OpenEBS vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- OpenEBS vs Redstor
- OpenEBS vs rustic
- OpenEBS vs Proxmox Backup Server
- OpenEBS vs Datto Backup
- OpenEBS vs HPE StoreOnce
- OpenEBS vs MSP360 Backup
- OpenEBS vs N-able Backup
- OpenEBS vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Portworx
- Portworx Backup vs Rancher
- Portworx Backup vs Longhorn
- Portworx Backup vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx Backup vs Podman
- Portworx Backup vs Qovery
- Portworx Backup vs Caddy
- Portworx Backup vs Cerebrium
- Portworx Backup vs DeepInfra
- Portworx Backup vs Go
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox VE
- Portworx Backup vs K3s
- Portworx Backup vs Rook
- Portworx Backup vs containerd
- Portworx Backup vs minikube
- Portworx Backup vs Cilium
- Portworx Backup vs Flux
- Portworx Backup vs Linkerd
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx Backup vs CloudCasa
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup

