Machine Learning · head to head
JMP vs KNIME

JMP
Machine Learning
Desktop statistical and design of experiments software from a SAS subsidiary
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

KNIME
Machine Learning
Open source data analytics and integration platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: JMP it is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.; KNIME the free Analytics Platform runs locally only, so anything shared or scheduled requires a paid Hub
- They diverge on capability: JMP covers Custom design of experiments, KNIME covers Visual workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JMP and KNIME actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JMP
- Custom design of experiments
- Linked interactive graphics
- Analysis platforms
- Quality and process tools
- Graph Builder
- JSL scripting
- Scoring code export
- Predictive modelling in JMP Pro
Only in KNIME
- Visual workflows
- Data preprocessing
- Machine learning
- Visualization
- Reporting
- Python
- R
- Spark
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JMP
- Planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already havenot KNIME
- Process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulatornot KNIME
- Exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheetnot KNIME
- Semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where JMP is already the shared language for reporting resultsnot KNIME
KNIME
- Data science and machine learning workflowsnot JMP
- ETL and data pipeline automationnot JMP
- Predictive analytics and modelingnot JMP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JMP
- It is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.
- There is no Linux build and no server edition for running analyses, so JMP cannot sit in a scheduled pipeline the way an R or Python script can, and recurring reports depend on a named person running them on a laptop.
- The predictive modelling capability most buyers mean when they call this machine learning software is in JMP Pro, a separate and more expensive licence, so the base product's price is not the price of the thing being evaluated.
- JSL is proprietary to JMP, so the scripts, add-ins and automation a group accumulates over a decade do not port anywhere and become sunk cost the moment anyone questions the renewal.
- Deployment ends at exported scoring code with no registry, monitoring or retraining, so a model that runs in production is maintained by another team in another language and steadily diverges from the version the analyst still has open.
KNIME
- The free Analytics Platform runs locally only, so anything shared or scheduled requires a paid Hub
- The free AI assistant is limited to 20 interactions a month
- Paid workflow runtime is metered in credits, with 120 included on Pro and overage at $0.025 per vCore minute
- The Team plan at $99 a month includes 3 members, with additional seats at $49 a month each
- Business Hub pricing is on request, and its tiers are capped at 4, 8 and 16 vCores with 5, 5 and 20 users
Pricing, plan by plan
JMP
Free- TrialFree
- 30-day trial
- Full features
- JMP$1785/year
- Core JMP
- Standard features
KNIME
Free- Analytics PlatformFree
- 300+ data sources
- Unlimited local processing
- K-AI assistant (20 interactions/month)
- Pro$19/month
- 120 workflow runtime credits
- Data app deployment
- K-AI (500 interactions/month)
- Team$99/month
- All Pro features
- Collaboration spaces for up to 3 team members
- Additional members: $49/month each
- Business Hub$null/month
- Enterprise automation and governance
- LDAP/OAuth authentication
- Staged deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose JMP if
- You need custom design of experiments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac, Windows.
- You also want linked interactive graphics.
Choose KNIME if
- You need visual workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want data preprocessing.
Questions people ask
- Is JMP or KNIME better?
- Neither clearly leads. JMP starts at Free and KNIME at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JMP or KNIME?
- JMP starts at Free and KNIME at Free.
- Does JMP or KNIME run on more platforms?
- JMP runs on Mac, Windows. KNIME runs on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- Can I use JMP for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is JMP best used for?
- JMP is most often used for planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have, process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator, exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheet, semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where jmp is already the shared language for reporting results. Of those, planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already have and process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulator are not what KNIME is typically brought in for.
- What can JMP do that KNIME cannot?
- JMP covers Custom design of experiments, Linked interactive graphics, Analysis platforms, Quality and process tools. KNIME covers Visual workflows, Data preprocessing, Machine learning, Visualization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
JMP: Is JMP the same thing as SAS?
No. JMP is a separate desktop product from a SAS subsidiary, with its own interface, its own scripting language and its own licence. Knowing SAS does not transfer to it beyond the statistics.
KNIME: Is KNIME free?
Yes, KNIME Analytics Platform is free with 300+ data sources, unlimited local processing, and 20 K-AI assistant interactions per month.
SourceJMP: Do I need JMP Pro?
If you want cross validation, penalised regression, boosted trees or neural networks, yes. The base edition covers classical statistics, graphics and design of experiments well and stops short of predictive modelling.
KNIME: What do KNIME paid plans cost?
Pro plan starts at $19/month with 120 runtime credits. Team plan starts at $99/month for up to 3 members, with additional members at $49/month each.
SourceJMP: Does it run on Linux?
No. Windows and macOS only, as an installed application.
KNIME: What is KNIME's runtime credit system?
Pro and Team plans include runtime credits for workflow execution. Additional runtime beyond included credits costs $0.025 per vCore minute.
SourceJMP: Can I put a JMP model into production?
Only by exporting the scoring formula as SQL, C, Python or similar and running it in another system. JMP itself does not serve, monitor or retrain models.
KNIME: Does KNIME offer enterprise pricing?
Yes, Business Hub is available for enterprises needing automation, governance, LDAP/OAuth auth, and dedicated resources. Pricing available on request.
SourceJMP: Who actually uses it?
Process and quality engineers, and scientists in R&D, particularly in semiconductor, chemicals, pharmaceutical and medical device work. It is not usually chosen by data engineering or platform teams.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- JMP vs DataRobot
- JMP vs AWS SageMaker
- JMP vs Google Vertex AI
- JMP vs Azure Machine Learning
- JMP vs IBM SPSS
- JMP vs Minitab
- JMP vs Stata
- JMP vs Jupyter
- JMP vs Weights & Biases
- JMP vs Orange
- JMP vs Databricks
- JMP vs Snowflake
- JMP vs PyTorch
- JMP vs scikit-learn
- JMP vs Apache Spark MLlib
- JMP vs Weaviate
- JMP vs Alteryx
- JMP vs Anaconda
- JMP vs RapidMiner
- JMP vs Dataiku
- JMP vs Python
- JMP vs ClearML
- JMP vs Ollama
- JMP vs OpenRouter
- JMP vs Pachyderm
- JMP vs Ray
- KNIME vs DataRobot
- KNIME vs AWS SageMaker
- KNIME vs Google Vertex AI
- KNIME vs Azure Machine Learning
- KNIME vs IBM SPSS
- KNIME vs Minitab
- KNIME vs Stata
- KNIME vs Jupyter
- KNIME vs Weights & Biases
- KNIME vs Orange
- KNIME vs Databricks
- KNIME vs Snowflake
- KNIME vs PyTorch
- KNIME vs scikit-learn
- KNIME vs Apache Spark MLlib
- KNIME vs Weaviate
- KNIME vs Alteryx
- KNIME vs Anaconda
- KNIME vs RapidMiner
- KNIME vs Dataiku
- KNIME vs Python
- KNIME vs ClearML
- KNIME vs Ollama
- KNIME vs OpenRouter
- KNIME vs Pachyderm
- KNIME vs Ray
