Cybersecurity · head to head
LogicManager vs Sumsub

LogicManager
Cybersecurity
Enterprise risk management priced as a flat fee with unlimited users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LogicManager the flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LogicManager and Sumsub actually diverge.
| Attribute | LogicManager | Sumsub |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.35/verification |
| Pricing model | quote | Per verification |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LogicManager
- Risk taxonomy
- Unlimited users
- Risk assessments
- Third-party risk
- Internal audit
- Policy management
- Incident management
- Advisory support
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LogicManager
- A mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat eachnot Sumsub
- A risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affectnot Sumsub
- An organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trailnot Sumsub
- A company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicatednot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot LogicManager
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot LogicManager
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot LogicManager
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot LogicManager
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LogicManager
- The flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.
- Configuration depth means the taxonomy has to be designed properly before rollout, and organisations that skip that step end up with a structure that cannot answer the linkage questions the tool exists to answer.
- Reporting and dashboarding are functional rather than flexible, and teams wanting bespoke board reporting commonly export to Power BI, which reintroduces the manual step they were removing.
- Quantitative risk modelling is limited compared with specialist tools, so organisations needing Monte Carlo style loss simulation will need something else alongside it.
- The user interface is dated relative to newer compliance automation tools, and infrequent business users often need repeat training, which erodes the participation benefit that unlimited licensing is supposed to deliver.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
LogicManager
On request- LogicManager Platform$undefined/year
- Fixed annual fee, unlimited users
- Risk, audit, vendor, policy and incident modules
- Advisory analyst support included
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is LogicManager or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. LogicManager starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LogicManager or Sumsub?
- LogicManager starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does LogicManager or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- LogicManager runs on Web. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is LogicManager best used for?
- LogicManager is most often used for a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each, a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect, an organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trail, a company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicated. Of those, a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each and a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can LogicManager do that Sumsub cannot?
- LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Unlimited users, Risk assessments, Third-party risk. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LogicManager: Is LogicManager really unlimited users?
Yes. It licences on a fixed annual fee covering the organisation rather than per seat, which is the main reason mid-market buyers pick it.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
LogicManager: What does it cost?
Not published. Mid-market ERM platforms of this class typically sit in the low tens of thousands of dollars a year, quoted by scope.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
LogicManager: Is it a compliance automation tool like Drata?
No. It is enterprise risk management with audit and vendor risk, not continuous control monitoring for SOC 2 evidence collection.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
LogicManager: How long does implementation take?
Weeks to a few months, far shorter than the enterprise GRC suites, provided the risk taxonomy is agreed up front.
Related pages
More on LogicManager
Other head to heads
- LogicManager vs Resolver
- LogicManager vs Diligent
- LogicManager vs MetricStream
- LogicManager vs Drata
- LogicManager vs Silent Eight
- LogicManager vs NICE Actimize
- LogicManager vs Rhombus Systems
- LogicManager vs Trulioo
- LogicManager vs Trend Micro Vision One
- LogicManager vs IBM QRadar
- LogicManager vs Motorola Vigilant
- LogicManager vs VMware Carbon Black
- LogicManager vs Quantexa
- LogicManager vs Termly
- LogicManager vs Transcend
- LogicManager vs WireGuard
- LogicManager vs Akeyless
- LogicManager vs DataGrail
- LogicManager vs Shufti Pro
- LogicManager vs Jumio
- LogicManager vs Socure
- LogicManager vs Signicat
- LogicManager vs iDenfy
- LogicManager vs Veriff
- LogicManager vs IDnow
- LogicManager vs Fenergo
- LogicManager vs Yoti
- LogicManager vs Microsoft Sentinel
- LogicManager vs Mimecast
- LogicManager vs Nessus
- LogicManager vs NordPass
- LogicManager vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Resolver
- Sumsub vs Diligent
- Sumsub vs MetricStream
- Sumsub vs Drata
- Sumsub vs Silent Eight
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Rhombus Systems
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Sumsub vs IBM QRadar
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs VMware Carbon Black
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs Termly
- Sumsub vs Transcend
- Sumsub vs WireGuard
- Sumsub vs Akeyless
- Sumsub vs DataGrail
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
