Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs Ping Identity

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Metasploit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $3/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Founded | 2000 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Ping Identity
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Ping Identity
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Metasploit
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Metasploit
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Metasploit
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or Ping Identity?
- Metasploit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Metasploit and $3/month for Ping Identity.
- Does Metasploit or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Yes. Metasploit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourcePing Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Metasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourcePing Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Metasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourcePing Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Metasploit vs Frontegg
- Metasploit vs Speakeasy
- Metasploit vs Akeyless
- Metasploit vs authentik
- Metasploit vs Logto
- Metasploit vs Authelia
- Metasploit vs Transmit Security
- Metasploit vs Delinea
- Metasploit vs Genetec Security Center
- Metasploit vs VMware Carbon Black
- Metasploit vs Rhombus Systems
- Metasploit vs Yoti
- Metasploit vs Avast One
- Metasploit vs Chainguard
- Metasploit vs Cosign
- Metasploit vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs 1Password
- Ping Identity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ping Identity vs Norton 360
- Ping Identity vs LastPass
- Ping Identity vs Burp Suite
- Ping Identity vs OWASP ZAP
- Ping Identity vs Syft
- Ping Identity vs Wireshark
- Ping Identity vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ping Identity vs Bitwarden
- Ping Identity vs Semgrep
- Ping Identity vs Passbolt
- Ping Identity vs RoboForm
- Ping Identity vs Sardine
- Ping Identity vs Semperis
- Ping Identity vs SentinelOne
- Ping Identity vs Shufti Pro
- Ping Identity vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
