Databases · head to head
Memcached vs Postgres
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; Postgres each major version is supported for only 5 years after its initial release, after which it is end-of-life
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Postgres covers ACID compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and Postgres actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in Postgres
- ACID compliance
- Complex queries
- Foreign keys
- Triggers
- Views
- Stored procedures
- JSON/JSONB support
- Full-text search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Postgres
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Postgres
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Postgres
Postgres
- Running a general purpose relational database for applicationsnot Memcached
- Self-hosting an open source SQL database with no licence feenot Memcached
- Workloads needing extensions, JSON and full text search in one enginenot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Postgres
- Each major version is supported for only 5 years after its initial release, after which it is end-of-life
- Major version upgrades break on-disk compatibility and require a full dump and reload or the pg_upgrade tool
- New major versions ship about once a year, so staying supported means a disruptive upgrade cycle
- Minor releases contain only frequently-encountered bug fixes, low-risk fixes, security issues and data corruption fixes, so feature gaps are not addressed within a major version
- There is no vendor SLA; commercial support must be bought separately from third party professional services listed by the project
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Postgres
Free- Community EditionFree
- Full database features
- No limitations
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose Postgres if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- You also want complex queries.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or Postgres better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and Postgres at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or Postgres?
- Memcached starts at Free and Postgres at Free.
- Does Memcached or Postgres run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. Postgres runs on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what Postgres is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that Postgres cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. Postgres covers ACID compliance, Complex queries, Foreign keys, Triggers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Postgres: How much does PostgreSQL cost to use?
PostgreSQL is completely free to download, install, and use. No licensing fees, subscription costs, or per-seat charges apply. The database is open source under the PostgreSQL License. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Postgres: Are there commercial PostgreSQL support options available?
Official PostgreSQL (the project) is free. Commercial PostgreSQL services such as hosting, professional support, training, and managed database services are offered by third-party vendors, not the PostgreSQL project itself. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Postgres: Do I need a license to use PostgreSQL commercially?
No. PostgreSQL is open source under the PostgreSQL License, which permits free commercial use without royalties, licensing fees, or support obligations. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Linear
- Memcached vs Asana
- Memcached vs ClickUp
- Memcached vs Figma
- Memcached vs Supabase
- Memcached vs Redis
- Memcached vs Aha!
- Memcached vs Eclipse
- Memcached vs Excalidraw
- Memcached vs MongoDB
- Memcached vs Okta
- Memcached vs Notion
- Memcached vs Close
- Memcached vs Coda
- Memcached vs Drift
- Memcached vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Memcached vs LogRocket
- Memcached vs Neovim
- Postgres vs Dragonfly
- Postgres vs Valkey
- Postgres vs Readyset
- Postgres vs PostgreSQL
- Postgres vs DuckDB
- Postgres vs DynamoDB
- Postgres vs NATS
- Postgres vs Apache Pulsar
- Postgres vs Presto
- Postgres vs Timeplus
- Postgres vs RabbitMQ
- Postgres vs EMQX
- Postgres vs FaunaDB
- Postgres vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Postgres vs MotherDuck
- Postgres vs Neo4j
- Postgres vs Apache Kafka
- Postgres vs Firestore
- Postgres vs Linear
- Postgres vs Asana
- Postgres vs ClickUp
- Postgres vs Figma
- Postgres vs Supabase
- Postgres vs Redis
- Postgres vs Aha!
- Postgres vs Eclipse
- Postgres vs Excalidraw
- Postgres vs MongoDB
- Postgres vs Okta
- Postgres vs Notion
- Postgres vs Close
- Postgres vs Coda
- Postgres vs Drift
- Postgres vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Postgres vs LogRocket
- Postgres vs Neovim

