Cybersecurity · head to head
Logto vs Metasploit

Logto
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity and authentication infrastructure for apps and APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Logto advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.; Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- They diverge on capability: Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Metasploit covers Exploit database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Logto and Metasploit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Logto | Metasploit |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | web, api | Desktop, Cli |
| Founded | Unknown | 2000 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Logto
- Prebuilt sign-in UI
- Social connectors
- Role-based access control
- Multi-factor authentication
- Machine-to-machine apps
- Audit logs
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Logto
- Adding sign-in to a new SaaS productnot Metasploit
- Implementing SSO for B2B customersnot Metasploit
- Securing internal APIs with M2M tokensnot Metasploit
- Adding RBAC and organizations to a multi-tenant appnot Metasploit
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Logto
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Logto
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Logto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Logto
- Advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires contacting sales.
- Token-based billing can make cost forecasting harder than flat per-MAU pricing for high-traffic apps.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Logto
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 50,000 MAU
- 50K tokens included
- 3 applications
- Pro$24/month
- Unlimited MAU and applications
- 3 included API resources
- Passkey sign-in
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Which should you pick?
Choose Logto if
- You need prebuilt sign-in ui.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want social connectors.
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Logto or Metasploit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Logto starts at Free and Metasploit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Logto or Metasploit?
- Logto starts at Free and Metasploit at Free.
- Does Logto or Metasploit run on more platforms?
- Logto runs on web, api. Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Logto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Logto best used for?
- Logto is most often used for adding sign-in to a new saas product, implementing sso for b2b customers, securing internal apis with m2m tokens, adding rbac and organizations to a multi-tenant app. Of those, adding sign-in to a new saas product and implementing sso for b2b customers are not what Metasploit is typically brought in for.
- What can Logto do that Metasploit cannot?
- Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Social connectors, Role-based access control, Multi-factor authentication. Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Logto: What does Logto cost?
Logto offers a Free plan at $0/month, a Pro plan starting at $24/month with 50K free tokens included, and a custom-priced Enterprise plan. Extra add-ons like RBAC or MFA are billed separately on Pro.
SourceMetasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceLogto: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 50,000 monthly active users, 3 total applications, 1 machine-to-machine app, 3 social connectors, 1 webhook, and 3-day audit log retention.
SourceMetasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceLogto: How is usage metered?
Logto uses token-based billing: only access tokens issued for authentication and authorization activity are counted, rather than charging purely per MAU.
SourceMetasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Logto vs Ory
- Logto vs authentik
- Logto vs Authelia
- Logto vs Clerk
- Logto vs 1Password
- Logto vs Frontegg
- Logto vs Sigstore
- Logto vs Infisical
- Logto vs OWASP ZAP
- Logto vs Bitwarden
- Logto vs Semgrep
- Logto vs Veriff
- Logto vs Brave Browser
- Logto vs March Networks
- Logto vs Salient CompleteView
- Logto vs Sumsub
- Logto vs Tuta
- Logto vs Ory Kratos
- Logto vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Logto vs Norton 360
- Logto vs LastPass
- Logto vs Burp Suite
- Logto vs Syft
- Logto vs Wireshark
- Logto vs HashiCorp Vault
- Logto vs Passbolt
- Logto vs RoboForm
- Logto vs Sardine
- Logto vs Semperis
- Logto vs SentinelOne
- Logto vs Shufti Pro
- Logto vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs Ory
- Metasploit vs authentik
- Metasploit vs Authelia
- Metasploit vs Clerk
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Frontegg
- Metasploit vs Sigstore
- Metasploit vs Infisical
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Veriff
- Metasploit vs Brave Browser
- Metasploit vs March Networks
- Metasploit vs Salient CompleteView
- Metasploit vs Sumsub
- Metasploit vs Tuta
- Metasploit vs Ory Kratos
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
