Developer Tools · head to head
Jitsu vs Silent Eight

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Jitsu has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Jitsu jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.; Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- They diverge on capability: Jitsu covers Event collection, Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jitsu and Silent Eight actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jitsu | Silent Eight |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by event volume | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android | Web, Linux |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Silent Eight
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Silent Eight
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Silent Eight
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Silent Eight
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Jitsu
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Jitsu
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Jitsu
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Jitsu
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting.
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower.
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem.
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/month
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Which should you pick?
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Jitsu or Silent Eight better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jitsu starts at Free and Silent Eight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jitsu or Silent Eight?
- Jitsu has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Jitsu and On request for Silent Eight.
- Does Jitsu or Silent Eight run on more platforms?
- Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android. Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Jitsu for free?
- Yes. Jitsu has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Silent Eight starts at On request.
- What is Jitsu best used for?
- Jitsu is most often used for a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake, an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons, a product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor tool, a startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying cdp prices. Of those, a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake and an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons are not what Silent Eight is typically brought in for.
- What can Jitsu do that Silent Eight cannot?
- Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations. Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Jitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Jitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Jitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Ansible
- Jitsu vs Helix
- Jitsu vs Notepad++
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Backstage
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Garden
- Jitsu vs GitLab CI/CD
- Jitsu vs HCP Terraform
- Jitsu vs NICE Actimize
- Jitsu vs Quantexa
- Jitsu vs ThetaRay
- Jitsu vs Feedzai
- Jitsu vs Jumio
- Jitsu vs Sumsub
- Jitsu vs iDenfy
- Jitsu vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Jitsu vs Sardine
- Jitsu vs Camio
- Jitsu vs Unit21
- Jitsu vs Shufti Pro
- Jitsu vs NordPass
- Jitsu vs One Identity
- Jitsu vs Ory Kratos
- Jitsu vs OWASP ZAP
- Jitsu vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Jitsu vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Atlantis
- Silent Eight vs Tilt
- Silent Eight vs Visual Studio Code
- Silent Eight vs Penpot
- Silent Eight vs Bazel
- Silent Eight vs Eclipse IDE
- Silent Eight vs Pants Build
- Silent Eight vs Ansible
- Silent Eight vs Helix
- Silent Eight vs Notepad++
- Silent Eight vs Steampipe
- Silent Eight vs Backstage
- Silent Eight vs Blacksmith
- Silent Eight vs Coder
- Silent Eight vs Garden
- Silent Eight vs GitLab CI/CD
- Silent Eight vs HCP Terraform
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
