Cybersecurity · head to head
Metasploit vs Netwrix

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Netwrix
Cybersecurity
Data access governance and change auditing across Active Directory, file shares and Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Metasploit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only; Netwrix the portfolio is assembled from acquisitions, so consoles, agents and licensing metrics differ between products and the platform story is ahead of the engineering reality.
- They diverge on capability: Metasploit covers Exploit database, Netwrix covers Change auditing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Metasploit and Netwrix actually diverge.
| Attribute | Metasploit | Netwrix |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 2000 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
Only in Netwrix
- Change auditing
- Effective permissions
- Data classification
- Access remediation
- Threat detection
- Group policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot Netwrix
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot Netwrix
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot Netwrix
Netwrix
- An organisation that cannot tell an auditor who has access to a sensitive file share and needs an answer with evidencenot Metasploit
- A security team reducing ransomware blast radius by removing Everyone and Domain Users permissions from sensitive datanot Metasploit
- An IT team investigating an unexplained Active Directory change and needing the exact account, time and previous valuenot Metasploit
- A company responding to GDPR data subject access requests that must first locate personal data scattered across legacy sharesnot Metasploit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Netwrix
- The portfolio is assembled from acquisitions, so consoles, agents and licensing metrics differ between products and the platform story is ahead of the engineering reality.
- Licensing metrics vary by product, per enabled user for some and per managed asset for others, which makes assembling a multi-product quote unusually difficult to compare against a single-vendor competitor.
- Auditing agents and collectors add load to domain controllers and file servers, and large estates need careful sizing to avoid degrading the systems being monitored.
- It reports and remediates but does not enforce access decisions at request time, so it complements rather than replaces identity governance and buyers still need an IGA tool for certification workflows.
- Coverage is strongest on Microsoft estates; Linux, NAS appliances and non-Microsoft SaaS are supported unevenly and often need additional modules or trail behind on feature parity.
Pricing, plan by plan
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Netwrix
On request- Netwrix Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per enabled user or per managed asset depending on the product
- Auditing, data classification, privileged access and threat products licensed separately
- Netwrix 1Secure SaaS console with a 14-day free trial
Which should you pick?
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Choose Netwrix if
- You need change auditing.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want effective permissions.
Questions people ask
- Is Metasploit or Netwrix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Metasploit starts at Free and Netwrix at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Metasploit or Netwrix?
- Metasploit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Metasploit and On request for Netwrix.
- Does Metasploit or Netwrix run on more platforms?
- Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli. Netwrix runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Yes. Metasploit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Netwrix starts at On request.
- What is Metasploit best used for?
- Metasploit is most often used for penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities, validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable, running phishing and credential attack simulations on the pro edition. Of those, penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilities and validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitable are not what Netwrix is typically brought in for.
- What can Metasploit do that Netwrix cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules. Netwrix covers Change auditing, Effective permissions, Data classification, Access remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Metasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceNetwrix: Does it replace identity governance?
No. It shows you who has access and lets you fix it, but recertification campaigns and access request workflow are an IGA product.
Metasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceNetwrix: Is there a SaaS option?
Netwrix 1Secure is the cloud console covering data and identity visibility, with a 14-day free trial including full access.
Metasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceNetwrix: How is it priced?
Per enabled user or per managed asset depending on the product, quoted rather than published. Assume separate line items per module.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs Omada Identity
- Metasploit vs Tenable
- Metasploit vs One Identity
- Metasploit vs Securiti
- Metasploit vs Saviynt
- Metasploit vs Speakeasy
- Metasploit vs BigID
- Metasploit vs Doppler
- Metasploit vs Fenergo
- Metasploit vs Arnica
- Metasploit vs Mimecast
- Metasploit vs Chainguard
- Metasploit vs Envysion
- Metasploit vs Feedzai
- Metasploit vs Frontegg
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Metasploit vs Infisical
- Netwrix vs 1Password
- Netwrix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Netwrix vs Norton 360
- Netwrix vs LastPass
- Netwrix vs Burp Suite
- Netwrix vs OWASP ZAP
- Netwrix vs Syft
- Netwrix vs Wireshark
- Netwrix vs HashiCorp Vault
- Netwrix vs Bitwarden
- Netwrix vs Semgrep
- Netwrix vs Passbolt
- Netwrix vs RoboForm
- Netwrix vs Sardine
- Netwrix vs Semperis
- Netwrix vs SentinelOne
- Netwrix vs Shufti Pro
- Netwrix vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Netwrix vs Omada Identity
- Netwrix vs Tenable
- Netwrix vs One Identity
- Netwrix vs Securiti
- Netwrix vs Saviynt
- Netwrix vs Speakeasy
- Netwrix vs BigID
- Netwrix vs Doppler
- Netwrix vs Fenergo
- Netwrix vs Arnica
- Netwrix vs Mimecast
- Netwrix vs Chainguard
- Netwrix vs Envysion
- Netwrix vs Feedzai
- Netwrix vs Frontegg
- Netwrix vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Netwrix vs Infisical
