Legal · head to head
CASEpeer vs Lawmatics

CASEpeer
Legal
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
- From
- $79/month
- Rated
- -

Lawmatics
Legal
Legal CRM, client intake and marketing automation platform with a 3-user minimum that sets an effective entry floor of roughly $447 a month
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CASEpeer it is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.; Lawmatics the 3-user minimum on the entry plan means a solo attorney or two-person firm pays for capacity it does not need, pushing the real floor to $447 a month regardless of headcount.
- They diverge on capability: CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Lawmatics covers Lead pipeline.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CASEpeer and Lawmatics actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CASEpeer
- Intake and case screening
- Medical treatment tracking
- Settlement and lien management
- Negotiation tracking
- Statute of limitations monitoring
Only in Lawmatics
- Lead pipeline
- Automated intake sequences
- E-signature retainers
- Custom intake forms
- Marketing automation
- Appointment scheduling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CASEpeer
- Plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien trackingnot Lawmatics
- Contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one placenot Lawmatics
- Personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measurednot Lawmatics
- Firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseloadnot Lawmatics
Lawmatics
- A personal injury or family law firm losing prospective clients to slow follow-up on inbound leadsnot CASEpeer
- A firm wanting automated e-signature retainers so a signed engagement letter does not depend on staff remembering to send onenot CASEpeer
- An immigration or high-volume practice needing multilingual, multi-step intake sequences before a case is openednot CASEpeer
- A firm wanting marketing attribution to know which referral source or ad spend is actually converting to signed clientsnot CASEpeer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CASEpeer
- It is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.
- There is no full double-entry general ledger, so the firm still needs separate accounting software and somebody to reconcile between the two.
- The narrow personal injury focus means a practice that diversifies into family, employment or criminal work has to run a second system or migrate.
- It has changed corporate hands three times since 2021, from independent to MyCase to AffiniPay, now trading as 8am, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to put to the vendor.
- Sitting in the 8am group aligns it with LawPay and MyCase, so firms committed to a different payments provider get less from the integrations.
Lawmatics
- The 3-user minimum on the entry plan means a solo attorney or two-person firm pays for capacity it does not need, pushing the real floor to $447 a month regardless of headcount.
- It is a CRM and intake tool, not case management, so most firms end up paying for Lawmatics on top of a separate practice management subscription rather than instead of one.
- Annual contracts are typical, which reduces flexibility for a firm that is not certain the automation will convert enough additional clients to justify the cost.
- Marketing automation features assume a firm has enough lead volume and marketing spend to benefit from attribution reporting, which makes it overbuilt for a low-volume boutique practice.
- Migrating intake workflows and email sequences out of Lawmatics if a firm switches CRMs is a manual rebuild, since sequences are not portable to competing tools.
Pricing, plan by plan
CASEpeer
$79/month- Basic$79/month
- Personal injury case management
- Intake and treatment tracking
- No minimum seat count
- Pro$119/month
- Adds reporting and automation
- Lien and settlement tracking
- No long-term contract required
- Advanced$149/month
- Full feature set
- Advanced reporting
- No long-term contract required
Lawmatics
On request- Basic$undefined/month
- 3-user minimum sets the effective floor at $447/month
- Lead pipeline, intake automation, e-signature, scheduling
- Annual contract typically required
Which should you pick?
Choose CASEpeer if
- You need intake and case screening.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want medical treatment tracking.
Choose Lawmatics if
- You need lead pipeline.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want automated intake sequences.
Questions people ask
- Is CASEpeer or Lawmatics better?
- Neither clearly leads. CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Lawmatics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Lawmatics?
- CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Lawmatics at On request.
- Does CASEpeer or Lawmatics run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is CASEpeer best used for?
- CASEpeer is most often used for plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking, contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place, personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measured, firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseload. Of those, plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking and contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place are not what Lawmatics is typically brought in for.
- What can CASEpeer do that Lawmatics cannot?
- CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Medical treatment tracking, Settlement and lien management, Negotiation tracking. Lawmatics covers Lead pipeline, Automated intake sequences, E-signature retainers, Custom intake forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CASEpeer: Is CASEpeer suitable for a corporate or defence firm?
No. It is built around contingency personal injury work: treatment, liens and settlement. A corporate firm billing hourly should look at Clio, Tabs3 or a large firm system instead.
Lawmatics: What is the actual entry price?
The Basic plan requires a 3-user minimum, which puts effective monthly cost at roughly $447 even if fewer than three people will log in.
CASEpeer: What does CASEpeer cost?
Published per-user rates are 79 USD for Basic, 119 USD for Pro and 149 USD for Advanced per month, with no minimum seat count and no long-term contract required.
Lawmatics: Does Lawmatics replace case management software?
No. It handles client acquisition and intake; firms typically run it alongside Clio, MyCase or similar for matter and case management.
CASEpeer: Who owns CASEpeer?
It was acquired by MyCase in March 2021 and moved to AffiniPay in June 2022. AffiniPay rebranded to 8am in August 2025, so CASEpeer now sits alongside MyCase and LawPay in that group.
Lawmatics: Is it worth it for a low-volume practice?
Marketing automation and lead attribution assume meaningful inbound volume, so a boutique practice with few new matters a month may not see proportional value.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CASEpeer vs Filevine
- CASEpeer vs Clio
- CASEpeer vs MyCase
- CASEpeer vs LexisNexis
- CASEpeer vs Docketwise
- CASEpeer vs Litify
- CASEpeer vs Relativity
- CASEpeer vs Everlaw
- CASEpeer vs Smokeball
- CASEpeer vs Logikcull
- CASEpeer vs DISCO
- CASEpeer vs iManage
- CASEpeer vs Intapp
- CASEpeer vs Litera
- CASEpeer vs Rocket Matter
- CASEpeer vs Secure Privacy
- CASEpeer vs Tabs3
- CASEpeer vs Harvey
- CASEpeer vs Aderant
- CASEpeer vs iubenda
- CASEpeer vs CosmoLex
- CASEpeer vs Westlaw
- CASEpeer vs Cookiebot
- Lawmatics vs Filevine
- Lawmatics vs Clio
- Lawmatics vs MyCase
- Lawmatics vs LexisNexis
- Lawmatics vs Docketwise
- Lawmatics vs Litify
- Lawmatics vs Relativity
- Lawmatics vs Everlaw
- Lawmatics vs Smokeball
- Lawmatics vs Logikcull
- Lawmatics vs DISCO
- Lawmatics vs iManage
- Lawmatics vs Intapp
- Lawmatics vs Litera
- Lawmatics vs Rocket Matter
- Lawmatics vs Secure Privacy
- Lawmatics vs Tabs3
- Lawmatics vs Harvey
- Lawmatics vs Aderant
- Lawmatics vs iubenda
- Lawmatics vs CosmoLex
- Lawmatics vs Westlaw
- Lawmatics vs Cookiebot
