Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Vagrant

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Vagrant covers Box management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Vagrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Vagrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Category | Networking | Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Vagrant
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Vagrant
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Vagrant
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Vagrant?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Vagrant cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Vagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Vagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs DigitalOcean
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Neon
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Grafana Cloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Pulumi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Portworx
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Serverless Framework
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Podman
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Caddy
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Rancher
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Infracost
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Porter
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs SST
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Tencent Cloud
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Terragrunt
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Thanos
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zeabur
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs HiveMQ
- Vagrant vs Traefik
- Vagrant vs pfSense
- Vagrant vs OpenVPN
- Vagrant vs Icinga
- Vagrant vs Consul
- Vagrant vs LibreNMS
- Vagrant vs Zabbix
- Vagrant vs Nebula
- Vagrant vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Vagrant vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Vagrant vs Netdata
- Vagrant vs Catchpoint
- Vagrant vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin

