Software · head to head
Neon vs PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Software
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neon and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Neon | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Cloud | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Founded | 2021 | 1996 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
Both cover
- Prisma
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot PostgreSQL
- Development databasesnot PostgreSQL
- Preview environmentsnot PostgreSQL
- Testingnot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot Neon
- Data storagenot Neon
- Application backendnot Neon
- Reportingnot Neon
- Data analyticsnot Neon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is Neon or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neon starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neon or PostgreSQL?
- Neon starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free.
- Does Neon or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- Neon runs on Cloud. PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use Neon for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neon best used for?
- Neon is most often used for serverless applications, development databases, preview environments, testing. Of those, serverless applications and development databases are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Neon do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility. Both handle Prisma.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourcePostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourcePostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourcePostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourcePostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourcePostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Neon vs Grafana Cloud
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs Deno Deploy
- Neon vs Heroku
- Neon vs Hetzner Cloud
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Packer
- Neon vs Pulumi
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs Vagrant
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Akamai
- Neon vs Alibaba Cloud
- Neon vs Chef
- Neon vs Contabo
- Neon vs Cockroach Labs
- Neon vs Airtable
- Neon vs Amazon Aurora
- Neon vs Elasticsearch
- Neon vs PlanetScale
- Neon vs Azure SQL
- Neon vs ClickHouse
- Neon vs Couchbase
- Neon vs DuckDB
- Neon vs DynamoDB
- Neon vs MariaDB
- Neon vs Oracle Database
- Neon vs Amazon RDS
- Neon vs Amazon Redshift
- Neon vs Apache Druid
- Neon vs Cassandra
- Neon vs CouchDB
- Neon vs Firebolt
- PostgreSQL vs Grafana Cloud
- PostgreSQL vs DigitalOcean
- PostgreSQL vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- PostgreSQL vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- PostgreSQL vs Deno Deploy
- PostgreSQL vs Heroku
- PostgreSQL vs Hetzner Cloud
- PostgreSQL vs Linode
- PostgreSQL vs Packer
- PostgreSQL vs Pulumi
- PostgreSQL vs Render
- PostgreSQL vs Upstash
- PostgreSQL vs Vagrant
- PostgreSQL vs Vultr
- PostgreSQL vs Akamai
- PostgreSQL vs Alibaba Cloud
- PostgreSQL vs Chef
- PostgreSQL vs Contabo
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs Airtable
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Aurora
- PostgreSQL vs Elasticsearch
- PostgreSQL vs PlanetScale
- PostgreSQL vs Azure SQL
- PostgreSQL vs ClickHouse
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs DynamoDB
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon RDS
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Druid
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firebolt

