Cybersecurity · head to head
Mimecast vs Sardine

Sardine
Cybersecurity
Device intelligence and behaviour biometrics for fraud and compliance
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request; Sardine signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- They diverge on capability: Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Sardine covers Device intelligence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mimecast and Sardine actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
Only in Sardine
- Device intelligence
- Behaviour biometrics
- Scam detection
- Onboarding risk scoring
- AML transaction monitoring
- Dispute and chargeback handling
- Rules editor
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Sardine
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Sardine
Sardine
- A neobank losing money to authorised push payment scams where the customer genuinely approved the transfernot Mimecast
- A crypto exchange trying to detect accounts being operated by remote access rather than by their ownernot Mimecast
- A fintech seeing synthetic identity signups that pass document verification but share device characteristicsnot Mimecast
- A lender wanting first party fraud signals at application time that a credit bureau file does not containnot Mimecast
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Sardine
- Signal quality depends on the SDK being embedded in your own web and mobile clients, so fraud improvements become dependent on your app release cycle and any coverage gap is a blind spot.
- Behavioural and device telemetry collection needs a documented lawful basis under GDPR, and EU privacy reviews frequently delay rollouts that were scoped as engineering work.
- Pricing is per session or per active user, so a consumer product with many low value sessions pays in proportion to traffic rather than to fraud exposure.
- As a younger private company it lacks the enforcement-tested audit history that a bank examiner expects, which makes it a harder sell inside a regulated bank than inside a fintech.
- It is strongest on session-time signals and weaker as a system of record for long horizon AML typologies, so larger institutions end up running it alongside a traditional monitoring platform rather than instead of one.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Sardine
On request- Sardine$undefined/year
- Priced per user session or per monthly active user
- Annual contract with volume commitment
- SDK for web, iOS and Android
Which should you pick?
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Choose Sardine if
- You need device intelligence.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want behaviour biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Mimecast or Sardine better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mimecast starts at $4/month and Sardine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mimecast or Sardine?
- Mimecast starts at $4/month and Sardine at On request.
- Does Mimecast or Sardine run on more platforms?
- Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration. Sardine runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Mimecast best used for?
- Mimecast is most often used for email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks, email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations. Of those, email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacks and email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisations are not what Sardine is typically brought in for.
- What can Mimecast do that Sardine cannot?
- Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking. Sardine covers Device intelligence, Behaviour biometrics, Scam detection, Onboarding risk scoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceSardine: Does Sardine do document verification?
It focuses on device, behavioural and transaction signals, and integrates identity verification providers rather than being one. Treat it as complementary to a KYC vendor.
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceSardine: What does it need from us to work?
An SDK in your web and mobile applications plus transaction feeds. Without the client side collector you lose the signals that differentiate it.
Sardine: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted, typically per session or per monthly active user with an annual volume commitment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs Unit21
- Mimecast vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Mimecast vs Feedzai
- Mimecast vs NICE Actimize
- Mimecast vs Socure
- Mimecast vs ThetaRay
- Mimecast vs Jumio
- Mimecast vs iDenfy
- Mimecast vs Silent Eight
- Mimecast vs Sumsub
- Mimecast vs Quantexa
- Mimecast vs TunnelBear
- Mimecast vs Vanta
- Mimecast vs Acunetix
- Mimecast vs Aikido
- Mimecast vs Arnica
- Mimecast vs Authelia
- Sardine vs Norton 360
- Sardine vs 1Password
- Sardine vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Sardine vs LastPass
- Sardine vs Proofpoint
- Sardine vs Nessus
- Sardine vs Qualys VMDR
- Sardine vs Doppler
- Sardine vs Chainguard
- Sardine vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Sardine vs Netwrix
- Sardine vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Sardine vs Transmit Security
- Sardine vs TrustArc
- Sardine vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Sardine vs VMware Carbon Black
- Sardine vs Wireshark
- Sardine vs WorkOS
- Sardine vs Unit21
- Sardine vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sardine vs Feedzai
- Sardine vs NICE Actimize
- Sardine vs Socure
- Sardine vs ThetaRay
- Sardine vs Jumio
- Sardine vs iDenfy
- Sardine vs Silent Eight
- Sardine vs Sumsub
- Sardine vs Quantexa
- Sardine vs TunnelBear
- Sardine vs Vanta
- Sardine vs Acunetix
- Sardine vs Aikido
- Sardine vs Arnica
- Sardine vs Authelia

