Cloud · head to head
Neon vs Zilliz

Zilliz
Databases
Managed vector database and vector lakebase for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives; Zilliz pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
- They diverge on capability: Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Zilliz covers Vector indexing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neon and Zilliz actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Only in Zilliz
- Vector indexing
- Distributed architecture
- SQL interface
- Tensor support
- Real-time search
- Cloud-native
- Open-source compatible
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot Zilliz
- Development databasesnot Zilliz
- Preview environmentsnot Zilliz
- Testingnot Zilliz
Zilliz
- Build retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systemsnot Neon
- Implement semantic search over documentsnot Neon
- Create multimodal search with text and imagesnot Neon
- Power recommendation engines with vector similaritynot Neon
- Enable similarity search on user embeddingsnot Neon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
Zilliz
- Pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
- Operational complexity for self-hosted Milvus deployments
- Learning curve for those unfamiliar with vector databases
- Limited built-in analytics compared to some alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
Zilliz
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Zilliz review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Choose Zilliz if
- You need vector indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want distributed architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Neon or Zilliz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neon starts at Free and Zilliz at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neon or Zilliz?
- Neon starts at Free and Zilliz at Free.
- Does Neon or Zilliz run on more platforms?
- Neon runs on Cloud. Zilliz runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Neon for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neon best used for?
- Neon is most often used for serverless applications, development databases, preview environments, testing. Of those, serverless applications and development databases are not what Zilliz is typically brought in for.
- What can Neon do that Zilliz cannot?
- Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. Zilliz covers Vector indexing, Distributed architecture, SQL interface, Tensor support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceZilliz: What is the difference between Milvus and Zilliz Cloud?
Milvus is the open-source vector database that you can self-host. Zilliz Cloud is the fully managed service built on Milvus that removes operational overhead and handles scaling automatically.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceZilliz: How many vectors can Zilliz handle?
Milvus and Zilliz Cloud can store and search billions of vectors through their distributed architecture that separates storage and compute layers.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceZilliz: Is Milvus open-source?
Yes, Milvus is open-source under the Apache License 2.0 and is part of the LF AI & Data Foundation.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceZilliz: What pricing does Zilliz Cloud offer?
Zilliz Cloud pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting their team to discuss your specific scale and use case requirements.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Oracle Cloud
- Neon vs Fly.io
- Neon vs Railway
- Neon vs Scaleway
- Neon vs Proxmox VE
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Tencent Cloud
- Neon vs Lambda
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Longhorn
- Neon vs Northflank
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs minikube
- Neon vs OpenTelemetry
- Neon vs Qdrant
- Neon vs Vespa
- Neon vs Marqo
- Neon vs DataStax
- Neon vs Elasticsearch
- Neon vs Meilisearch
- Neon vs Typesense
- Neon vs Materialize
- Neon vs OpenSearch
- Neon vs Apache Solr
- Neon vs Readyset
- Neon vs SurrealDB
- Neon vs StarRocks
- Neon vs Teradata
- Neon vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Neon vs Timeplus
- Neon vs turbopuffer
- Zilliz vs Upstash
- Zilliz vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zilliz vs DigitalOcean
- Zilliz vs Render
- Zilliz vs Oracle Cloud
- Zilliz vs Fly.io
- Zilliz vs Railway
- Zilliz vs Scaleway
- Zilliz vs Proxmox VE
- Zilliz vs Vultr
- Zilliz vs Tencent Cloud
- Zilliz vs Lambda
- Zilliz vs Linode
- Zilliz vs Longhorn
- Zilliz vs Northflank
- Zilliz vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zilliz vs minikube
- Zilliz vs OpenTelemetry
- Zilliz vs Qdrant
- Zilliz vs Vespa
- Zilliz vs Marqo
- Zilliz vs DataStax
- Zilliz vs Elasticsearch
- Zilliz vs Meilisearch
- Zilliz vs Typesense
- Zilliz vs Materialize
- Zilliz vs OpenSearch
- Zilliz vs Apache Solr
- Zilliz vs Readyset
- Zilliz vs SurrealDB
- Zilliz vs StarRocks
- Zilliz vs Teradata
- Zilliz vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Zilliz vs Timeplus
- Zilliz vs turbopuffer

