Software · head to head
JMP vs Stata
The short version
- Only JMP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: JMP the Internet Archive's capture of JMP's homepage on 13 January 2020 named five distinct editions, JMP, JMP Live, JMP Pro, JMP Clinical, and JMP Genomics, each targeting a different analysis use case, with no price figure published for any.; Stata the entry Stata/BE edition is capped at 2,048 variables and 798 independent variables in a model
- They diverge on capability: JMP covers Interactive statistics, Stata covers Statistical analysis.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JMP and Stata actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JMP
- Interactive statistics
- Dynamic visualization
- Design of experiments
- Predictive modeling
- Quality control
- R
- MATLAB
Only in Stata
- Statistical analysis
- Data management
- Graphics
- Econometrics
- Survey analysis
- ODBC
- Linux support
Both cover
- SAS
- Python
- Excel
- Mac support
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JMP
- Machine learningnot Stata
- Data analysisnot Stata
- Model trainingnot Stata
- Predictive analyticsnot Stata
Stata
- Statistical analysis and econometrics on panel and survey datanot JMP
- Reproducible research with do files and logsnot JMP
- Teaching quantitative methods to studentsnot JMP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JMP
- The Internet Archive's capture of JMP's homepage on 13 January 2020 named five distinct editions, JMP, JMP Live, JMP Pro, JMP Clinical, and JMP Genomics, each targeting a different analysis use case, with no price figure published for any.
Stata
- The entry Stata/BE edition is capped at 2,048 variables and 798 independent variables in a model
- Raising the variable limit to 32,767 requires Stata/SE and 120,000 requires Stata/MP
- Stata/MP is licensed by core count, so 2 core and 4 core licences are priced separately
- Student licences require proof of enrolment at a degree granting institution
- Stata/MP is not sold on a 6 month student term
- Perpetual student licences cost several times the annual price, for example $298 against $94 for Stata/BE
Pricing, plan by plan
JMP
Free- TrialFree
- 30-day trial
- Full features
- JMP$1785/year
- Core JMP
- Standard features
Stata
$48/year- Stata/BE$48/year
- Basic edition
- Core features
- Stata/SE$295/year
- Standard edition
- Larger datasets
Which should you pick?
Choose JMP if
- You need interactive statistics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac, Windows.
- You also want dynamic visualization.
Choose Stata if
- You need statistical analysis.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want data management.
Questions people ask
- Is JMP or Stata better?
- Neither clearly leads. JMP starts at Free and Stata at $48/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JMP or Stata?
- JMP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for JMP and $48/year for Stata.
- Does JMP or Stata run on more platforms?
- JMP runs on Mac, Windows. Stata runs on Linux, Mac, Windows.
- Can I use JMP for free?
- Yes. JMP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Stata starts at $48/year.
- What is JMP best used for?
- JMP is most often used for machine learning, data analysis, model training, predictive analytics. Of those, machine learning and data analysis are not what Stata is typically brought in for.
- What can JMP do that Stata cannot?
- JMP covers Interactive statistics, Dynamic visualization, Design of experiments, Predictive modeling. Stata covers Statistical analysis, Data management, Graphics, Econometrics. Both handle SAS, Python, Excel, Mac support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- JMP vs AWS SageMaker
- JMP vs Google Vertex AI
- JMP vs Azure Machine Learning
- JMP vs DataRobot
- JMP vs Snowflake
- JMP vs TensorFlow
- JMP vs Comet ML
- JMP vs Keras
- JMP vs MLflow
- JMP vs Jupyter
- JMP vs PyTorch
- JMP vs scikit-learn
- JMP vs Apache Spark MLlib
- JMP vs Weights & Biases
- JMP vs Alteryx
- JMP vs Anaconda
- JMP vs Databricks
- JMP vs Dataiku
- Stata vs AWS SageMaker
- Stata vs Google Vertex AI
- Stata vs Azure Machine Learning
- Stata vs DataRobot
- Stata vs Snowflake
- Stata vs TensorFlow
- Stata vs Comet ML
- Stata vs Keras
- Stata vs MLflow
- Stata vs Jupyter
- Stata vs PyTorch
- Stata vs scikit-learn
- Stata vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Stata vs Weights & Biases
- Stata vs Alteryx
- Stata vs Anaconda
- Stata vs Databricks
- Stata vs Dataiku

