Automation Integration · head to head
n8n vs Nango

Nango
Automation Integration
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: n8n starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions; Nango the licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- They diverge on capability: n8n covers Workflow automation, Nango covers Managed OAuth.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which n8n and Nango actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in n8n
- Workflow automation
- Visual editor
- Conditional execution
- Looping
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- REST API
- 400+ integrations
Only in Nango
- Managed OAuth
- Pre-built integrations
- Custom syncs and actions
- Incremental sync
- Rate limit and retry handling
- Self-hosting
- Unified models
Both cover
- Webhooks
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
n8n
- Building AI agents and workflow automation for technical teamsnot Nango
- Visual workflow design with capability to write custom JavaScript or Python codenot Nango
- Enterprise deployments with self-hosted or cloud optionsnot Nango
- Integrating 500+ pre-built applications with custom API connectionsnot Nango
Nango
- A SaaS product that needs to ship twenty customer-facing integrations without hiring a team to maintain OAuth and token refresh for eachnot n8n
- A team that needs a niche or internal API integrated, which closed unified API vendors will not build for themnot n8n
- A company with data residency or security constraints that must self-host the integration layer rather than send customer tokens to a vendornot n8n
- An engineering team replacing a homegrown integration service whose main cost is silent token expiry and rate limit failures in productionnot n8n
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
n8n
- Starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- Starter and Pro tiers restricted to Cloud hosting only, not self-hosted
- Business tier requires 6 months minimum commitment at €667/month
- SSO/SAML/LDAP authentication requires Business or Enterprise tier
- Dedicated support with SLA available only on Enterprise plan
Nango
- The licence is Elastic License 2.0, which is source available rather than OSI open source, and it forbids offering Nango to third parties as a managed service, so anyone planning to resell or embed it in a platform for their own customers has a genuine legal problem.
- Pricing is per connection where a connection is one authorised end-user account, so cost scales linearly with your customer base and a product where each user links several services multiplies quickly beyond what a headline plan price suggests.
- Pre-built integrations vary in depth, and a connection that exists is not the same as a connection that covers the endpoints and objects your feature needs, so each one must be verified before it is designed into a roadmap.
- Custom syncs are written in TypeScript and run in Nango model, which means integration logic lives in a vendor runtime and migrating away later requires rewriting it rather than lifting it out.
- Self-hosting removes the vendor from the data path but transfers operational responsibility for a component that holds customer OAuth tokens, and few teams appreciate the security burden that comes with running that themselves.
Pricing, plan by plan
n8n
Free- CommunityFree
- Free self-hosted version on GitHub
- Open source
- Starter$20/month
- 2,500 workflow executions
- 5 concurrent executions
- 2,300 AI credits/month
- Pro$50/month
- 10,000 workflow executions
- 20 concurrent executions
- 13,700 AI credits/month
- Business$667/month
- 40,000 workflow executions
- Self-hosted option
- 6 shared projects
Nango
Free- FreeFree
- 10 connections
- Pre-built integrations
- Managed OAuth
- Starter$50/month
- 20 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Custom syncs and actions
- Growth$500/month
- 100 connections included
- 1 USD per additional connection
- Higher limits
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted
- Custom connection volumes
- Security review and SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose n8n if
- You need workflow automation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want visual editor.
Choose Nango if
- You need managed oauth.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want pre-built integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is n8n or Nango better?
- Neither clearly leads. n8n starts at Free and Nango at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, n8n or Nango?
- n8n starts at Free and Nango at Free.
- Does n8n or Nango run on more platforms?
- n8n runs on Web, Docker, Self-hosted. Nango runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use n8n for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is n8n best used for?
- n8n is most often used for building ai agents and workflow automation for technical teams, visual workflow design with capability to write custom javascript or python code, enterprise deployments with self-hosted or cloud options, integrating 500+ pre-built applications with custom api connections. Of those, building ai agents and workflow automation for technical teams and visual workflow design with capability to write custom javascript or python code are not what Nango is typically brought in for.
- What can n8n do that Nango cannot?
- n8n covers Workflow automation, Visual editor, Conditional execution, Looping. Nango covers Managed OAuth, Pre-built integrations, Custom syncs and actions, Incremental sync. Both handle Webhooks, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
n8n: Is there a free version of n8n?
Yes, n8n Community Edition is free and open-source, available for self-hosting on GitHub with unlimited users and workflows.
SourceNango: Is Nango open source?
It is source available under Elastic License 2.0. You can read, modify and self-host it, but you cannot offer it to third parties as a managed service. That is not the same as an OSI approved open source licence.
n8n: What is the difference between n8n plans?
Plans differ by monthly workflow executions (2,500 for Starter, 10,000 for Pro, 40,000 for Business), concurrent execution limits, AI credits, and shared project counts.
SourceNango: How is it priced?
Per connection per month, where a connection is one authorised end-user account. Free to 10 connections, 50 dollars a month for Starter with 20, 500 for Growth with 100, and one dollar per additional connection.
n8n: Does n8n offer annual billing discounts?
Yes, n8n offers 17% off when billing annually instead of monthly, and provides a Startup Plan at 50% off Business pricing for companies under 20 employees.
SourceNango: Can we integrate an API Nango does not support?
Yes. Custom syncs and actions in TypeScript cover any API including internal ones, which is the main advantage over closed unified API products.
Nango: Can we self-host it?
Yes, under the Elastic License 2.0 terms, which permit self-hosting for your own use but not resale as a service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- n8n vs Activiti
- n8n vs Parabola
- n8n vs Automate.io
- n8n vs Integromat
- n8n vs Celigo
- n8n vs Zapier
- n8n vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n vs Paragon
- n8n vs Workato
- n8n vs Nintex
- n8n vs Tray.io
- n8n vs Autonoly
- n8n vs Prefect
- n8n vs Automation Anywhere
- n8n vs Blue Prism
- n8n vs CrewAI
- n8n vs Mage AI
- n8n vs Alloy Automation
- n8n vs Merge
- n8n vs Windmill
- n8n vs Meltano
- n8n vs RudderStack
- n8n vs Flowable
- n8n vs Grouparoo
- n8n vs Airbyte
- n8n vs Cyclr
- Nango vs Activiti
- Nango vs Parabola
- Nango vs Automate.io
- Nango vs Integromat
- Nango vs Celigo
- Nango vs Zapier
- Nango vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Nango vs Paragon
- Nango vs Workato
- Nango vs Nintex
- Nango vs Tray.io
- Nango vs Autonoly
- Nango vs Prefect
- Nango vs Automation Anywhere
- Nango vs Blue Prism
- Nango vs CrewAI
- Nango vs Mage AI
- Nango vs Alloy Automation
- Nango vs Merge
- Nango vs Windmill
- Nango vs Meltano
- Nango vs RudderStack
- Nango vs Flowable
- Nango vs Grouparoo
- Nango vs Airbyte
- Nango vs Cyclr

