Backup · head to head
Portworx Backup vs Qovery

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Portworx Backup has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- They diverge on capability: Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Qovery covers Bring your own cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Portworx Backup and Qovery actually diverge.
| Attribute | Portworx Backup | Qovery |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per node hour | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes |
| Category | Backup | Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Cross-cluster restore
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
- Free tier
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot Qovery
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot Qovery
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot Qovery
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot Portworx Backup
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot Portworx Backup
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot Portworx Backup
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot Portworx Backup
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is Portworx Backup or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Portworx Backup starts at Free and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Portworx Backup or Qovery?
- Portworx Backup has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Portworx Backup and On request for Qovery.
- Does Portworx Backup or Qovery run on more platforms?
- Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Portworx Backup for free?
- Yes. Portworx Backup has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Portworx Backup best used for?
- Portworx Backup is most often used for a platform team running velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failures, protecting kubernetes applications across eks, gke and on premises clusters under one policy set, restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery test, a small team that wants real kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budget. Of those, a platform team running velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failures and protecting kubernetes applications across eks, gke and on premises clusters under one policy set are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can Portworx Backup do that Qovery cannot?
- Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Cross-cluster restore, Namespace and label selection. Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Portworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
Qovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
Portworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
Qovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
Portworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Qovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Qovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
More on Portworx Backup
Other head to heads
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx Backup vs CloudCasa
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Render
- Portworx Backup vs Porter
- Portworx Backup vs Northflank
- Portworx Backup vs CapRover
- Portworx Backup vs Coolify
- Portworx Backup vs Railway
- Portworx Backup vs Dokku
- Portworx Backup vs Scaleway
- Portworx Backup vs Portworx
- Portworx Backup vs Podman
- Portworx Backup vs containerd
- Portworx Backup vs Encore
- Portworx Backup vs Oracle Cloud
- Portworx Backup vs Orca Security
- Portworx Backup vs Packer
- Portworx Backup vs OpenTelemetry
- Portworx Backup vs Rook
- Qovery vs Velero
- Qovery vs Trilio
- Qovery vs HYCU
- Qovery vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Qovery vs BDRShield
- Qovery vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Qovery vs CloudCasa
- Qovery vs Kopia
- Qovery vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Qovery vs Redstor
- Qovery vs rustic
- Qovery vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Qovery vs Datto Backup
- Qovery vs HPE StoreOnce
- Qovery vs MSP360 Backup
- Qovery vs N-able Backup
- Qovery vs OwnBackup
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook
