Databases · head to head
Memcached vs Eclipse Mosquitto

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and Eclipse Mosquitto actually diverge.
| Attribute | Memcached | Eclipse Mosquitto |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker |
| Category | Databases | Networking |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Eclipse Mosquitto
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Memcached
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Memcached
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Memcached
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or Eclipse Mosquitto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and Eclipse Mosquitto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or Eclipse Mosquitto?
- Memcached starts at Free and Eclipse Mosquitto at Free.
- Does Memcached or Eclipse Mosquitto run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what Eclipse Mosquitto is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that Eclipse Mosquitto cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Memcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Eclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Memcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs HiveMQ
- Memcached vs Traefik
- Memcached vs pfSense
- Memcached vs OpenVPN
- Memcached vs Icinga
- Memcached vs Consul
- Memcached vs LibreNMS
- Memcached vs Zabbix
- Memcached vs Nebula
- Memcached vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Memcached vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Memcached vs Netdata
- Memcached vs Catchpoint
- Memcached vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Dragonfly
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Valkey
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Readyset
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PostgreSQL
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs DuckDB
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs DynamoDB
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs NATS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Apache Pulsar
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Presto
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Timeplus
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs RabbitMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs EMQX
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs FaunaDB
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MotherDuck
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Neo4j
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Apache Kafka
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Firestore
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
