Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs Mimecast

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Metasploit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and Mimecast actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $4/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | Email, Cloud, Collaboration |
| Founded | 2000 | 2003 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Mimecast
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Mimecast
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Mimecast
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Metasploit
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or Mimecast better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and Mimecast at $4/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or Mimecast?
- Metasploit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Metasploit and $4/month for Mimecast.
- Does Metasploit or Mimecast run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Yes. Metasploit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mimecast starts at $4/month.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what Mimecast is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that Mimecast cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceMimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceMetasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceMimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceMetasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs Proofpoint
- Metasploit vs Nessus
- Metasploit vs Qualys VMDR
- Metasploit vs Doppler
- Metasploit vs Chainguard
- Metasploit vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Metasploit vs Netwrix
- Metasploit vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Metasploit vs Transmit Security
- Metasploit vs TrustArc
- Metasploit vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Metasploit vs VMware Carbon Black
- Metasploit vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Burp Suite
- Mimecast vs OWASP ZAP
- Mimecast vs Syft
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs HashiCorp Vault
- Mimecast vs Bitwarden
- Mimecast vs Semgrep
- Mimecast vs Passbolt
- Mimecast vs RoboForm
- Mimecast vs Sardine
- Mimecast vs Semperis
- Mimecast vs SentinelOne
- Mimecast vs Shufti Pro
- Mimecast vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs WorkOS

