Databases · head to head
Memcached vs Supabase
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Supabase covers PostgreSQL database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and Supabase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Supabase
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Supabase
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Supabase
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot Memcached
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot Memcached
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot Memcached
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot Memcached
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or Supabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and Supabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or Supabase?
- Memcached starts at Free and Supabase at Free.
- Does Memcached or Supabase run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what Supabase is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that Supabase cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Supabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Cockroach Labs
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs Airtable
- Memcached vs Amazon Aurora
- Memcached vs Elasticsearch
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs PlanetScale
- Memcached vs Meilisearch
- Memcached vs Turso
- Memcached vs Azure SQL
- Memcached vs ClickHouse
- Memcached vs Couchbase
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs MariaDB
- Memcached vs Oracle Database
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs Firebolt
- Memcached vs Google Cloud SQL
- Memcached vs Asana
- Memcached vs ClickUp
- Memcached vs Linear
- Memcached vs Figma
- Memcached vs Kubernetes
- Memcached vs Notion
- Memcached vs Datadog
- Memcached vs Monday.com
- Memcached vs Terraform
- Memcached vs Docker
- Memcached vs Greenhouse
- Memcached vs Google Chrome
- Memcached vs Intercom
- Memcached vs Mozilla Firefox
- Memcached vs Okta
- Memcached vs PostHog
- Memcached vs Redis
- Memcached vs Amplitude
- Supabase vs Cockroach Labs
- Supabase vs PostgreSQL
- Supabase vs Airtable
- Supabase vs Amazon Aurora
- Supabase vs Elasticsearch
- Supabase vs Apache Kafka
- Supabase vs PlanetScale
- Supabase vs Meilisearch
- Supabase vs Turso
- Supabase vs Azure SQL
- Supabase vs ClickHouse
- Supabase vs Couchbase
- Supabase vs DuckDB
- Supabase vs MariaDB
- Supabase vs Oracle Database
- Supabase vs DataGrip
- Supabase vs Firebolt
- Supabase vs Google Cloud SQL
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Kubernetes
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs Datadog
- Supabase vs Monday.com
- Supabase vs Terraform
- Supabase vs Docker
- Supabase vs Greenhouse
- Supabase vs Google Chrome
- Supabase vs Intercom
- Supabase vs Mozilla Firefox
- Supabase vs Okta
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Amplitude


