Cybersecurity · head to head
NICE Actimize vs Trivy

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trivy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NICE Actimize and Trivy actually diverge.
| Attribute | NICE Actimize | Trivy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Trivy
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Trivy
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Trivy
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot NICE Actimize
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot NICE Actimize
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot NICE Actimize
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is NICE Actimize or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. NICE Actimize starts at On request and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NICE Actimize or Trivy?
- Trivy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NICE Actimize and Free for Trivy.
- Does NICE Actimize or Trivy run on more platforms?
- NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Trivy for free?
- Yes. Trivy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NICE Actimize starts at On request.
- What is NICE Actimize best used for?
- NICE Actimize is most often used for a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise, a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications, a regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governance, a payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch aml monitoring. Of those, a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise and a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can NICE Actimize do that Trivy cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
Trivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
NICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
Trivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
NICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Trivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs Grype
- NICE Actimize vs Snyk
- NICE Actimize vs Chainguard
- NICE Actimize vs Semgrep
- NICE Actimize vs Bitwarden
- NICE Actimize vs Infisical
- NICE Actimize vs Authelia
- NICE Actimize vs Ory Kratos
- NICE Actimize vs HashiCorp Vault
- NICE Actimize vs Arnica
- NICE Actimize vs OWASP ZAP
- NICE Actimize vs Proton Mail
- NICE Actimize vs Veriff
- NICE Actimize vs Brave Browser
- NICE Actimize vs March Networks
- NICE Actimize vs Salient CompleteView
- NICE Actimize vs Syft
- Trivy vs Silent Eight
- Trivy vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Trivy vs Quantexa
- Trivy vs Feedzai
- Trivy vs Unit21
- Trivy vs Fenergo
- Trivy vs Sardine
- Trivy vs ThetaRay
- Trivy vs Transmit Security
- Trivy vs Socure
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Jumio
- Trivy vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Trivy vs Recorded Future
- Trivy vs RoboForm
- Trivy vs Semperis
- Trivy vs SentinelOne
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Syft
