Backup · head to head
Clumio vs Kopia

Clumio
Backup
Serverless AWS backup with published per-gigabyte rates and explicit restore charges
- From
- $0.01/month
- Rated
- -

Kopia
Backup
Open source deduplicating backup with client side encryption and a repository on almost any storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kopia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Clumio restore is charged at $0.040 per GiB plus data transfer out, so recovering a hundred terabytes in an incident costs thousands of dollars on top of the storage fee, a bill nobody budgets for.; Kopia space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- They diverge on capability: Clumio covers Air-gapped backups, Kopia covers Content defined chunking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clumio and Kopia actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clumio
- Air-gapped backups
- Fifteen-minute recovery points
- S3 SecureVault
- Backtrack
- Terraform provider
- Compliance attestations
Only in Kopia
- Content defined chunking
- Global deduplication
- Pack blobs
- Client side encryption
- Desktop and command line
- Repository verification
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clumio
- An AWS-native company needing backups outside its own account so a compromised root credential cannot delete themnot Kopia
- A team that has to model recovery cost before an incident rather than discover it during onenot Kopia
- An organisation protecting billions of S3 objects where per-object charges dominate per-gigabyte chargesnot Kopia
- A regulated business needing SOC 2, HIPAA and PCI-DSS attested backup without running backup serversnot Kopia
Kopia
- Backing up laptops and workstations to cheap object storage with a desktop interface rather than a cron jobnot Clumio
- Deduplicating backups of several similar machines into one repository so common content is stored oncenot Clumio
- Replacing a chunk based tool whose per object charges made a cheap bucket expensivenot Clumio
- Keeping an encrypted offsite copy where the storage provider must never be able to read the contentsnot Clumio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clumio
- Restore is charged at $0.040 per GiB plus data transfer out, so recovering a hundred terabytes in an incident costs thousands of dollars on top of the storage fee, a bill nobody budgets for.
- Per-object charges of $1.50 per million managed objects per month mean estates with billions of small objects pay far more than a per-gigabyte estimate suggests.
- The archive tier is cheaper to store but restores begin only after 24 to 48 hours, which is incompatible with most recovery time objectives, and early deletion inside six months incurs a fee.
- It is an AWS product; Azure workloads are on the roadmap rather than shipping, so multi-cloud organisations still need a second backup platform.
- The Commvault acquisition means Clumio now overlaps with Commvault own cloud protection, and buyers should ask directly how the two portfolios converge before signing multi-year terms.
Kopia
- Space is only reclaimed when maintenance runs, and in a shared repository full maintenance is owned by one client, so if that machine goes away the repository grows for ever while every backup still reports success.
- The repository format has changed across versions and mixing client versions against one repository is discouraged, so a fleet must be upgraded together rather than machine by machine.
- There is no central orchestration or reporting for many machines, so monitoring a fleet means building your own alerting around exit codes.
- Restoring many small files is slower than the backup was, because content must be reassembled from pack blobs, and this is rarely tested until the day it matters.
- Encryption is client side with no escrow, so a lost repository password means the data is unrecoverable and there is no vendor to appeal to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clumio
$0.01/month- S3 SecureVault Standard$0.025/month
- $0.025 per GiB-month plus $1.50 per million managed objects per month
- Restores $0.040 per GiB instant access and $0.09 per GiB retrieved
- $0.025 per 1,000 API requests, data transfer out charged separately
- S3 SecureVault Archive$0.01/month
- $0.010 per GiB-month plus $1.50 per million managed objects per month
- Restores begin after 24 to 48 hours
- $0.040 per GiB restored plus data transfer out
- Backtrack$undefined/month
- $1.50 per million managed objects-month, included free with SecureVault
- $0.50 per million objects processed on restore
- Metadata change tracking rather than full backup
Kopia
Free- KopiaFree
- Full functionality, no data limit
- Desktop application included
- Any supported storage back end
Which should you pick?
Choose Clumio if
- You need air-gapped backups.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want fifteen-minute recovery points.
Choose Kopia if
- You need content defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want global deduplication.
Questions people ask
- Is Clumio or Kopia better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clumio starts at $0.01/month and Kopia at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clumio or Kopia?
- Kopia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.01/month for Clumio and Free for Kopia.
- Does Clumio or Kopia run on more platforms?
- Clumio runs on Web, API. Kopia runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Kopia for free?
- Yes. Kopia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clumio starts at $0.01/month.
- What is Clumio best used for?
- Clumio is most often used for an aws-native company needing backups outside its own account so a compromised root credential cannot delete them, a team that has to model recovery cost before an incident rather than discover it during one, an organisation protecting billions of s3 objects where per-object charges dominate per-gigabyte charges, a regulated business needing soc 2, hipaa and pci-dss attested backup without running backup servers. Of those, an aws-native company needing backups outside its own account so a compromised root credential cannot delete them and a team that has to model recovery cost before an incident rather than discover it during one are not what Kopia is typically brought in for.
- What can Clumio do that Kopia cannot?
- Clumio covers Air-gapped backups, Fifteen-minute recovery points, S3 SecureVault, Backtrack. Kopia covers Content defined chunking, Global deduplication, Pack blobs, Client side encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clumio: What does a restore cost?
$0.040 per GiB for instant access, $0.09 per GiB retrieved from archive, $0.025 per 1,000 API requests, plus AWS data transfer out. Model this before an incident.
Kopia: Is a partly corrupt repository still restorable?
Partly. Deduplication means one damaged pack blob affects every snapshot referencing its contents, but unaffected files still restore. Run verification regularly rather than assuming.
Clumio: Does it support Azure?
Not yet. Azure workloads are listed as on the roadmap. Today it is AWS, with some Google Cloud Storage coverage.
Kopia: How does it compare with restic?
Similar guarantees, with packing that behaves better on per operation billing, a desktop interface, and compression enabled by default.
Clumio: Is it still Clumio after the Commvault acquisition?
Yes, sold as Clumio by Commvault with its own pricing page and product line, but ask about portfolio convergence on a multi-year deal.
Kopia: Do I need to run maintenance manually?
It is scheduled automatically by default, but you must ensure the client that owns full maintenance keeps running, otherwise deleted snapshots never free space.
Kopia: Can several machines share one repository?
Yes, and that is where deduplication pays off, but they should run compatible versions and only one owns full maintenance.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clumio vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Clumio vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Clumio vs Redstor
- Clumio vs Duplicacy
- Clumio vs Amanda Enterprise
- Clumio vs Backupify
- Clumio vs Spanning Backup
- Clumio vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Clumio vs Rewind
- Clumio vs CloudCasa
- Clumio vs AOMEI Backupper
- Clumio vs HYCU
- Clumio vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Clumio vs Datto Backup
- Clumio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Clumio vs MSP360 Backup
- Clumio vs N-able Backup
- Clumio vs rustic
- Clumio vs Borg Backup
- Clumio vs Restic
- Clumio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Clumio vs UrBackup
- Clumio vs Velero
- Clumio vs Portworx Backup
- Clumio vs Trilio
- Clumio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Clumio vs BDRShield
- Kopia vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Kopia vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Kopia vs Redstor
- Kopia vs Duplicacy
- Kopia vs Amanda Enterprise
- Kopia vs Backupify
- Kopia vs Spanning Backup
- Kopia vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Kopia vs Rewind
- Kopia vs CloudCasa
- Kopia vs AOMEI Backupper
- Kopia vs HYCU
- Kopia vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Kopia vs Datto Backup
- Kopia vs HPE StoreOnce
- Kopia vs MSP360 Backup
- Kopia vs N-able Backup
- Kopia vs rustic
- Kopia vs Borg Backup
- Kopia vs Restic
- Kopia vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Kopia vs UrBackup
- Kopia vs Velero
- Kopia vs Portworx Backup
- Kopia vs Trilio
- Kopia vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Kopia vs BDRShield
