Communication · head to head
Naver Works vs Shortcut

Naver Works
Communication
Korean and Japanese business messaging with mail, drive and approval workflows in one licence
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Naver Works the integration ecosystem is small by comparison with Slack or Microsoft Teams, so any workflow that depends on a long tail of third-party apps will need custom development against the Works API.; Shortcut limited reporting compared to Jira
- They diverge on capability: Naver Works covers Messaging with LINE reach, Shortcut covers Stories & epics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Naver Works and Shortcut actually diverge.
| Attribute | Naver Works | Shortcut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Category | Communication | Technology |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Naver Works
- Messaging with LINE reach
- Business mail
- Drive
- Electronic approval
- Calendar and board
- Clova Note
- Admin and audit
Only in Shortcut
- Stories & epics
- Iterations (sprints)
- Kanban boards
- Roadmaps
- Reporting
- Docs
- API & webhooks
- Mobile apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Naver Works
- A Japanese retailer whose customer service happens over LINE and needs those conversations inside an auditable corporate systemnot Shortcut
- A Korean company that needs electronic approval workflows in the local style rather than a generic chat tool with a form bolted onnot Shortcut
- The Seoul or Tokyo office of a multinational that needs a local-language collaboration tool alongside head office Microsoft 365not Shortcut
- A small team of under 30 people that wants free business messaging with a real upgrade path rather than a message history capnot Shortcut
Shortcut
- Sprint planningnot Naver Works
- Bug trackingnot Naver Works
- Feature developmentnot Naver Works
- Product roadmappingnot Naver Works
- Team collaborationnot Naver Works
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Naver Works
- The integration ecosystem is small by comparison with Slack or Microsoft Teams, so any workflow that depends on a long tail of third-party apps will need custom development against the Works API.
- Documentation, support and most community knowledge are in Korean and Japanese; an English-speaking administrator will spend a lot of time in machine translation.
- Pricing is published in Korean won and the buying experience assumes a Korean or Japanese business entity, which complicates procurement for a company incorporated elsewhere.
- The Lite tier omits business email, so the plan that looks cheap is messaging only and the realistic entry point for most companies is Standard at more than double the price.
- Clova Note transcription and several AI features are sold as separate line items rather than bundled, so the quoted per-user figure understates what a team using the full suite actually pays.
Shortcut
- Limited reporting compared to Jira
- Designed specifically for software teams, not general project management
- Can experience slow loading times with very large projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Naver Works
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 30 members
- 5GB shared storage
- Limited administration and audit features
- Lite$3000/month
- Unlimited members
- 10GB storage per user
- Messaging, calendar, board and address book
- Standard$7000/month
- 100GB storage per user
- Business email included
- Fuller administration and audit controls
- Standard Plus$11000/month
- 1TB drive per user
- Larger mail quota
- Monthly billing is 13,000 KRW
Shortcut
Free- FreeFree
- Kanban boards
- Sprints
- Roadmaps
- Team$8.5/user/month
- Unlimited users
- Advanced reports
- WIP limits
- Business$12/user/month
- Unlimited workspaces
- OKRs
- Advanced custom fields
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Volume discounts
- SSO/SCIM
- Premier support
Which should you pick?
Choose Naver Works if
- You need messaging with line reach.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS.
- You also want business mail.
Choose Shortcut if
- You need stories & epics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want iterations (sprints).
Questions people ask
- Is Naver Works or Shortcut better?
- Neither clearly leads. Naver Works starts at Free and Shortcut at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Naver Works or Shortcut?
- Naver Works starts at Free and Shortcut at Free.
- Does Naver Works or Shortcut run on more platforms?
- Naver Works runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS. Shortcut runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Naver Works for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Naver Works best used for?
- Naver Works is most often used for a japanese retailer whose customer service happens over line and needs those conversations inside an auditable corporate system, a korean company that needs electronic approval workflows in the local style rather than a generic chat tool with a form bolted on, the seoul or tokyo office of a multinational that needs a local-language collaboration tool alongside head office microsoft 365, a small team of under 30 people that wants free business messaging with a real upgrade path rather than a message history cap. Of those, a japanese retailer whose customer service happens over line and needs those conversations inside an auditable corporate system and a korean company that needs electronic approval workflows in the local style rather than a generic chat tool with a form bolted on are not what Shortcut is typically brought in for.
- What can Naver Works do that Shortcut cannot?
- Naver Works covers Messaging with LINE reach, Business mail, Drive, Electronic approval. Shortcut covers Stories & epics, Iterations (sprints), Kanban boards, Roadmaps.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Naver Works: Can Naver Works really message ordinary LINE users?
Yes. External connection with consumer LINE accounts is the feature that most differentiates it, and it is the main reason it sells in Japan.
Shortcut: Does Shortcut have a free plan?
Yes, Shortcut offers a free plan for up to 10 users with core features like kanban boards, roadmaps, sprints, and reports. Paid plans start at $8.50 per user per month.
SourceNaver Works: Is Naver Works the same as LINE WORKS?
They are the same lineage under Works Mobile, marketed as Naver Works in Korea and LINE WORKS in Japan and other markets. Feature sets and pricing pages differ by region.
Shortcut: Does Shortcut integrate with GitHub?
Yes, Shortcut has native GitHub integration that automatically syncs pull requests and commits to stories, and includes GitLab and Bitbucket support as well.
SourceNaver Works: Is there a genuinely free tier?
Yes, capped at 30 members with 5GB of shared storage and reduced administration features. It does not expire.
Shortcut: Can I use Shortcut for non-technical projects?
Shortcut is built for software teams, though you can customize workflows for other use cases. Linear and Asana may be better suited for non-technical project management.
SourceNaver Works: Does it work for a company outside Korea and Japan?
Technically yes, but you are buying a regional product. Expect Korean or Japanese support, local billing and few connectors to Western SaaS.
Shortcut: Does Shortcut support SSO and SCIM?
Yes, SSO and SCIM support are available on the Enterprise plan, allowing centralized identity management for large organizations.
SourceShortcut: What's the difference between Shortcut and Jira?
Shortcut is lighter and faster with less setup required, while Jira offers deeper customization and enterprise features. Shortcut works better for modern software teams wanting simplicity; Jira suits enterprises needing extensive configuration.
SourceRelated pages
More on Naver Works
Other head to heads
- Naver Works vs Slack
- Naver Works vs Microsoft Teams
- Naver Works vs LINE WORKS
- Naver Works vs Kakao Work
- Naver Works vs Line
- Naver Works vs Webex by Cisco
- Naver Works vs Flock
- Naver Works vs Chatwork
- Naver Works vs Viber
- Naver Works vs Loom
- Naver Works vs KakaoTalk
- Naver Works vs WeChat
- Naver Works vs Textline
- Naver Works vs Twist
- Naver Works vs Vowel
- Naver Works vs WhatsApp
- Naver Works vs Novu
- Naver Works vs Messenger
- Naver Works vs Jira
- Naver Works vs Asana
- Naver Works vs Linear
- Naver Works vs Height
- Naver Works vs Monday.com
- Naver Works vs ClickUp
- Naver Works vs Notion
- Naver Works vs Plane
- Naver Works vs GitHub
- Naver Works vs Lucidchart
- Naver Works vs Figma
- Naver Works vs Coda
- Naver Works vs RescueTime
- Naver Works vs UptimeRobot
- Naver Works vs Vercel
- Naver Works vs Zeta
- Naver Works vs Attio
- Naver Works vs CloudAMQP
- Shortcut vs Slack
- Shortcut vs Microsoft Teams
- Shortcut vs LINE WORKS
- Shortcut vs Kakao Work
- Shortcut vs Line
- Shortcut vs Webex by Cisco
- Shortcut vs Flock
- Shortcut vs Chatwork
- Shortcut vs Viber
- Shortcut vs Loom
- Shortcut vs KakaoTalk
- Shortcut vs WeChat
- Shortcut vs Textline
- Shortcut vs Twist
- Shortcut vs Vowel
- Shortcut vs WhatsApp
- Shortcut vs Novu
- Shortcut vs Messenger
- Shortcut vs Jira
- Shortcut vs Asana
- Shortcut vs Linear
- Shortcut vs Height
- Shortcut vs Monday.com
- Shortcut vs ClickUp
- Shortcut vs Notion
- Shortcut vs Plane
- Shortcut vs GitHub
- Shortcut vs Lucidchart
- Shortcut vs Figma
- Shortcut vs Coda
- Shortcut vs RescueTime
- Shortcut vs UptimeRobot
- Shortcut vs Vercel
- Shortcut vs Zeta
- Shortcut vs Attio
- Shortcut vs CloudAMQP

