Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Terragrunt

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Terragrunt does not also cover.
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Terragrunt
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Terragrunt
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Terragrunt
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Terragrunt
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Keycloak
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Keycloak
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Terragrunt?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceTerragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Pulumi
- Keycloak vs Infracost
- Keycloak vs Packer
- Keycloak vs Serverless Framework
- Keycloak vs SST
- Keycloak vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Keycloak vs Cerebrium
- Keycloak vs Go
- Keycloak vs Rancher
- Keycloak vs Anyscale
- Keycloak vs Linkerd
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Azure
- Keycloak vs Nitric
- Keycloak vs OpenEBS
- Keycloak vs OVHcloud
- Keycloak vs Nomad
- Keycloak vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Penpot
- Terragrunt vs Soketi
- Terragrunt vs Ansible
- Terragrunt vs Atlantis
- Terragrunt vs Vite
- Terragrunt vs Depot
- Terragrunt vs Pants Build
- Terragrunt vs Buildkite
- Terragrunt vs Coder
- Terragrunt vs Jitsu
- Terragrunt vs Bitbucket
- Terragrunt vs Sweep
- Terragrunt vs Azure DevOps
- Terragrunt vs Backstage
- Terragrunt vs Claude Code
- Terragrunt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Terragrunt vs Cody
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
