Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

OneTrust vs OWASP ZAP

OneTrust logo

OneTrust

Cybersecurity

Enterprise AI governance and data compliance platform.

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
OWASP ZAP logo

OWASP ZAP

Cybersecurity

Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: OneTrust complex usage-based pricing model with multiple meters (admin users, inventory size, daily visitors, data subjects) making total cost unpredictable; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which OneTrust and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.

Attributes where OneTrust and OWASP ZAP differ
AttributeOneTrustOWASP ZAP
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelusage-basedfree
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, API, CloudDesktop, Cli, Api
FoundedUnknown2001

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in OneTrust

Nothing recorded that OWASP ZAP does not also cover.

Only in OWASP ZAP

  • Intercepting proxy
  • Passive scanner
  • Active scanner
  • AJAX spider
  • Automation Framework
  • Headless daemon and REST API
  • Docker images
  • Add-on marketplace

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

OneTrust

  • Fortune 500 enterprises managing multi-framework compliance (GDPR, SOC 2, EU AI Act, DORA, NIS2)not OWASP ZAP
  • Organisations implementing responsible AI governance and monitoring AI systemsnot OWASP ZAP
  • Companies with global data operations requiring consent and privacy automation at scalenot OWASP ZAP
  • Enterprises managing complex vendor ecosystems with third-party risk assessmentnot OWASP ZAP
  • Regulated industries (finance, healthcare, insurance) requiring continuous compliancenot OWASP ZAP

OWASP ZAP

  • Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot OneTrust
  • Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot OneTrust
  • Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot OneTrust
  • Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot OneTrust

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

OneTrust

  • Complex usage-based pricing model with multiple meters (admin users, inventory size, daily visitors, data subjects) making total cost unpredictable
  • No published pricing examples or per-unit costs; all pricing requires custom quotes
  • Each solution area uses different pricing metrics, requiring complex calculations for multi-solution purchases
  • Enterprise-only positioning (Fortune 500 focus) suggests premium pricing, discouraging mid-market or startup adoption
  • Platform complexity and multiple solution areas may result in significant implementation and ongoing costs not disclosed upfront

OWASP ZAP

  • Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
  • There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
  • Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
  • Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
  • As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.

Pricing, plan by plan

OneTrust

On request
  • AI Governance$undefined/variable
    • Pricing by admin users and AI inventory size
    • AI compliance lifecycle management
    • Control enforcement and monitoring
  • Consent & Preferences$undefined/variable
    • CMP Base: priced by average daily visitors
    • CMP Suite: expanded privacy experiences
    • Universal Consent: metered by data subject profiles
  • Privacy Automation$undefined/variable
    • Priced by users and privacy asset inventory
    • Internal operations automation
    • Data subject request handling
  • Tech Risk & Compliance$undefined/variable
    • Governance and risk management across 50+ standards
    • Priced by admin users and asset inventory

OWASP ZAP

Free
  • Free & Open SourceFree
    • Full functionality
    • Active & passive scanning
    • Spider

Which should you pick?

Choose OneTrust if

  • You work on Web, API, Cloud.
OneTrust review

Choose OWASP ZAP if

  • You need intercepting proxy.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
  • You also want passive scanner.
OWASP ZAP review

Questions people ask

Is OneTrust or OWASP ZAP better?
Neither clearly leads. OneTrust starts at On request and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, OneTrust or OWASP ZAP?
OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for OneTrust and Free for OWASP ZAP.
Does OneTrust or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
OneTrust runs on Web, API, Cloud. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OneTrust starts at On request.
What is OneTrust best used for?
OneTrust is most often used for fortune 500 enterprises managing multi-framework compliance (gdpr, soc 2, eu ai act, dora, nis2), organisations implementing responsible ai governance and monitoring ai systems, companies with global data operations requiring consent and privacy automation at scale, enterprises managing complex vendor ecosystems with third-party risk assessment. Of those, fortune 500 enterprises managing multi-framework compliance (gdpr, soc 2, eu ai act, dora, nis2) and organisations implementing responsible ai governance and monitoring ai systems are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
What can OneTrust do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

OneTrust: How many case studies does OneTrust have?

OneTrust showcases 74+ customer case studies across multiple industries and regions, with examples from banking, insurance, hospitality and technology.

Source
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?

The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.

OneTrust: What compliance standards does OneTrust support?

OneTrust covers tech risk and compliance across 50+ standards including GDPR, SOC 2, EU AI Act, DORA and NIS2.

Source
OWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?

Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.

OneTrust: Does OneTrust automate data detection?

Yes. OneTrust automatically detects and classifies sensitive data across 200+ connectors, identifying where data lives and what regulatory requirements apply.

Source
OWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?

No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.

OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?

Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.

OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?

Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.

Share

Related pages

More on OneTrust

More on OWASP ZAP

Keep looking

Other head to heads