Databases · head to head
QuestDB vs Turso

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Turso
Databases
SQLite-lineage database platform for running very large numbers of small per-tenant databases, with an MIT-licensed engine.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features; Turso sQLite allows one writer per database, so a single tenant's write throughput cannot be scaled horizontally and a busy tenant serialises against itself with no sharding option.
- They diverge on capability: QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, Turso covers Per-tenant databases.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which QuestDB and Turso actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Only in Turso
- Per-tenant databases
- MIT licence
- Embedded replicas
- SQLite compatibility
- HTTP access
- Branching
- Point-in-time restore
- In-process engine
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Turso
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Turso
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Turso
Turso
- Multi-tenant SaaS where each customer gets their own database for real isolation, per-tenant restore and clean deletionnot QuestDB
- Agent or session infrastructure that creates a throwaway database per task and destroys it afterwardsnot QuestDB
- Local-first and offline-capable applications where an embedded replica serves reads at file speed and syncs when connectivity returnsnot QuestDB
- Embedding a SQLite-compatible engine in a product where the public domain original's closed contribution model is a problemnot QuestDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Turso
- SQLite allows one writer per database, so a single tenant's write throughput cannot be scaled horizontally and a busy tenant serialises against itself with no sharding option.
- Per-tenant databases mean per-tenant migrations, so every schema change becomes a fan-out job that must be idempotent and resumable, and multi-database schemas, the feature meant to solve this, is deprecated.
- There are no cross-database queries; ATTACH is deprecated on the cloud, so any report or analytic spanning tenants must be assembled in your application or in a separate warehouse you also operate.
- Data Edge, the multi-region edge replication that was Turso's original positioning, is deprecated, so a large share of the tutorials and articles describing Turso as an edge database describe behaviour you can no longer rely on.
- Three engine lineages share the name, SQLite, the libSQL fork and the Rust rewrite, and the Rust engine is still maturing, so SQLite compatibility needs verifying against your specific pragmas, extensions and query patterns; the cloud already restricts journal_mode and busy_timeout and makes user_version read-only.
Pricing, plan by plan
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Turso
Free- FreeFree
- 100 databases
- 5 GB storage
- 500M monthly rows read
- Developer$4.99/month
- Unlimited databases
- 9 GB storage
- 2.5B monthly rows read
- Scaler$24.92/month
- Unlimited databases
- 24 GB storage
- 100B monthly rows read
- Pro$416.58/month
- Unlimited databases
- 50 GB storage
- 250B monthly rows read
Which should you pick?
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Choose Turso if
- You need per-tenant databases.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want mit licence.
Questions people ask
- Is QuestDB or Turso better?
- Neither clearly leads. QuestDB starts at Free and Turso at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, QuestDB or Turso?
- QuestDB starts at Free and Turso at Free.
- Does QuestDB or Turso run on more platforms?
- QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP). Turso runs on Web.
- Can I use QuestDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is QuestDB best used for?
- QuestDB is most often used for time-series analytics ingesting up to 20m rows/second from iot sensors or financial data feeds, real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analytics, applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time sql, cold parquet archive). Of those, time-series analytics ingesting up to 20m rows/second from iot sensors or financial data feeds and real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analytics are not what Turso is typically brought in for.
- What can QuestDB do that Turso cannot?
- QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Turso covers Per-tenant databases, MIT licence, Embedded replicas, SQLite compatibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
QuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceTurso: Is Turso just hosted SQLite?
Not exactly. It hosts databases built on the SQLite lineage: libSQL, an MIT fork of SQLite, and Turso Database, a newer Rust rewrite. The platform adds branching, backups, an HTTP API and programmatic database creation.
QuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceTurso: Can I really run a million databases?
That is the design goal and the platform API exists to make provisioning and deletion programmatic. The practical constraints are the ones that come with it: migrations fan out, and nothing can query across databases.
QuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceTurso: How do embedded replicas handle read-after-write?
Reads come from the local replica and writes go to the primary, so a read immediately after a write can return stale data unless you wait for a sync. Application code has to account for that rather than assume it.
Turso: What licence is it under?
libSQL and Turso Database are both MIT. Turso Cloud is a commercial managed service built on them, so the engine is genuinely open even though the platform is not.
Turso: Is Turso still an edge database?
No. Data Edge, the multi-region edge replication feature, is deprecated. The current positioning is per-tenant and embedded databases, and older material describing edge replication is out of date.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs SurrealDB
- QuestDB vs MotherDuck
- QuestDB vs EMQX
- QuestDB vs Nile
- QuestDB vs SQLite
- QuestDB vs Teradata
- QuestDB vs Apache Kafka
- QuestDB vs Instaclustr
- QuestDB vs Knack
- QuestDB vs LanceDB
- QuestDB vs Marqo
- QuestDB vs Ninox
- Turso vs TimescaleDB
- Turso vs PostgreSQL
- Turso vs Cockroach Labs
- Turso vs Amazon Aurora
- Turso vs Airtable
- Turso vs Firebolt
- Turso vs Apache Flink
- Turso vs DuckDB
- Turso vs OpenSearch
- Turso vs ClickHouse
- Turso vs NATS
- Turso vs Canary Labs
- Turso vs Chroma
- Turso vs Cloudinary
- Turso vs Convex
- Turso vs Dgraph
- Turso vs Dragonfly
- Turso vs Apache Druid
- Turso vs SurrealDB
- Turso vs MotherDuck
- Turso vs EMQX
- Turso vs Nile
- Turso vs SQLite
- Turso vs Teradata
- Turso vs Apache Kafka
- Turso vs Instaclustr
- Turso vs Knack
- Turso vs LanceDB
- Turso vs Marqo
- Turso vs Ninox
