Developer Tools · head to head
Backstage vs Terragrunt

Backstage
Developer Tools
Open source internal developer portal framework created and open sourced by Spotify
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backstage backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: Backstage covers Software catalogue, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backstage and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Backstage | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backstage
- Software catalogue
- Software templates
- TechDocs
- Plugin architecture
- Kubernetes plugin
- Search
- Entity ownership model
- Auth provider integrations
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backstage
- An engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morningnot Terragrunt
- A platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, CI and security defaults already wired innot Terragrunt
- A company consolidating scattered READMEs and Confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticednot Terragrunt
- A regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classificationnot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Backstage
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Backstage
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Backstage
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backstage
- Backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.
- Upstream releases move quickly and plugin APIs have broken across major versions, so a customised deployment accumulates upgrade debt and teams routinely fall months behind on versions they cannot cheaply catch up on.
- The catalogue is only as good as the YAML descriptors engineers remember to write; without enforcement the register drifts out of date, and a developer portal nobody trusts is abandoned faster than one that never existed.
- Community plugin quality varies sharply, with many unmaintained or pinned to old core versions, so the plugin that made the business case may be the one blocking your next upgrade.
- Spotify Portal, the packaged commercial route, publishes no price at all and is quoted as a custom annual subscription, so the only cost you can actually forecast up front is the self-hosted one, which is the option with the largest hidden staffing bill.
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Backstage
Free- Backstage (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Software catalogue, templates, TechDocs and search
- Full plugin ecosystem
- Spotify Portal for Backstage$undefined/year
- Packaged commercial distribution from Spotify
- Spotify premium plugins including Soundcheck and Insights
- Simplified setup and managed upgrade path
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Backstage if
- You need software catalogue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want software templates.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Backstage or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backstage starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backstage or Terragrunt?
- Backstage starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does Backstage or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Backstage runs on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Backstage for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Backstage best used for?
- Backstage is most often used for an engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morning, a platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, ci and security defaults already wired in, a company consolidating scattered readmes and confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticed, a regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classification. Of those, an engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morning and a platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, ci and security defaults already wired in are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Backstage do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Backstage covers Software catalogue, Software templates, TechDocs, Plugin architecture. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backstage: Is Backstage free?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The real cost is engineering time; teams commonly dedicate one to two engineers permanently to running it.
Terragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceBackstage: Do I need to write code to use it?
Yes. Configuring and extending a Backstage application is a TypeScript and React project. This is the single most common misjudgement buyers make.
Terragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceBackstage: What is Spotify Portal for Backstage?
A commercial distribution from Spotify with premium plugins and support, generally available since October 2025 and sold as a quoted annual subscription with no published price.
Backstage: Who owns the project?
Spotify created and open sourced it; it is now a CNCF project, so the upstream roadmap is not solely Spotify controlled.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Backstage vs Harness
- Backstage vs Cortex
- Backstage vs OpsLevel
- Backstage vs Tilt
- Backstage vs Ansible
- Backstage vs Frappe
- Backstage vs Refact
- Backstage vs Soketi
- Backstage vs Visual Studio Code
- Backstage vs Penpot
- Backstage vs GNU Emacs
- Backstage vs Bazel
- Backstage vs Argo CD
- Backstage vs Atlantis
- Backstage vs Blacksmith
- Backstage vs Coder
- Backstage vs Garden
- Backstage vs GitLab CI/CD
- Backstage vs Pulumi
- Backstage vs Infracost
- Backstage vs Packer
- Backstage vs Serverless Framework
- Backstage vs SST
- Backstage vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Backstage vs Cerebrium
- Backstage vs Go
- Backstage vs Rancher
- Backstage vs Anyscale
- Backstage vs Linkerd
- Backstage vs Microsoft Azure
- Backstage vs Nitric
- Backstage vs OpenEBS
- Backstage vs OVHcloud
- Backstage vs Nomad
- Backstage vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Harness
- Terragrunt vs Cortex
- Terragrunt vs OpsLevel
- Terragrunt vs Tilt
- Terragrunt vs Ansible
- Terragrunt vs Frappe
- Terragrunt vs Refact
- Terragrunt vs Soketi
- Terragrunt vs Visual Studio Code
- Terragrunt vs Penpot
- Terragrunt vs GNU Emacs
- Terragrunt vs Bazel
- Terragrunt vs Argo CD
- Terragrunt vs Atlantis
- Terragrunt vs Blacksmith
- Terragrunt vs Coder
- Terragrunt vs Garden
- Terragrunt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
