Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

Databricks vs Amazon Redshift ML

Databricks logo

Databricks

Machine Learning

Unified analytics platform for data engineering and data science

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Amazon Redshift ML logo

Amazon Redshift ML

Machine Learning

SQL statements in Redshift that train models on SageMaker and return them as functions

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Databricks cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges; Amazon Redshift ML training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
  • They diverge on capability: Databricks covers Delta Lake, Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Databricks and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.

Attributes where Databricks and Amazon Redshift ML differ
AttributeDatabricksAmazon Redshift ML
PlatformsWeb, Aws, Azure, GcpWeb
Founded20132006

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Databricks

  • Delta Lake
  • Apache Spark
  • MLflow
  • Unity Catalog
  • Photon Engine
  • Collaborative Notebooks
  • Auto-scaling
  • AWS

Only in Amazon Redshift ML

  • CREATE MODEL in SQL
  • Automatic model selection
  • Local inference
  • Bring your own model
  • Algorithm selection
  • Cost ceiling controls
  • Existing warehouse security
  • Batch and interactive scoring

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Databricks

  • Running Spark data engineering pipelines on managed clustersnot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storagenot Amazon Redshift ML
  • Training and serving machine learning models alongside the datanot Amazon Redshift ML

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Adding a churn or propensity score to an existing dashboard where the data is already in Redshift and nobody needs a bespoke modelnot Databricks
  • Letting an analytics team test whether a predictive column has any business value before asking for data science headcountnot Databricks
  • Scoring rows inside a SQL pipeline where moving data out to a separate service would add fragility for little benefitnot Databricks
  • Organisations committed to AWS whose main constraint is a data science backlog rather than modelling sophisticationnot Databricks

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Databricks

  • Cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
  • The free trial lasts 14 days
  • Discounts require a Committed Use Contract, with larger commitments needed for larger discounts
  • Azure Databricks pricing is set by Microsoft rather than by Databricks
  • Security and compliance capabilities are sold as separate platform add ons rather than included in the base rate

Amazon Redshift ML

  • Training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
  • Autopilot searches many candidate models by default and the duration and cost of CREATE MODEL scale with the data size and the MAX_CELLS setting, so an unconstrained statement against a large table is an expensive accident rather than an experiment.
  • Local inference runs on the Redshift cluster itself, so scoring millions of rows competes for the resources the warehouse exists to provide, and the remote inference alternative adds a per-batch network call plus an hourly SageMaker endpoint charge that persists whether or not anyone queries it.
  • The supported problem types are limited to what the exposed algorithms cover, so anything involving text, images, sequences, a custom loss function or a bespoke evaluation metric is out of scope and has to be built conventionally.
  • There is no retraining schedule, drift detection or model registry, so a model created by a statement stays exactly as trained until somebody remembers to recreate it, and nothing in the warehouse will report that its accuracy has decayed.

Pricing, plan by plan

Databricks

Free
  • Community EditionFree
    • Limited cluster
    • Notebook environment
    • Community support
  • Standard$0.07/DBU
    • Jobs compute
    • SQL compute
    • Standard support

Amazon Redshift ML

Free
  • Free TrialFree
    • 2-month trial
    • 750 DC2.Large hours
  • On-Demand$0.25/hour
    • Per-node pricing
    • SageMaker training

Which should you pick?

Choose Databricks if

  • You need delta lake.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
  • You also want apache spark.
Databricks review

Choose Amazon Redshift ML if

  • You need create model in sql.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want automatic model selection.
Amazon Redshift ML review

Questions people ask

Is Databricks or Amazon Redshift ML better?
Neither clearly leads. Databricks starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Databricks or Amazon Redshift ML?
Databricks starts at Free and Amazon Redshift ML at Free.
Does Databricks or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
Databricks runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
Can I use Databricks for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Databricks best used for?
Databricks is most often used for running spark data engineering pipelines on managed clusters, building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storage, training and serving machine learning models alongside the data. Of those, running spark data engineering pipelines on managed clusters and building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storage are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
What can Databricks do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
Databricks covers Delta Lake, Apache Spark, MLflow, Unity Catalog. Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL, Automatic model selection, Local inference, Bring your own model.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Databricks: How is Databricks priced?

Databricks bills pay as you go with no up front cost, charging per second for the products used. Consumption is measured in Databricks Units, a normalised unit of processing power on the platform.

Source
Amazon Redshift ML: Does it require SageMaker?

Yes. Redshift ML is an interface; the training happens in SageMaker and needs an IAM role and an S3 bucket for the intermediate data.

Databricks: Does Databricks publish a per DBU price?

Not on its main pricing page. Rates vary by product and instance type, and Databricks directs buyers to individual product pricing pages and a calculator rather than listing a single figure.

Source
Amazon Redshift ML: Is there an extra charge?

The SQL interface is part of Redshift, but the training runs as a SageMaker job charged at SageMaker rates, and a remote inference endpoint is billed for as long as it exists.

Databricks: Does the Databricks price include cloud costs?

No. Databricks states that if you configure it to work with your own cloud account, your cloud provider still charges you separately for the underlying resources.

Source
Amazon Redshift ML: What kinds of model can it build?

Regression, binary and multiclass classification through the automatic path, plus direct use of XGBoost, linear learner, multilayer perceptron and K-means. Anything beyond structured tabular prediction is out of scope.

Databricks: Can I get a discount on Databricks?

Databricks offers Committed Use Contracts, where larger usage commitments earn greater benefits, including options to use commitments flexibly across multiple clouds.

Source
Amazon Redshift ML: Can I use a model I trained myself?

Yes, through the bring-your-own-model path, either compiled into the cluster for local inference or called as a remote SageMaker endpoint.

Amazon Redshift ML: Does it retrain automatically?

No. Retraining means running CREATE MODEL again, on a schedule you build yourself, and nothing in the product monitors whether it is needed.

Share

Related pages

More on Databricks

More on Amazon Redshift ML

Keep looking

Other head to heads