Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Metasploit

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Metasploit covers Exploit database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Metasploit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authelia | Metasploit |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Desktop, Cli |
| Founded | Unknown | 2000 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Metasploit
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Metasploit
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Metasploit
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Authelia
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Authelia
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Metasploit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Metasploit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Metasploit?
- Authelia starts at Free and Metasploit at Free.
- Does Authelia or Metasploit run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Metasploit is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Metasploit cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Metasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Metasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authelia vs Norton 360
- Authelia vs LastPass
- Authelia vs Burp Suite
- Authelia vs OWASP ZAP
- Authelia vs Syft
- Authelia vs Wireshark
- Authelia vs HashiCorp Vault
- Authelia vs RoboForm
- Authelia vs Sardine
- Authelia vs Semperis
- Authelia vs SentinelOne
- Authelia vs Shufti Pro
- Authelia vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs authentik
- Metasploit vs Logto
- Metasploit vs Ory Kratos
- Metasploit vs Frontegg
- Metasploit vs Infisical
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Trivy
- Metasploit vs Chainguard
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Signicat
- Metasploit vs Silent Eight
- Metasploit vs Socket
- Metasploit vs Socure
- Metasploit vs SonicWall
- Metasploit vs Sophos Intercept X
- Metasploit vs Ory
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
