Developer Tools · head to head
Jitsu vs Phocas

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Phocas
Business Intelligence
Pre-built BI and FP&A for wholesale distributors and manufacturers running mid-market ERPs
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Jitsu is an MIT-licensed alternative to Segment.
- Jitsu starts at $99/mo; Phocas prices on request.
- Only Jitsu lists event collection; only Phocas lists ERP connectors.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jitsu and Phocas actually diverge.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
Only in Phocas
- ERP connectors
- Pre-built distribution content
- Grid-first analysis
- Financial statements
- Budgets and forecasts
- Rebates module
- Alerts and subscriptions
- Mobile apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Phocas
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Phocas
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Phocas
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Phocas
Phocas
- A wholesale distributor on Prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writernot Jitsu
- A manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheetnot Jitsu
- A multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal BI teamnot Jitsu
- A private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different ERPsnot Jitsu
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor
Phocas
- The value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway
- If your ERP is not on the maintained connector list you fall back to generic database extraction and lose the fast time to value that justifies the price
- The visualisation library is thin next to Power BI or Tableau, and analysts who want fine control over chart design will find it constraining
- Pricing is quoted per user and never published, and buyers routinely report large gaps between initial and renewal quotes with limited comparison leverage
- Modules are licensed separately, so a customer who bought Analytics and later wants Financial Statements or Rebates faces a new negotiation rather than an upgrade
Pricing, plan by plan
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/mo
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- EnterpriseOn request
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Phocas
On request- PhocasOn request
- Annual subscription quoted by user count and modules
- Analytics, Financial Statements, Budgets and Rebates licensed separately
- One-off implementation and ERP connector setup fee
Which should you pick?
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Choose Phocas if
- You need erp connectors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pre-built distribution content.
Questions people ask
- Is Jitsu or Phocas better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jitsu starts at Free and Phocas at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jitsu or Phocas?
- Jitsu has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Jitsu and On request for Phocas.
- Does Jitsu or Phocas run on more platforms?
- Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, iOS, Android. Phocas runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Jitsu for free?
- Yes. Jitsu has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Phocas starts at On request.
- What is Jitsu best used for?
- Jitsu is most often used for a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake, an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons, a product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor tool, a startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying cdp prices. Of those, a team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to snowflake and an engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own vpc for data residency or security review reasons are not what Phocas is typically brought in for.
- What can Jitsu do that Phocas cannot?
- Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations. Phocas covers ERP connectors, Pre-built distribution content, Grid-first analysis, Financial statements.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Phocas: What does Phocas cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted annually by user count and module, with a separate implementation fee, and varies by region.
Jitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Phocas: Is it worth it over Power BI?
Only if you are in its target verticals on a supported ERP. Power BI is far cheaper per seat but you supply the data model.
Jitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Phocas: Does it replace my ERP reporting?
It replaces day-to-day analysis and sales reporting. Transactional and statutory reporting stays in the ERP.
Jitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Phocas: Can it do budgeting?
Yes, through a separately licensed Financial Statements and Budgets module on the same warehouse.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Frappe
- Jitsu vs Kubernetes
- Jitsu vs GNU Emacs
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs GitHub
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Turborepo
- Jitsu vs Yarn
- Jitsu vs Argo CD
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs CLion
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Power BI
- Jitsu vs Domo
- Jitsu vs Zoho Analytics
- Jitsu vs Jedox
- Jitsu vs Hex
- Jitsu vs Evidence
- Jitsu vs Zenlytic
- Jitsu vs Cyfe
- Jitsu vs DashThis
- Jitsu vs Quid
- Jitsu vs Stripe Dashboard
- Jitsu vs Amazon QuickSight
- Jitsu vs Rill Data
- Jitsu vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Jitsu vs Snowplow
- Jitsu vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Jitsu vs Yellowfin
- Jitsu vs Zebra BI
- Phocas vs Atlantis
- Phocas vs Visual Studio Code
- Phocas vs Steampipe
- Phocas vs Tilt
- Phocas vs Frappe
- Phocas vs Kubernetes
- Phocas vs GNU Emacs
- Phocas vs Penpot
- Phocas vs Bazel
- Phocas vs Eclipse IDE
- Phocas vs GitHub
- Phocas vs Pants Build
- Phocas vs Turborepo
- Phocas vs Yarn
- Phocas vs Argo CD
- Phocas vs Blacksmith
- Phocas vs CLion
- Phocas vs Coder
- Phocas vs Power BI
- Phocas vs Domo
- Phocas vs Zoho Analytics
- Phocas vs Jedox
- Phocas vs Hex
- Phocas vs Evidence
- Phocas vs Zenlytic
- Phocas vs Cyfe
- Phocas vs DashThis
- Phocas vs Quid
- Phocas vs Stripe Dashboard
- Phocas vs Amazon QuickSight
- Phocas vs Rill Data
- Phocas vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Phocas vs Snowplow
- Phocas vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Phocas vs Yellowfin
- Phocas vs Zebra BI
