Databases · head to head
Canary Labs vs Vitess

Canary Labs
Databases
Industrial process historian with published per-tag pricing and no client licence fees
- From
- $3000/year
- Rated
- -

Vitess
Databases
Scalable database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Vitess has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Canary Labs pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.; Vitess vTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- They diverge on capability: Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Canary Labs and Vitess actually diverge.
| Attribute | Canary Labs | Vitess |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Per tag band per year | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Canary Labs
- Loss-less compression
- Unlimited clients
- Store and forward
- Views service
- Sparkplug B
- Calculation engine
- Axiom
- ODBC and REST
Only in Vitess
- Horizontal Sharding
- Connection Pooling
- Query Routing
- Online Schema Changes
- Shard Management
- Replication Management
- Automated Failover
- MySQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Canary Labs
- A manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a PI System enterprise agreementnot Vitess
- A water utility replacing SCADA-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next SCADA replacementnot Vitess
- An Ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboardsnot Vitess
- A plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an auditnot Vitess
Vitess
- Transaction processingnot Canary Labs
- Data storagenot Canary Labs
- Application backendnot Canary Labs
- Reportingnot Canary Labs
- Data analyticsnot Canary Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Canary Labs
- Pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- CustomerCare at 18 percent of licence cost is effectively mandatory on perpetual licences because lapsing it removes upgrades, so the perpetual option is not really a one-time cost.
- The storage format is proprietary; getting data out at volume means the ODBC connector, an additional 2,500 USD one-time or 1,000 USD a year, or writing against the REST API.
- Canary is a small vendor with a limited partner network outside North America, so support coverage and integrator availability in Europe and Asia are thinner than for AVEVA or Ignition.
- It is a Windows-only server product with no Linux or container deployment, which complicates placing collectors in modern edge estates.
Vitess
- VTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- Foreign key constraints not enforced across shards, requiring application-level integrity handling
- Single primary per keyspace limits multi-region write capabilities
- Distributed transactions without proper sharding key routing suffer performance degradation
Pricing, plan by plan
Canary Labs
$3000/year- Subscription, 3,500 tags$3000/year
- Unlimited Axiom clients
- Unlimited Excel clients
- Support and upgrades included
- Perpetual, 3,500 tags$8730/one-time
- 7,400 USD licence plus 1,330 USD first-year CustomerCare
- CustomerCare renews at 18 percent of licence cost per year
- Unlimited clients
- Private cloud, 3,500 tags$12320/year
- Hosted by Canary
- 1,500 USD one-time setup fee per system
- Scales to around 58,684 USD per year at 60,000 tags
- Enterprise unlimited$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags
- Negotiated licensing terms
- Quoted pricing
Vitess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vitess review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Canary Labs if
- You need loss-less compression.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want unlimited clients.
Choose Vitess if
- You need horizontal sharding.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want connection pooling.
Questions people ask
- Is Canary Labs or Vitess better?
- Neither clearly leads. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year and Vitess at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Canary Labs or Vitess?
- Vitess has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3000/year for Canary Labs and Free for Vitess.
- Does Canary Labs or Vitess run on more platforms?
- Canary Labs runs on Windows, Web. Vitess runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Vitess for free?
- Yes. Vitess has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year.
- What is Canary Labs best used for?
- Canary Labs is most often used for a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement, a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement, an ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboards, a plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an audit. Of those, a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement and a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement are not what Vitess is typically brought in for.
- What can Canary Labs do that Vitess cannot?
- Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Unlimited clients, Store and forward, Views service. Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding, Connection Pooling, Query Routing, Online Schema Changes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Canary Labs: What does Canary cost?
8,730 USD for a 3,500 tag perpetual system including first-year CustomerCare, or 3,000 USD a year on subscription.
Vitess: Is Vitess free to use?
Yes. Vitess is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a graduated CNCF project with no licensing costs or pricing tiers.
SourceCanary Labs: Are client licences extra?
No. Unlimited Axiom browser clients and unlimited Excel clients are included on every tier.
Vitess: What databases does Vitess support?
Vitess supports MySQL and MariaDB as backend databases. It acts as a middleware layer that adds sharding and orchestration capabilities on top of these databases.
SourceCanary Labs: Is perpetual cheaper than subscription?
Canary states perpetual pays off after roughly three years, and after that you still pay 18 percent CustomerCare annually.
Vitess: Does Vitess require Kubernetes to run?
No. Vitess can run on Kubernetes using the Vitess Operator, but it can also be deployed on traditional infrastructure. Kubernetes integration is optional and provides additional automation benefits.
SourceCanary Labs: Does it use lossy compression?
No. Canary stores every collected value rather than approximating the trend, which matters for regulated data retention.
Vitess: How does Vitess handle cross-shard transactions?
Vitess supports distributed transactions across shards, but they require queries to be routed through the sharding key. Transactions without a proper sharding key can result in slower performance.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess enforce foreign key constraints?
Vitess does not enforce foreign key constraints across shards by default. Referential integrity must be managed at the application layer, though per-database support can be enabled with limitations.
SourceRelated pages
More on Canary Labs
Other head to heads
- Canary Labs vs VerneMQ
- Canary Labs vs EMQX
- Canary Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Canary Labs vs QuestDB
- Canary Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Canary Labs vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Canary Labs vs Apache Doris
- Canary Labs vs Convex
- Canary Labs vs Instaclustr
- Canary Labs vs Cockroach Labs
- Canary Labs vs Meilisearch
- Canary Labs vs DuckDB
- Canary Labs vs BigQuery
- Canary Labs vs CosmosDB
- Canary Labs vs DataStax
- Canary Labs vs dbt
- Canary Labs vs FaunaDB
- Canary Labs vs TiDB
- Canary Labs vs Readyset
- Canary Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Canary Labs vs NATS
- Canary Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Canary Labs vs RabbitMQ
- Canary Labs vs ClickHouse
- Canary Labs vs Azure SQL
- Canary Labs vs MariaDB
- Canary Labs vs Oracle Database
- Canary Labs vs IBM Db2
- Canary Labs vs Knack
- Canary Labs vs LanceDB
- Canary Labs vs Marqo
- Canary Labs vs Nile
- Canary Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Vitess vs VerneMQ
- Vitess vs EMQX
- Vitess vs TimescaleDB
- Vitess vs QuestDB
- Vitess vs Solace PubSub+
- Vitess vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Vitess vs Apache Doris
- Vitess vs Convex
- Vitess vs Instaclustr
- Vitess vs Cockroach Labs
- Vitess vs Meilisearch
- Vitess vs DuckDB
- Vitess vs BigQuery
- Vitess vs CosmosDB
- Vitess vs DataStax
- Vitess vs dbt
- Vitess vs FaunaDB
- Vitess vs TiDB
- Vitess vs Readyset
- Vitess vs Amazon Aurora
- Vitess vs NATS
- Vitess vs PostgreSQL
- Vitess vs RabbitMQ
- Vitess vs ClickHouse
- Vitess vs Azure SQL
- Vitess vs MariaDB
- Vitess vs Oracle Database
- Vitess vs IBM Db2
- Vitess vs Knack
- Vitess vs LanceDB
- Vitess vs Marqo
- Vitess vs Nile
- Vitess vs Amazon Redshift
