Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Portworx Backup

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Portworx Backup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cilium | Portworx Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per node hour |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, Linux | Web, Linux |
| Category | Cloud | Backup |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Cross-cluster restore
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
- Free tier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Portworx Backup
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Portworx Backup
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Portworx Backup
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot Cilium
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot Cilium
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot Cilium
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Portworx Backup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Portworx Backup?
- Cilium starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free.
- Does Cilium or Portworx Backup run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Portworx Backup is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Portworx Backup cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Cross-cluster restore, Namespace and label selection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Portworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
Cilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Portworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
Cilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Portworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Related pages
More on Portworx Backup
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs Velero
- Cilium vs Trilio
- Cilium vs HYCU
- Cilium vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Cilium vs BDRShield
- Cilium vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Cilium vs CloudCasa
- Cilium vs Kopia
- Cilium vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Cilium vs Redstor
- Cilium vs rustic
- Cilium vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Cilium vs Datto Backup
- Cilium vs HPE StoreOnce
- Cilium vs MSP360 Backup
- Cilium vs N-able Backup
- Cilium vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Podman
- Portworx Backup vs K3s
- Portworx Backup vs Akamai
- Portworx Backup vs Crossplane
- Portworx Backup vs OpenEBS
- Portworx Backup vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx Backup vs Portworx
- Portworx Backup vs Vault
- Portworx Backup vs Fastly
- Portworx Backup vs HAProxy
- Portworx Backup vs Hetzner Cloud
- Portworx Backup vs Infracost
- Portworx Backup vs Lambda
- Portworx Backup vs Linode
- Portworx Backup vs Northflank
- Portworx Backup vs Oracle Cloud
- Portworx Backup vs Buildah
- Portworx Backup vs Rancher
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx Backup vs CloudCasa
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup
