Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

Minitab vs Amazon Redshift ML

Minitab logo

Minitab

Machine Learning

Statistical software for quality engineering, and the tool Six Sigma training is written around

From
$2394/year
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Amazon Redshift ML logo

Amazon Redshift ML

Machine Learning

SQL statements in Redshift that train models on SageMaker and return them as functions

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Amazon Redshift ML has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Minitab licensing is a per named user subscription, so an organisation where fifty engineers each need it twice a quarter pays fifty full seats for people who open it eight times a year.; Amazon Redshift ML training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
  • They diverge on capability: Minitab covers Control charts, Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Minitab and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.

Attributes where Minitab and Amazon Redshift ML differ
AttributeMinitabAmazon Redshift ML
Starting price$2394/yearFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionusage-based
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsMac, Windows, WebWeb
Founded19722006

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Minitab

  • Control charts
  • Process capability analysis
  • Measurement systems analysis
  • Design of experiments
  • Classical statistics
  • Assistant
  • Predictive Analytics module
  • Desktop and browser access

Only in Amazon Redshift ML

  • CREATE MODEL in SQL
  • Automatic model selection
  • Local inference
  • Bring your own model
  • Algorithm selection
  • Cost ceiling controls
  • Existing warehouse security
  • Batch and interactive scoring

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Minitab

  • Six Sigma and process improvement projects where the training materials and internal procedures already assume Minitabnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Producing capability and gage studies as evidence for a customer audit or a regulatory submissionnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Design of experiments on a production process, run by an engineer who will not be writing codenot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Quality departments that need credible statistics without hiring a statistician or a data scientistnot Amazon Redshift ML

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Adding a churn or propensity score to an existing dashboard where the data is already in Redshift and nobody needs a bespoke modelnot Minitab
  • Letting an analytics team test whether a predictive column has any business value before asking for data science headcountnot Minitab
  • Scoring rows inside a SQL pipeline where moving data out to a separate service would add fragility for little benefitnot Minitab
  • Organisations committed to AWS whose main constraint is a data science backlog rather than modelling sophisticationnot Minitab

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Minitab

  • Licensing is a per named user subscription, so an organisation where fifty engineers each need it twice a quarter pays fifty full seats for people who open it eight times a year.
  • Analyses are recorded as a project file and a session log rather than as code, so reviewing what somebody did means reading output instead of reading a script, and reproducing it a year later depends on the same version still being installed.
  • The machine learning capability is a separately licensed module with a fixed set of tree-based methods, so it is neither included in the base price nor competitive with what a Python user has for nothing.
  • There is no deployment path in the statistical product, so putting a model into a running process means buying Minitab Model Ops as another product or reimplementing the model somewhere else entirely.
  • Data handling is worksheet-shaped and held in memory, so anything past a few million rows means preparing the extract in another tool first, and joins and reshaping are clumsy compared with SQL or pandas.

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
  • Autopilot searches many candidate models by default and the duration and cost of CREATE MODEL scale with the data size and the MAX_CELLS setting, so an unconstrained statement against a large table is an expensive accident rather than an experiment.
  • Local inference runs on the Redshift cluster itself, so scoring millions of rows competes for the resources the warehouse exists to provide, and the remote inference alternative adds a per-batch network call plus an hourly SageMaker endpoint charge that persists whether or not anyone queries it.
  • The supported problem types are limited to what the exposed algorithms cover, so anything involving text, images, sequences, a custom loss function or a bespoke evaluation metric is out of scope and has to be built conventionally.
  • There is no retraining schedule, drift detection or model registry, so a model created by a statement stays exactly as trained until somebody remembers to recreate it, and nothing in the warehouse will report that its accuracy has decayed.

Pricing, plan by plan

Minitab

$2394/year
  • Solution Center Core$2394/year
    • Marked as Most Popular
    • Best for quality professionals
    • Minitab Dashboards
  • Solution Center Analytics$2593.5/year
    • Best for analytics professionals
    • Includes predictive analytics capabilities
    • Minitab Dashboards
  • Solution Center Copilot$2793/year
    • All-in-one platform for operational excellence
    • Includes AI-powered insights
    • Minitab Dashboards

Amazon Redshift ML

Free
  • Free TrialFree
    • 2-month trial
    • 750 DC2.Large hours
  • On-Demand$0.25/hour
    • Per-node pricing
    • SageMaker training

Which should you pick?

Choose Minitab if

  • You need control charts.
  • You work on Mac, Windows, Web.
  • You also want process capability analysis.
Minitab review

Choose Amazon Redshift ML if

  • You need create model in sql.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want automatic model selection.
Amazon Redshift ML review

Questions people ask

Is Minitab or Amazon Redshift ML better?
Neither clearly leads. Minitab starts at $2394/year and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Minitab or Amazon Redshift ML?
Amazon Redshift ML has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2394/year for Minitab and Free for Amazon Redshift ML.
Does Minitab or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
Minitab runs on Mac, Windows, Web. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
Can I use Amazon Redshift ML for free?
Yes. Amazon Redshift ML has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Minitab starts at $2394/year.
What is Minitab best used for?
Minitab is most often used for six sigma and process improvement projects where the training materials and internal procedures already assume minitab, producing capability and gage studies as evidence for a customer audit or a regulatory submission, design of experiments on a production process, run by an engineer who will not be writing code, quality departments that need credible statistics without hiring a statistician or a data scientist. Of those, six sigma and process improvement projects where the training materials and internal procedures already assume minitab and producing capability and gage studies as evidence for a customer audit or a regulatory submission are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
What can Minitab do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
Minitab covers Control charts, Process capability analysis, Measurement systems analysis, Design of experiments. Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL, Automatic model selection, Local inference, Bring your own model.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Minitab: Does Minitab run on macOS?

The installed desktop application is Windows. Mac users work through the browser version, which is included with the subscription but is not identical in every feature.

Amazon Redshift ML: Does it require SageMaker?

Yes. Redshift ML is an interface; the training happens in SageMaker and needs an IAM role and an S3 bucket for the intermediate data.

Minitab: Is it machine learning software?

Not primarily. It is a statistics package for quality and process work. Predictive modelling exists in a separate Predictive Analytics module and is limited to tree-based methods.

Amazon Redshift ML: Is there an extra charge?

The SQL interface is part of Redshift, but the training runs as a SageMaker job charged at SageMaker rates, and a remote inference endpoint is billed for as long as it exists.

Minitab: Can I buy a perpetual licence?

The current offer is subscription based. Older perpetual licences exist in the field but are not the way the product is sold now.

Amazon Redshift ML: What kinds of model can it build?

Regression, binary and multiclass classification through the automatic path, plus direct use of XGBoost, linear learner, multilayer perceptron and K-means. Anything beyond structured tabular prediction is out of scope.

Minitab: What is the difference between Minitab and Minitab Workspace or Engage?

Minitab Statistical Software does the analysis. Workspace and Engage are separate products for process mapping, project management and improvement programme governance, and are licensed separately.

Amazon Redshift ML: Can I use a model I trained myself?

Yes, through the bring-your-own-model path, either compiled into the cluster for local inference or called as a remote SageMaker endpoint.

Minitab: Can I automate it?

Only to a limited degree. There is a command language and integration options, but it is designed to be driven by a person through menus, not scheduled in a pipeline.

Amazon Redshift ML: Does it retrain automatically?

No. Retraining means running CREATE MODEL again, on a schedule you build yourself, and nothing in the product monitors whether it is needed.

Share

Related pages

More on Minitab

More on Amazon Redshift ML

Keep looking

Other head to heads