Cybersecurity · head to head
Mimecast vs Semperis

Semperis
Cybersecurity
Identity threat detection and Active Directory forest recovery for AD, Entra ID and Okta, from a privately held US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request; Semperis scope is limited to Active Directory, Entra ID and Okta, so an organisation whose critical identity lives elsewhere gets little from it, and the recovery value declines in direct proportion to how much has already moved off on-premises AD.
- They diverge on capability: Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Semperis covers Active Directory Forest Recovery.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mimecast and Semperis actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
Only in Semperis
- Active Directory Forest Recovery
- Malware-free restore
- Replication-stream monitoring
- Automated rollback
- Attack indicator scoring
- Entra ID and Okta coverage
- Purple Knight
- Forest Druid
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Semperis
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Semperis
Semperis
- An organisation that cannot answer an auditor or insurer asking how long it would take to rebuild Active Directory after a destructive attacknot Mimecast
- Post-incident recovery where domain controllers are compromised and restoring from system-state backup would reintroduce the attacker's footholdnot Mimecast
- Continuous detection of privileged group changes and directory-level tampering that domain controller security logs missnot Mimecast
- Hybrid estates where AD, Entra ID and Okta all matter and no single tool currently shows changes across the threenot Mimecast
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Semperis
- Scope is limited to Active Directory, Entra ID and Okta, so an organisation whose critical identity lives elsewhere gets little from it, and the recovery value declines in direct proportion to how much has already moved off on-premises AD.
- The licence buys tooling, not a proven runbook: forest recovery is only worth what your last rehearsal demonstrated, and a plan that has never been executed end to end in a lab is an untested assumption regardless of what was purchased.
- It overlaps with backup and directory management products from Quest, Veeam, Commvault and others, so the buyer must argue internally why a dedicated product is needed alongside a backup contract that already claims to protect Active Directory.
- Running Directory Services Protector well requires someone who understands AD internals, replication metadata and Tier 0 attack paths, and without that person the alerts on privileged changes are either ignored or auto-reverted in ways that break legitimate administration.
- Licensing is driven by identity object counts, so directories carrying years of stale user accounts and service principals pay for objects that should have been deleted, and the cleanup project that would reduce the bill is the one nobody has time for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Semperis
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Semperis review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Choose Semperis if
- You need active directory forest recovery.
- You also want malware-free restore.
Questions people ask
- Is Mimecast or Semperis better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mimecast starts at $4/month and Semperis at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mimecast or Semperis?
- Mimecast starts at $4/month and Semperis at On request.
- Does Mimecast or Semperis run on more platforms?
- Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration. Semperis runs on Web.
- What is Mimecast best used for?
- Mimecast is most often used for email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks, email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations. Of those, email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks and email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations are not what Semperis is typically brought in for.
- What can Mimecast do that Semperis cannot?
- Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking. Semperis covers Active Directory Forest Recovery, Malware-free restore, Replication-stream monitoring, Automated rollback.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceSemperis: Does this replace my backups?
No. It replaces the Active Directory recovery procedure specifically. You still need backups for everything else, and the point of Semperis is that a generic system-state backup of a domain controller is a poor way to recover a forest because it restores the operating system along with whatever compromised it.
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceSemperis: Is it useful if we are cloud-only on Entra ID?
Partly. Directory Services Protector covers Entra ID and Okta for change tracking and posture, but the forest recovery product, which is the strongest reason to buy, applies to on-premises Active Directory. A genuinely cloud-only organisation should weigh it against Microsoft's own tooling.
Semperis: Are Purple Knight and Forest Druid really free?
Yes, both are free downloads with no licence requirement, and they are widely used by organisations that are not Semperis customers. They are also, transparently, the top of the sales funnel.
Semperis: How long does forest recovery actually take?
The honest answer is whatever your rehearsal took. The vendor's case is hours instead of days, and automation genuinely removes most manual steps, but the number that matters for your board is the one from a test in your own environment.
Semperis: Does it require agents on domain controllers?
It collects directory changes from the AD replication stream, which is what lets it see changes that bypass the security log. Deployment details vary by product and version, so confirm the exact architecture against your domain controller change-control rules.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs NICE Actimize
- Mimecast vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Mimecast vs One Identity
- Mimecast vs Ping Identity
- Mimecast vs Signicat
- Mimecast vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Mimecast vs Authy
- Mimecast vs Baffle
- Mimecast vs Beyond Identity
- Mimecast vs BeyondTrust
- Mimecast vs Burp Suite
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender VPN
- Semperis vs Norton 360
- Semperis vs 1Password
- Semperis vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Semperis vs LastPass
- Semperis vs Proofpoint
- Semperis vs Nessus
- Semperis vs Qualys VMDR
- Semperis vs Doppler
- Semperis vs Chainguard
- Semperis vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Semperis vs Netwrix
- Semperis vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Semperis vs Transmit Security
- Semperis vs TrustArc
- Semperis vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Semperis vs VMware Carbon Black
- Semperis vs Wireshark
- Semperis vs WorkOS
- Semperis vs NICE Actimize
- Semperis vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Semperis vs One Identity
- Semperis vs Ping Identity
- Semperis vs Signicat
- Semperis vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Semperis vs Authy
- Semperis vs Baffle
- Semperis vs Beyond Identity
- Semperis vs BeyondTrust
- Semperis vs Burp Suite
- Semperis vs Bitdefender VPN

