Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Skopeo

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Skopeo
Cloud
Inspect, copy and sign container images without pulling them
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Skopeo single-purpose: it neither builds nor runs images, so it is one tool in a chain rather than a solution
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Skopeo covers Remote inspection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Skopeo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Skopeo |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Linux, macOS |
| Category | Networking | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Skopeo
- Remote inspection
- Registry-to-registry copy
- Format conversion
- Image signing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Skopeo
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Skopeo
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Skopeo
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Skopeo
Skopeo
- Promoting images between staging and production registries without a round tripnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Inspecting an image’s contents before deciding to deploy itnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Mirroring images into an air-gapped or internal registrynot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Skopeo
- Single-purpose: it neither builds nor runs images, so it is one tool in a chain rather than a solution
- Command syntax with transport prefixes such as docker:// is unusual and trips people up initially
- Documentation is sparse compared with the rest of the container ecosystem
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Skopeo
Free- SkopeoFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Skopeo if
- You need remote inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS.
- You also want registry-to-registry copy.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Skopeo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Skopeo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Skopeo?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Skopeo at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Skopeo run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Skopeo runs on Linux, macOS.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Skopeo is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Skopeo cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Skopeo covers Remote inspection, Registry-to-registry copy, Format conversion, Image signing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Skopeo: Is Skopeo free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Eclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Skopeo: Why copy images without pulling them?
A registry-to-registry copy avoids downloading and re-uploading gigabytes, which is faster and much cheaper on bandwidth in CI.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Skopeo: Can Skopeo run containers?
No. It only inspects, copies, signs and deletes images. Running them is Podman’s or Docker’s job.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Portworx
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs minikube
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Packer
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Porter
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zeabur
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Pulumi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Caddy
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs K3s
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs IBM Cloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Koyeb
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Microsoft Azure
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs containerd
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Vagrant
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Rancher
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Flux
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs kind
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Kustomize
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Linkerd
- Skopeo vs HiveMQ
- Skopeo vs Traefik
- Skopeo vs pfSense
- Skopeo vs OpenVPN
- Skopeo vs Icinga
- Skopeo vs Consul
- Skopeo vs LibreNMS
- Skopeo vs Zabbix
- Skopeo vs Nebula
- Skopeo vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Skopeo vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Skopeo vs Netdata
- Skopeo vs Catchpoint
- Skopeo vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Skopeo vs Portworx
- Skopeo vs minikube
- Skopeo vs Packer
- Skopeo vs Porter
- Skopeo vs Zeabur
- Skopeo vs Pulumi
- Skopeo vs Caddy
- Skopeo vs K3s
- Skopeo vs IBM Cloud
- Skopeo vs Koyeb
- Skopeo vs Microsoft Azure
- Skopeo vs containerd
- Skopeo vs Vagrant
- Skopeo vs Rancher
- Skopeo vs Flux
- Skopeo vs kind
- Skopeo vs Kustomize
- Skopeo vs Linkerd
