Software · head to head
JMP vs Amazon Redshift ML
The short version
- Each has a real cost: JMP the Internet Archive's capture of JMP's homepage on 13 January 2020 named five distinct editions, JMP, JMP Live, JMP Pro, JMP Clinical, and JMP Genomics, each targeting a different analysis use case, with no price figure published for any.; Amazon Redshift ML free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million
- They diverge on capability: JMP covers Interactive statistics, Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JMP and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.
| Attribute | JMP | Amazon Redshift ML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | usage-based |
| Platforms | Mac, Windows | Web |
| Founded | 1976 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JMP
- Interactive statistics
- Dynamic visualization
- Design of experiments
- Predictive modeling
- Quality control
- SAS
- Python
- R
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML
- SageMaker integration
- BYOM support
- In-database predictions
- Amazon Redshift
- SageMaker
- S3
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JMP
- Machine learningnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Data analysisnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Model trainingnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Predictive analyticsnot Amazon Redshift ML
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training and running machine learning models directly from SQL inside Amazon Redshiftnot JMP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JMP
- The Internet Archive's capture of JMP's homepage on 13 January 2020 named five distinct editions, JMP, JMP Live, JMP Pro, JMP Clinical, and JMP Genomics, each targeting a different analysis use case, with no price figure published for any.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million
Pricing, plan by plan
JMP
Free- TrialFree
- 30-day trial
- Full features
- JMP$1785/year
- Core JMP
- Standard features
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
Which should you pick?
Choose JMP if
- You need interactive statistics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac, Windows.
- You also want dynamic visualization.
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl.
Questions people ask
- Is JMP or Amazon Redshift ML better?
- Neither clearly leads. JMP starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JMP or Amazon Redshift ML?
- JMP starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free.
- Does JMP or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
- JMP runs on Mac, Windows. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
- Can I use JMP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is JMP best used for?
- JMP is most often used for machine learning, data analysis, model training, predictive analytics. Of those, machine learning and data analysis are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
- What can JMP do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
- JMP covers Interactive statistics, Dynamic visualization, Design of experiments, Predictive modeling. Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML, SageMaker integration, BYOM support.
Related pages
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- JMP vs AWS SageMaker
- JMP vs Google Vertex AI
- JMP vs Azure Machine Learning
- JMP vs DataRobot
- JMP vs Snowflake
- JMP vs TensorFlow
- JMP vs Comet ML
- JMP vs Keras
- JMP vs MLflow
- JMP vs Jupyter
- JMP vs PyTorch
- JMP vs scikit-learn
- JMP vs Apache Spark MLlib
- JMP vs Weights & Biases
- JMP vs Alteryx
- JMP vs Anaconda
- JMP vs Databricks
- JMP vs Dataiku
- Amazon Redshift ML vs AWS SageMaker
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Snowflake
- Amazon Redshift ML vs TensorFlow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Comet ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Keras
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MLflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Jupyter
- Amazon Redshift ML vs PyTorch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weights & Biases
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Alteryx
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Anaconda
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Dataiku


