Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Packer

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Packer covers Image building.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Packer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Packer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Category | Networking | Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Packer
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Packer
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Packer
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Packer
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Packer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Packer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Packer?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Packer at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Packer run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Packer is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Packer cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Packer: How much does HashiCorp Packer cost?
Packer does not publish specific pricing on its website. The open-source Packer tool is free, while HCP Packer (HashiCorp's cloud-hosted version) offers a free trial, but detailed pricing requires contacting HashiCorp.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs DigitalOcean
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Grafana Cloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Neon
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Pulumi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Serverless Framework
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Rancher
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Puppet
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs SST
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Buildah
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Terragrunt
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Portworx
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cilium
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Contabo
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Coolify
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Crossplane
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Dokku
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs containerd
- Packer vs HiveMQ
- Packer vs Traefik
- Packer vs pfSense
- Packer vs OpenVPN
- Packer vs Icinga
- Packer vs Consul
- Packer vs LibreNMS
- Packer vs Zabbix
- Packer vs Nebula
- Packer vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Packer vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Packer vs Netdata
- Packer vs Catchpoint
- Packer vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Serverless Framework
- Packer vs Rancher
- Packer vs Puppet
- Packer vs SST
- Packer vs Buildah
- Packer vs Terragrunt
- Packer vs Portworx
- Packer vs Cilium
- Packer vs Contabo
- Packer vs Coolify
- Packer vs Crossplane
- Packer vs Dokku
- Packer vs containerd

