Cloud · head to head
Cerebrium vs Keycloak

Cerebrium
Cloud
Serverless GPU infrastructure for real-time AI inference and applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cerebrium free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerebrium and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerebrium
- Ultra-fast cold starts
- Elastic scaling
- Bring your own code
- Multi-region failover
- WebSocket and streaming
- Asynchronous jobs
- CI/CD with gradual rollouts
- OpenTelemetry integration
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Cerebrium does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerebrium
- Deploying voice agents and conversational AI applicationsnot Keycloak
- Video and image model serving with low latencynot Keycloak
- LLM inference and completion endpointsnot Keycloak
- Real-time embeddings and vector database operationsnot Keycloak
- Distributed model training with hyperparameter sweepsnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Cerebrium
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Cerebrium
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Cerebrium
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Cerebrium
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Cerebrium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerebrium
- Free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard plan at $100/month required for production deployments
- Per-second compute pricing requires continuous cost monitoring
- Storage costs add up for large model files
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerebrium
Free- HobbyFree
- 3 user seats
- Up to 3 deployed apps
- 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard$100/month
- Unlimited seats and apps
- 30 GPU concurrency
- Custom domains
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Unlimited resources
- Volume discounts
- Dedicated support
- GPU Compute$undefined/per-second
- T4: $0.000164/s
- H100: $0.00167/s
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerebrium if
- You need ultra-fast cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker.
- You also want elastic scaling.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerebrium or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerebrium starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerebrium or Keycloak?
- Cerebrium starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Cerebrium or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Cerebrium runs on Cloud, Docker. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Cerebrium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cerebrium best used for?
- Cerebrium is most often used for deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications, video and image model serving with low latency, llm inference and completion endpoints, real-time embeddings and vector database operations. Of those, deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications and video and image model serving with low latency are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerebrium do that Keycloak cannot?
- Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Elastic scaling, Bring your own code, Multi-region failover.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cerebrium: Is Cerebrium only for inference or can it train models?
Cerebrium supports both inference serving and model training with hyperparameter sweeps. It enables deployment of voice agents, LLMs, video models, and other AI applications.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceCerebrium: How do the cold starts compare to other platforms?
Cerebrium achieves 2-4 second cold starts through memory and GPU snapshotting, significantly faster than traditional 30+ second cold boots. This is competitive with platforms like Beam Cloud.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceCerebrium: What compliance certifications does Cerebrium have?
Cerebrium maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance, HIPAA certification, GDPR compliance, and ISO certification. It provides gVisor container isolation and configurable data residency for regulated workloads.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cerebrium vs Beam Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Lambda
- Cerebrium vs Anyscale
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs Deno Deploy
- Cerebrium vs Serverless Framework
- Cerebrium vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cerebrium vs Upstash
- Cerebrium vs Neon
- Cerebrium vs Fireworks AI
- Cerebrium vs Porter
- Cerebrium vs Fastly
- Cerebrium vs Kustomize
- Cerebrium vs Microsoft Azure
- Cerebrium vs Nitric
- Cerebrium vs Nomad
- Cerebrium vs Linkerd
- Cerebrium vs Penpot
- Cerebrium vs Soketi
- Cerebrium vs Ansible
- Cerebrium vs Atlantis
- Cerebrium vs Vite
- Cerebrium vs Depot
- Cerebrium vs Pants Build
- Cerebrium vs Buildkite
- Cerebrium vs Coder
- Cerebrium vs Jitsu
- Cerebrium vs Bitbucket
- Cerebrium vs Sweep
- Cerebrium vs Azure DevOps
- Cerebrium vs Backstage
- Cerebrium vs Claude Code
- Cerebrium vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cerebrium vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Beam Cloud
- Keycloak vs Lambda
- Keycloak vs Anyscale
- Keycloak vs Koyeb
- Keycloak vs Deno Deploy
- Keycloak vs Serverless Framework
- Keycloak vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Keycloak vs Upstash
- Keycloak vs Neon
- Keycloak vs Fireworks AI
- Keycloak vs Porter
- Keycloak vs Fastly
- Keycloak vs Kustomize
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Azure
- Keycloak vs Nitric
- Keycloak vs Nomad
- Keycloak vs Linkerd
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
