Healthcare · head to head
Nookal vs Paige

Nookal
Healthcare
Australian allied health practice management priced per practitioner with usage charges on top
- From
- 49/month
- Rated
- -

Paige
Healthcare
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nookal the features most multi-practitioner clinics need, including advanced reporting, custom forms and automated recalls, are held back to the Professional tier, so the AUD 49 entry price is not a realistic budget for anything beyond a solo practice.; Paige the FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- They diverge on capability: Nookal covers Per practitioner pricing, Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nookal and Paige actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nookal
- Per practitioner pricing
- Clinical notes
- Online booking
- Automated recalls
- KPI dashboards
- Claiming
- Patient portal
- AI and voice
Only in Paige
- Paige Prostate Detect
- Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify
- Perineural invasion detection
- Breast and lymph node applications
- FullFocus viewer
- Foundation models
- OmniScreen
- Paige Alba
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nookal
- A three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in Australia that wants Medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote processnot Paige
- A New Zealand practice that needs ACC claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billingnot Paige
- A chiropractic group opening a second location that wants shared patient records and one reporting view across sitesnot Paige
- A UK or Irish allied health clinic that wants an Australian-style clinical workflow with GBP or EUR billingnot Paige
Paige
- A reference laboratory processing high volumes of prostate core needle biopsies where a second read on every case is not staffablenot Nookal
- A pathology department already digitised that wants a documented safety net against missed small foci of cancernot Nookal
- A hospital laboratory struggling to recruit uropathology subspecialists and needing consistency across generalist reportingnot Nookal
- A pharmaceutical company needing consistent biomarker scoring across trial sites rather than site-by-site pathologist variabilitynot Nookal
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nookal
- The features most multi-practitioner clinics need, including advanced reporting, custom forms and automated recalls, are held back to the Professional tier, so the AUD 49 entry price is not a realistic budget for anything beyond a solo practice.
- Add-ons stack quickly: AI and voice at about USD 25 per active licence, the patient portal from USD 10 per location and secure messaging from USD 1.50 per user can push a seat close to double its list price.
- Pricing is not a simple currency conversion, with the USD Essentials tier at 65 and Professional at 89 against AUD 49 and 59, so overseas clinics pay a meaningful premium for the same software.
- Messaging and claiming are metered per SMS and per claim, so a clinic that leans on reminders to control no-shows finds a variable line item that grows with appointment volume and is easy to underestimate at purchase.
- Single sign-on is quoted rather than listed and sits with the Enterprise tier, which puts basic identity governance out of reach for mid-sized groups that would otherwise stay on Professional.
Paige
- The FDA authorisation is confined to prostate core needle biopsies, on compatible scanners, viewed through FullFocus, as an adjunct only; every other tissue type and every grading claim is outside that authorisation in the United States.
- The algorithm is worthless without a digital pathology programme already running, and slide scanning, storage and workflow typically cost far more than the software licence.
- Tempus acquired Paige in 2025, so the roadmap now competes for attention inside a genomics-led business, and the pathology-only buyer is no longer the primary customer.
- Scanner compatibility is a hard constraint rather than a preference, and a laboratory with an unsupported scanner fleet cannot use the authorised indication at all.
- Pricing is per case or per slide and unpublished, so a laboratory cannot model cost per reported case without entering a sales process.
Pricing, plan by plan
Nookal
49/month- Essentials$49/month
- Per practitioner per month
- Appointments, patient records and invoicing
- Online booking
- Professional$59/month
- Per practitioner per month
- Advanced reporting and KPI dashboards
- Custom forms
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted pricing
- Multi-account management
- Dedicated support
Paige
On request- Paige clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case or per slide analysed under annual agreement
- Prostate, breast and other applications licensed separately
- Requires compatible whole slide scanner and the FullFocus viewer for the authorised indication
Which should you pick?
Choose Nookal if
- You need per practitioner pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want clinical notes.
Choose Paige if
- You need paige prostate detect.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want paige prostate grade and quantify.
Questions people ask
- Is Nookal or Paige better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nookal starts at 49/month and Paige at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nookal or Paige?
- Nookal starts at 49/month and Paige at On request.
- Does Nookal or Paige run on more platforms?
- Nookal runs on Web, iOS, Android. Paige runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- What is Nookal best used for?
- Nookal is most often used for a three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in australia that wants medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote process, a new zealand practice that needs acc claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billing, a chiropractic group opening a second location that wants shared patient records and one reporting view across sites, a uk or irish allied health clinic that wants an australian-style clinical workflow with gbp or eur billing. Of those, a three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in australia that wants medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote process and a new zealand practice that needs acc claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billing are not what Paige is typically brought in for.
- What can Nookal do that Paige cannot?
- Nookal covers Per practitioner pricing, Clinical notes, Online booking, Automated recalls. Paige covers Paige Prostate Detect, Paige Prostate Grade and Quantify, Perineural invasion detection, Breast and lymph node applications.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nookal: How much does Nookal cost per practitioner?
Essentials is AUD 49 per practitioner per month and Professional is AUD 59, with published equivalents of GBP 29 and 39, EUR 65 and 89, and USD 65 and 89. Enterprise is quoted.
Paige: What exactly is FDA authorised?
Paige Prostate Detect, as an adjunct for identifying areas of interest on digitised prostate core needle biopsy slides, viewed through the Paige FullFocus viewer on a compatible scanner. Nothing else in the portfolio holds that authorisation in the United States.
Nookal: What is not included in the subscription?
SMS from about 7 cents per message, Medicare claims from about 10 cents, ACC claims at about 12 cents, the patient portal, secure messaging, AI and voice, and single sign-on are all charged separately.
Paige: Is the European position broader?
Yes. The Paige Prostate suite including grading and quantification received IVDR certification in 2025, which covers more than the United States authorisation.
Nookal: Is there a contract?
No lock-in contract, and the free trial does not require a credit card.
Paige: What did the pivotal study measure?
Pathologist cancer detection on individual slide images improved, with reported reductions in false negative and false positive readings. It measured pathologist performance with the tool, not standalone algorithm accuracy.
Nookal: Which countries does the claiming work in?
Medicare claiming is Australian and ACC claiming is New Zealand. Elsewhere the software works but you invoice and reconcile manually.
Paige: Who owns Paige now?
Tempus AI acquired Paige in 2025. Products remain branded Paige.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nookal vs Jane App
- Nookal vs SimplePractice
- Nookal vs Cliniko
- Nookal vs Zanda Health
- Nookal vs Halaxy
- Nookal vs ChiroTouch
- Nookal vs TheraNest
- Nookal vs Dentrix
- Nookal vs Doctolib
- Nookal vs Open Dental
- Nookal vs Athenahealth
- Nookal vs DrChrono
- Nookal vs Medscape
- Nookal vs Meru Health
- Nookal vs NextGen Healthcare
- Nookal vs Oracle Clinical One
- Nookal vs Phreesia
- Nookal vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Nookal vs Sectra
- Nookal vs PathAI
- Nookal vs Techcyte
- Nookal vs Lunit
- Nookal vs Gleamer
- Nookal vs Annalise.ai
- Nookal vs Therapixel
- Nookal vs Aidoc
- Nookal vs Koa Health
- Nookal vs Ambra Health
- Nookal vs DHIS2
- Nookal vs Kareo
- Nookal vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Nookal vs Omada Health
- Nookal vs OpenClinica
- Nookal vs Kareo Clinical
- Paige vs Jane App
- Paige vs SimplePractice
- Paige vs Cliniko
- Paige vs Zanda Health
- Paige vs Halaxy
- Paige vs ChiroTouch
- Paige vs TheraNest
- Paige vs Dentrix
- Paige vs Doctolib
- Paige vs Open Dental
- Paige vs Athenahealth
- Paige vs DrChrono
- Paige vs Medscape
- Paige vs Meru Health
- Paige vs NextGen Healthcare
- Paige vs Oracle Clinical One
- Paige vs Phreesia
- Paige vs Ibex Medical Analytics
- Paige vs Sectra
- Paige vs PathAI
- Paige vs Techcyte
- Paige vs Lunit
- Paige vs Gleamer
- Paige vs Annalise.ai
- Paige vs Therapixel
- Paige vs Aidoc
- Paige vs Koa Health
- Paige vs Ambra Health
- Paige vs DHIS2
- Paige vs Kareo
- Paige vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Paige vs Omada Health
- Paige vs OpenClinica
- Paige vs Kareo Clinical
